Tree: 316d4f32a0

2015_12_bip1

20160201_status_updates_d2f

20170314-comments

master

patch-1

patch-2

staging

Branches Tags

${ item.name }

Create tag ${ searchTerm }

Create branch ${ searchTerm }

from '316d4f32a0'

${ noResults }

Commit Graph

1276 Commits (316d4f32a0fa5630de027893e8e7ef2c74bd4c3d)

 

All Branches   

Search

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Luke Dashjr	5e6f3ba3be	bip-0009: Remove n/a paragraph	9 years ago
Matt David	40d4246d3d	- Remove libsecp256k1 reference	9 years ago
Matt David	e1d74be3b6	- Update ECDH output to use SHA512 instead of SHA256 - Specify HMAC_DRBG security strength	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	162e2e0025	Replace "rules/force" mutation with a "cannot be ignored" prefix to rule names	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	0bbe045104	Merge pull request #381 from dooglus/patch-3 Update bip-0112.mediawiki	9 years ago
Matt David	3cf25a7594	Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' # Conflicts: # bip-0075.mediawiki	9 years ago
BtcDrak	6313ee0f3b	Add sorting	9 years ago
BtcDrak	b56f7d7b6d	Add BIP9 assignments	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	32f7724149	Merge pull request #384 from jl2012/patch-19 BIP141: BIP9 parameters for testnet	9 years ago
Johnson Lau	797a4167b8	BIP141: BIP9 parameters for testnet	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	aa5531d831	Merge pull request #378 from jl2012/patch-18 BIP141 clarifications and formatting	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	c3e5f1411f	Merge pull request #382 from dooglus/patch-4 Update bip-0068.mediawiki	9 years ago
Chris Moore	56cd35957f	Update bip-0068.mediawiki Fix typo.	9 years ago
Chris Moore	bffcc0c29a	Update bip-0112.mediawiki CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is absolute (not relative) isn't it?	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	7b30c3d63e	Merge pull request #380 from achow101/master Update BIP 144 'havewitness' to service bit	9 years ago
Matt David	a90bd90c3c	Merge pull request #17 from jmacwhyte/master Updated S&F suggestions, some other tweaks and typos.	9 years ago
jmacwhyte	f8f05f0ac9	Updated S&F suggestions, some other tweaks and typos.	9 years ago
Matt David	a79432ac99	- Spacing - Recommit mistakently deleted encrypted invoicerequest flow diagram	9 years ago
Andrew Chow	dde47fc973	Update to NODE_WITNESS service bit	9 years ago
Matt David	057591da8c	Fix spacing again and pull IV size down to 12 bytes in accord with NIST 800-38D	9 years ago
Matt David	dcbbc871dc	- Fix spacing	9 years ago
Matt David	1e6e914ca7	- Fix spacing	9 years ago
Matt David	7d9e11dbcb	- Add information about the use of GCM Authentication tag - Add requirement of additional authenticated data in the case that either status_code and/or status_message are in use	9 years ago
Matt David	b5517bab86	Add more linebreaks	9 years ago
Matt David	32d9f9d266	Adding linebreaks and fixing some bad links	9 years ago
Matt David	c2a73346a3	- Fix straggling EncryptedPaymentRequest reference	9 years ago
Matt David	6c9625e832	- Fix formatting + fix/add links - Update images	9 years ago
Matt David	8bb63058fd	- Reset bip-0070/extensions.mediawiki to the original BIP70 contents - Remove status_code and status_message from individual Payment Protocol messages - Remove EncryptedInvoiceRequest, EncryptedPaymentRequest, EncryptedPayment and EncryptedPaymentACK messages from protobuf definition file - Add ProtocolMessageType enum and ProtocolMessageType and EncryptedProtocolMesssage messages to bip-0075/paymentrequest.proto definition file - Update BIP75 text to remove old individual message encryption paths and include new encapsulating messages for self-contained PaymentProtocol communication (including errors) over various transport layers - Add initial list of status codes - Update BIP75 to use AES-256-GCM and remove message hash as GCM mode provides authenticated encryption - Update ECDH calculation to use SHA256 hash of ECDH's X point instead of the raw X point itself	9 years ago
Johnson Lau	ab4f511c5c	BIP141 clarifications and formatting Add rationale of block cost Change the name of "witness nonce" to "witness reserved value" Update link to reference implementation Formatting	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	6015939b3b	Merge pull request #377 from OpenBitcoinPrivacyProject/bip47 BIP-0047: version 2 payment codes	9 years ago
Kristov Atlas	1d45d84db6	Merge pull request #2 from justusranvier/bip47 BIP-47: version 2 payment codes	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	cc4a94c1c0	BIP 9 & 145: rules/force mutation	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	3cfa48d1e0	BIP 9: Clarify GBT "version"	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	31c45b611d	BIP 9, 22 & 145: Use simple Yes/No rather than templates (which don't work on GitHub)	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	2e5533849e	Merge remote-tracking branch 'personal-github/segwit_gbt_updates_20160330' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	4683a9b714	BIP 9 (& 145): Switch to rules/vbavailable/vbrequired GBT interface	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	7e99bbf958	bip-0009: Recommend name "bipN"	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	5f697ea543	Merge branch 'master' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	cf51071ccd	Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2sh BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost	9 years ago
jl2012	f245646f8b	BIP141: Block cost clrification	9 years ago
jl2012	43c34e846b	Add P2SH-P2WPKH example	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	cd1932a67a	Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4 fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation	9 years ago
Aaron Voisine	d72c1bfc71	Update bip-0141.mediawiki The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}" What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules.	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	932d0750f2	Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehash BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	a80fbaf619	Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofix BIP143: fix typo ("including")	9 years ago
Luke-Jr	5160fc71be	Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16 BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE	9 years ago
Bryan Bishop	a488367502	BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash function The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more readily understand the context of the proposal.	9 years ago
Johnson Lau	c1ef3a05e3	BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE	9 years ago
Bryan Bishop	4cb4534fd9	BIP143: fix typo ("including")	9 years ago
Justus Ranvier	283aa14f77	add version 2 section for bloom filter-based notifications	9 years ago