lukechilds/bips - bips - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Luke Dashjr	855eb22004	BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103: License under BSD-2-Clause terms [Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:46:36 PM UTC] <luke-jr> sipa: if you get a minute, can you give me at least a text-"verbal" ACK for some copyright license to put on BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103 please? is BSD-2-Clause okay? [Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:01 PM UTC] <sipa> luke-jr: ACK on 2-clause BSD for 30,32,62,66,103 [Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:13 PM UTC] <sipa> (and for any other BIPs I contributed to)	8 years ago
Luke Dashjr	959fecc15b	Promote BIP 2 Draft->Active, and implement it - Update all Accepted status to Proposed (renamed status) - The BIP Comments preamble headers added to every BIP - The License preamble headers have been added to all BIPs with a Copyright section	8 years ago
Luke Dashjr	72f18918a8	Promote BIP 123 Draft->Active, and implement it	8 years ago
Pieter Wuille	916142e742	Mark BIP62 as withdrawn All of BIP62's (including the only-new-transactions) are currently enforced as standardness rules, but it seems hard to push it further. Every new type of complex transaction may require new extra rules, and some important types of malleability cannot be addressed by it (for example, a single participant in a multisig spend creating a new signature with a different nonce). It seems wiser to pursue normalized txid or segregated witness-based solutions, which do solve this problem more fundamentally.	9 years ago
Luke Dashjr	5f2c0188be	BIP0062: Add a warning about its undeployable status	10 years ago
Douglas Roark	ec575baa55	Minor grammatical change The sentence regarding allowing empty byte arrays to indicate an invalid ECDSA signature is confusing. I attempted to make it clearer. If I screwed it up or can make it even clearer, please let me know. Thank you.	10 years ago
Peter Todd	57f871fdca	Minor: BIP62: spelling	10 years ago
Douglas Roark	4cd13bf62d	Fix broken source code link.	10 years ago
Peter Todd	cea602ef6c	BIP62: Make OP_0 a validly encoded signature Previously BIP62 did not provide a compact way to delibrately encode an invalid signature. For example in BIP19 if m != n with this change you can provide compact OP_0's in the scriptSig rather than lengthy DER-encoded signatures. Note that we may want to further expand on this change in the future by saying that only OP_0 is a "valid" invalid signature; BIP19 even with this change is inherently malleable as the invalid signatures can be any validly encoded DER signature.	10 years ago
Andy Alness	3bb62ecaf4	Add explicit note about OpenSSL wrt low S values	10 years ago
Pieter Wuille	9625a83f70	BIP62: Reorder rules and clarify	11 years ago
Pieter Wuille	c61a4b9491	Restructure and make rules 2 and 4 unconditional	11 years ago
Wladimir J. van der Laan	1647c7e6d3	Change date format to ISO 8601 This came up on the mailing list. yyyy-mm-dd (ISO 8601) is the internationally accepted format for numeric dates. This commit changes all BIPs to use that instead of dd-mm-yyyy. It also updates BIP 0001 to prescribe the new format.	11 years ago
Pieter Wuille	54e94f32d5	Add draft BIP62	11 years ago

15 Commits (b455cad3f85ae33f9bc92c9a71cacf4d88934e9b)