Browse Source

Refactor Contributing

patch-2
Esteban Ordano 10 years ago
parent
commit
02cda17620
  1. 261
      CONTRIBUTING.md

261
CONTRIBUTING.md

@ -1,84 +1,239 @@
Contributing to Bitcore
=======
Are you a developer looking to learn more about bitcoin?
Bitcore is a great opportunity to do so, and give back to
the community. At BitPay we encourage any developer to read the source
code and help us improve it by fixing bugs, implementing
new exciting features, and testing existing code.
Pull requests are the standard mechanism by which you contribute code to open-source projects.
To do so, start by forking our repo on GitHub. Go to
[github.com/bitpay/bitcore](https://github.com/bitpay/bitcore)
and click the 'Fork' button. You'll get your own fork of the repository which will look something like this:
```
https://github.com/user/bitcore
```
We're working hard to make *bitcore* the easier and most powerful javascript
library for working with bitcoin. Our goal is to have *bitcore* be a library
that can be used by anyone interested on bitcoin, and level the expertise
differences with a great design and documentation.
Then clone your fork on your machine:
```
git clone git@github.com:user/bitcore && cd bitcore/
We have a pretty strict set of guidelines for contributing.
## Quick checklist
Make sure:
* `gulp lint` doesn't complain about your changes
* `gulp test` passes all the tests
* `gulp coverage` covers 100% of the branches of your code
## Design Guidelines
These are some global design goals in bitcore that any change must adhere to.
### D1 - Naming Matters
We take our time with picking names. Code is going to be written once, and read
hundreds of times.
We were inspired to name this rule first due to Uncle Bob's great work *Clean
Code*, which has a whole chapter on this subject.
In particular, you may notice that some names in this library are quite long
for the average javascript user. That's because we better have a long but
comprehensible name rather than an abbreviation that might confuse new users.
### D2 - Tests
Write a test for all your code. We encourage Test Driven Development so we know
when our code is right. We migrated from our original code base with a 80% test
coverage and are targeting 100% as we move towards our 1.0 release.
### D3 - Robustness Principle
*Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept.*
Interfaces accept as much types of arguments as possible, so there's no mental
tax on using them: we want to avoid questions such as "should I use a string
here or a buffer?", "what happens if I'm not sure if the type of this variable
is an Address instance or a string with it encoded in base-58?" or "what kind
of object will I receive after calling this function?".
Accept a wide variety of usages and arguments, always return an internal kind
of object. For example, the class `PublicKey` can accept strings or buffers
with a DER encoded public key (either compressed or uncompressed), another
PublicKey, a PrivateKey, or a Point, an instance of the `elliptic.js` library
with the point in bitcoin's elliptic curve that represents the public key.
### D4 - Consistency Everywhere
Consistency on the way classes are used is paramount to allow an easier
understanding of the library.
## Style Guidelines
The design guidelines have quite a high abstraction level. These style
guidelines are easier to detect and apply, and also more opinionated (the
design guidelines mentioned above are the way we think about general software
development and we believe they should be present on any software project).
### G1 - General: No Magic Numbers
Avoid constants in the code as much as possible. Magic strings are also magic
numbers.
### G2 - General: Internal Objects should be Instances
If a class has a `publicKey` member, for instance, that should be a `PublicKey`
instance.
### G3 - General: Internal amounts must be integers representing Satoshis
Avoid representation errors by always dealing with satoshis. For conversion for
frontends, use the `Unit` class.
### G4 - General: Internal network references must be Network instances
A special case for [G2](#g2---general-internal-objects-should-be-instances) all
network references must be `Network` instances (see `lib/network.js`), but when
returned to the user, its `.name` property should be used.
### G5 - General: Objects should display nicely in the console
Write a `.inspect()` method so an instance can be easily debugged in the
console.
### E1 - Errors: Use bitcore.Errors
We've designed a structure for Errors to follow and are slowly migrating to it.
Usage:
* Errors are generated in the file `lib/errors/index.js` by invoking `gulp
errors`.
* The specification for errors is written in the `lib/errors/spec.js` file.
* Whenever a new class is created, add a generic error for that class in
`lib/errors/spec.js`.
* Specific errors for that class should subclass that error. Take a look at the
structure in `lib/errors/spec.js`, it should be clear how subclasses are
generated from that file.
### E2 - Errors: Provide a getValidationError static method for classes
### I1 - Interface: Make Code that Fails Early
In order to deal with javascript's weak typing and confusing errors, we ask our
code to fail as soon as possible when an unexpected input was provided.
There's a module called `util/preconditions`, loosely based on
`preconditions.js`, based on `guava`, that we use for state and argument
checking. It should be trivial to use. We recommend using it on all methods, in
order to improve robustness and consistency.
```javascript
$.checkState(something === anotherthing, 'Expected something to be anotherthing');
$.checkArgument(something < 100, 'something', 'must be less than 100');
$.checkArgumentType(something, PrivateKey, 'something'); // The third argument is a helper to mention the name of the argument
$.checkArgumentType(something, PrivateKey); // but it's optional (will show up as "(unknown argument)")
```
Add the official repo as a remote, to track our changes:
### I2 - Interface: Permissive Constructors
Most classes have static methods named `fromBuffer`, `fromString`, `fromJSON`.
Whenever one of those methods is provided, the constructor for that class
should also be able to detect the type of the arguments and call the
appropriate method.
### I3 - Interface: Method Chaining
For classes that have a mutable state, most of the methods that can be chained
*SHOULD* be chained, allowing for interfaces that read well, like:
```javascript
var transaction = new Transaction()
.from(utxo)
.to(address, amount)
.change(address)
.sign(privkey);
```
git remote add bitpay git@github.com:bitpay/bitcore.git
### I4 - Interface: Copy Constructors
Constructors, when provided an instance of the same class, should:
* Return the same object, if the instances of this class are immutable
* Return a deep copy of the object, if the instances are mutable
Examples:
```javascript
function MyMutableClass(arg) {
if (arg instanceof MyMutableClass) {
return MyMutableClass._deepCopy(arg);
}
// ...
}
function ImmutableClass(arg) {
if (arg instanceof ImmutableClass) {
return arg;
}
// ...
}
```
Create a new branch for the changes you are going to contribute, with a relevant name. Some examples:
### I5 - Interface: No new keyword for Constructors
Constructors should not require to be called with `new`. This rule is not
heavily enforced, but is a "nice to have".
```javascript
function NoNewRequired(args) {
if (!(this instanceof NoNewRequired)) {
return new NoNewRequired(args);
}
// ...
}
```
### T1 - Testing: Tests Must be Written Elegantly
Style guidelines are not relaxed for tests. Tests are a good way to show how to
use the library, and maintaining them is extremely necessary.
Don't write long tests, write helper functions to make them be as short and
concise as possible (they should take just a few lines each), and use good
variable names.
### T2 - Testing: Tests Must not be Random
Inputs for tests should not be generated randomly. Also, the type and structure
of outputs should be checked.
## Pull Request Workflow
Our workflow is based on GitHub's pull requests. We use feature branches,
prepended with: `test`, `feature`, `fix`, `refactor`, or `remove` according to
the change the branch introduces. Some examples for such branches are:
```sh
git checkout -b test/some-module
git checkout -b feature/some-new-stuff
git checkout -b fix/some-bug
git checkout -b remove/some-file
```
Work on your changes:
```
vim somefile.txt
git add somefile.txt
git commit -a -m"adding somefile.txt"
```
When you think your code is ready, update your branch by
getting the changes from the main repo first, as there may have been
changes while you were working:
```
We expect pull requests to be rebased to the master branch before merging:
```sh
git remote add bitpay git@github.com:bitpay/bitcore.git
git pull --rebase bitpay master
```
(You may need to solve any conflicts from the rebase at this point.)
Note that we require rebasing your branch instead of mergeing it, for commit readability reasons.
A final and important step is to run the tests and check they all pass.
This is done by running `mocha` in the project's directory. You'll also
need to check that tests pass in the browser, by running:
`grunt shell` and opening the `bitcore/test/index.html` file in your
browser.
Note that we require rebasing your branch instead of mergeing it, for commit
readability reasons.
After that, you can push the changes to your fork, by doing:
```
```sh
git push origin your_branch_name
git push origin feature/some-new-stuff
git push origin fix/some-bug
```
Finally go to [github.com/bitpay/bitcore](https://github.com/bitpay/bitcore) in
your web browser and issue a new pull request.
Finally go to [github.com/bitpay/bitcore](https://github.com/bitpay/bitcore) in your
web browser and issue a new pull request. GitHub normally recognizes you have pending
changes in a new branch and will suggest creating the pull request. If it doesn't, you can
always go to [github.com/bitpay/bitcore/compare](https://github.com/bitpay/bitcore/compare) and
choose the correct forks and branches.
Main contributors will review your code and possibly ask for
changes before your code is pulled in to the main repository.
We'll check that all tests pass, review the coding style, and
check for general code correctness. If everything is OK, we'll
merge your pull request and your code will be part of bitcore.
Main contributors will review your code and possibly ask for changes before
your code is pulled in to the main repository. We'll check that all tests
pass, review the coding style, and check for general code correctness. If
everything is OK, we'll merge your pull request and your code will be part of
bitcore.
If you have any questions feel free to post them to
[github.com/bitpay/bitcore/issues](https://github.com/bitpay/bitcore/issues).
Thanks for your time and code!

Loading…
Cancel
Save