|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
layout: learn
|
|
|
|
permalink: /:collection/:path.html
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Principles of Blockstack applications
|
|
|
|
{:.no_toc}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are as many perspectives on what makes a decentralized app (DApp) as there
|
|
|
|
are DApp developers. This section defines the principles that Blockstack
|
|
|
|
advocates for DApps operating within its platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* TOC
|
|
|
|
{:toc}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Blockstack DApp principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An application is considered a Blockstack DApp if it adheres to three
|
|
|
|
principles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### I. Users own their data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DApps do not store or replicate user data. Users own their application
|
|
|
|
data independent of and *outside of* the application. A Blockstack application
|
|
|
|
is only considered decentralized if its users control where their data is
|
|
|
|
hosted and can prove that they created the data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blockstack applications meet this principle if they use the Gaia storage system.
|
|
|
|
Users may sign and/or encrypt their data in Gaia end-to-end. All files in Gaia
|
|
|
|
are addressed by a user identifier, an application's hostname, and a filename.
|
|
|
|
Through Gaia, users can prove data ownership and restrict access.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the future, users will be able to choose on an app-by-app basis which Gaia
|
|
|
|
hub serves their application data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### II. Users own their identities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users are the sole administer of their own independent and unique
|
|
|
|
identifiers. Within an applications, users must be distinguishable by unique
|
|
|
|
identifiers. The DApp cannot mask or take away a user's identifier, and a user
|
|
|
|
must be able to bind their identifier to the data they create.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blockstack DApps anticipate that each user can own one or more IDs. In turn,
|
|
|
|
these IDs are owned by a private key under the user's control. The IDs are
|
|
|
|
acquired through the Blockstack naming system. First time users that log into
|
|
|
|
the Blockstack application get a free `id.blockstack` in the Blockstack namespace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blockstack IDs are replicated to all peers via a blockchain, this means
|
|
|
|
Blockstack cannot hide IDs. Blockstack IDs each have a public key assigned to
|
|
|
|
them via the blockchain records that encode their operational history. This
|
|
|
|
public key allows users to bind data to their Blockstack IDs through
|
|
|
|
cryptographic signatures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### III. Users have free choice of clients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identities and _data_ are application independent. An application cannot be
|
|
|
|
considered a DApp unless it allows users to interact with their identities and
|
|
|
|
data such that the user can later do so via a different DApp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, a user that creates data in client 'X' must be able access that
|
|
|
|
data from a different client, 'Y', provided the client allows compatible
|
|
|
|
mechanisms. Ultimately, the user has the freedom to write their own client that
|
|
|
|
interacts with their own data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blockstack's APIs and SDKs make it easy to build applications that adhere to
|
|
|
|
this principle. Existing Blockstack applications have this property today simply
|
|
|
|
because they don't have any irreplaceable server-side logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the future, Blockstack applications must continue to meet the first two
|
|
|
|
principles but need not meet this one. For example, an application could
|
|
|
|
encrypt data in-transit between the application's client and the user's chosen
|
|
|
|
Gaia hub provider. Unless the app divulges the encryption key to the user, then
|
|
|
|
the user does not have free choice of clients; they can only use clients that
|
|
|
|
the app's servers choose to interact with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Non-Principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll notice the Blockstack principles avoid adherence to a particular network
|
|
|
|
topology or architecture. Many DApps have defining characteristics that are
|
|
|
|
implementation-specific rather than expressions of overall DApp design goals.
|
|
|
|
These aspects are mentioned here as specific non-goals of Blockstack
|
|
|
|
applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### DApps have smart contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decentralized apps pre-date blockchains and smart contracts, and even today
|
|
|
|
there are popular DApps that do not need them. Examples include pre-Microsoft
|
|
|
|
Skype (which was peer-topeer), Mastadon, IRC, and email.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another word for "smart contract" is "replicated state machine." Some DApps
|
|
|
|
need each peer to execute the same sequence of operations in order to fulfill
|
|
|
|
their business needs (in which case a smart contract would be appropriate),
|
|
|
|
but many do not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blockstack DApps do not use smart contracts at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### DApps have tokens and/or non-fungible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar to smart contracts, DApps pre-date tokens and non-fungible assets.
|
|
|
|
While having a crypto token or asset can help incentivize DApp deployment and
|
|
|
|
usage, they are not strictly necessary for their operation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### DApps use a blockchain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blockchains are a new tool for DApp developers to help coordinate peers, but
|
|
|
|
they are just that -- a tool. Sometimes blockchains are the right tool for the
|
|
|
|
job, and sometimes they are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## DApps serve users
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fundamentally, DApps should serve users by preserving user autonomy. Developers
|
|
|
|
should not profit from abusive features or neglectful designs.
|
|
|
|
Blockstack principles seek to prevent developers from profiting by either (a) building
|
|
|
|
abusive features into DApps like ad networks, or (b) neglecting users by failing
|
|
|
|
to build vital safety features like <a
|
|
|
|
href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banning"
|
|
|
|
target="\_blank">shadowbans</a>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because Blockstack applications allow users to own their identity and data and
|
|
|
|
gives them free choice of clients, any user can simply stop or avoid using bad DApps
|
|
|
|
with near-zero switching cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This isn't to say that DApps can't be profitable. DApps can still make money for
|
|
|
|
their developers, such as by offering content subscriptions or paid-for add-ons.
|
|
|
|
They can broker with third parties on behalf of their users to watch ads or
|
|
|
|
share data in exchange for tokens.
|