Fix typo in peer-review.md

2 years ago · cca2c94ec4
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
--- a/peer-review/peer-review-new.md
+++ b/peer-review/peer-review-new.md
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ To me, the complaint makes no sense. Nonetheless, I shall now try to explain thi

 First, the complaint asks us to consider "burdensome sidechains" which are expensive to run, but profitable.

-So imagine that all "sidechain" software costs $5 M / year to run, but "sidiechains" bring in $100 M / year (in txn fee revenue). A solo miner with only 4% of the hashrate would earn $4M from "sidechains" (just 4% of the total $100M). But "sidechains" would cost this miner a fixed $5M. So this miner does not run any sidechains. But conversely, a solo miner with 12% would run sidechains -- they'd pay $5M (fixed) and earn $12. This miner now earns a higher ROI (the $12/$5 ROI blends in with the subsistence ROI he was earning pre-sidechains). Because of sidechains, larger miners are rewarded more.
+So imagine that all "sidechain" software costs $5 M / year to run, but "sidechains" bring in $100 M / year (in txn fee revenue). A solo miner with only 4% of the hashrate would earn $4M from "sidechains" (just 4% of the total $100M). But "sidechains" would cost this miner a fixed $5M. So this miner does not run any sidechains. But conversely, a solo miner with 12% would run sidechains -- they'd pay $5M (fixed) and earn $12. This miner now earns a higher ROI (the $12/$5 ROI blends in with the subsistence ROI he was earning pre-sidechains). Because of sidechains, larger miners are rewarded more.

 The same problem applies to pools. The pool operators who mine "sidechains", will have an edge over those who do not. Pools which turn down the free money, will not attract Hashers. Therefore, eventually, "running all profitable sidechains" will become an activity that is de facto mandatory.

@ -268,4 +268,4 @@ People whose opinion on Drivechain we don't know (please tell us!), plus the fou
 ### See Also

 * [Why Drivechain is Hard to Understand](http://www.drivechain.info/blog/hard-to-understand/) -- Strange quirks of DC that make it different from previous soft forks of Bitcoin.
-* (forthcoming) [Conflicts of Interest](/link-forthcoming/) -- Almost everyone who could peer review drivechain, stands to lose a lot of money if it succeeds.
+* (forthcoming) [Conflicts of Interest](/link-forthcoming/) -- Almost everyone who could peer review drivechain, stands to lose a lot of money if it succeeds.