Browse Source

Remove duplicated refund timelock block calculation

no-contract-setup-message
Daniel Karzel 3 years ago
parent
commit
6626a76d0d
No known key found for this signature in database GPG Key ID: 30C3FC2E438ADB6E
  1. 18
      daemon/src/setup_contract_actor.rs

18
daemon/src/setup_contract_actor.rs

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
use crate::model::cfd::{AsBlocks, Cfd, FinalizedCfd};
use crate::model::cfd::{Cfd, FinalizedCfd};
use crate::wire::{AdaptorSignature, Msg0, Msg1, SetupMsg};
use anyhow::{Context, Result};
use bdk::bitcoin::secp256k1::{schnorrsig, SecretKey, Signature, SECP256K1};
@ -12,20 +12,6 @@ use futures::Future;
use std::collections::HashMap;
use tokio::sync::mpsc;
/// A factor to be added to the CFD order term for calculating the refund timelock.
///
/// The refund timelock is important in case the oracle disappears or never publishes a signature.
/// Ideally, both users collaboratively settle in the refund scenario. This factor is important if
/// the users do not settle collaboratively.
/// `1.5` times the term as defined in CFD order should be safe in the extreme case where a user
/// publishes the commit transaction right after the contract was initialized. In this case, the
/// oracle still has `1.0 * cfdorder.term` time to attest and no one can publish the refund
/// transaction.
/// The downside is that if the oracle disappears: the users would only notice at the end
/// of the cfd term. In this case the users has to wait for another `1.5` times of the
/// term to get his funds back.
pub const REFUND_THRESHOLD: f32 = 1.5;
/// Given an initial set of parameters, sets up the CFD contract with the other party.
/// Passing OwnParams identifies whether caller is the maker or the taker.
///
@ -74,7 +60,7 @@ pub fn new(
(params.maker().clone(), *params.maker_punish()),
(params.taker().clone(), *params.taker_punish()),
oracle_pk,
cfd.order.term.mul_f32(REFUND_THRESHOLD).as_blocks().ceil() as u32,
cfd.refund_timelock_in_blocks(),
vec![],
sk,
)

Loading…
Cancel
Save