We keep seeing this in the logs, after a final tx went in:
```
2021-10-11 16:58:18 ERROR Could not find script in own state for txid b542cbc1920bdd926d79fb17377eda7152ed944ec64a1b09ce68dd11d9e7467e, ignoring
```
This happens because multiple transactions have the same script (e.g. CET, refund).
Once the CET is final we remove it from monitoring, which results in the txid not being available when matching.
We always replaced it with `remaining`, but when populating `awaiting_status` upon sync we only go by the keys, so we actually fill in the script status again.
We should remove the complete entry if we want to make sure that we don't want to process it anymore.
Note: Kept seeing monitoring logs for things that were already past Finality (...) so we looked into this.
In this protocol we *can* actually have transactions with the same script, hence, we have to handle the `GetHistoryRes` by `Txid`.
To make this easier to understand we group the `Vec<Vec<GetHistoryRes>>` by `Txid` into `HashMap<Txid, GetHistroyRes>`.
Note: The assumption is, that only `GetHistroyRes` is returned for the `Txid`+`Script` combination.
In a real-world scenario this should actually never happen, but it is still weird to see `PendingOpen` jump to `Open` when testing with timelocks and attestations.
Since this is "more correct" we distinguish fine-granular.
Co-authored-by: Lucas <lucas@comit.network>
The DLC does not concern the UI, hence the amounts should be handles in satoshi.
Note: This commit enforces db reset of CFDs that are stored in `as_btc`.
We are looping over multiple CFDs when trying to publish the CET.
If we fail inside the loop then the next CFD(s) are not processed and CETs might not get published properly.
This should make the code more resilient.
Reasoning:
The state transition can fail, hence the result.
It can, however, happen that there is no failure, but we still did not transition to a new state.
In such cases we don't want to save the state in the database because it would be an unwanted duplicated entry.
The `Attestation` in the `oracle` module has `Desiarialization` rules that conflict with loading it from the db.
We should not reuse domain structs between modules anyway, so this was cleaned up by introducing a dedicated `model::Attestation` and mapping to `oracle::Attestation`.
Note: Since our sliding window of `next_24_hours` in the oracle actor is current hour `+[1..24]` the window should always be able to handle fetching an event of current hour + 1.
Instead of the oracle actor sending out the `Announcements` we only store them internally and let the cfd actors chose what `Announcement` is relevant given the term of the offer.
The specific `Announcement` is then fetched from the oracle actor.
The monitoring logic for pending attestations remains the same.
Block until we are sure that the update was done, because otherwise we might have weird side effects in the UI because there is a dependency on the announcements being available when creating offers.
- store TakerId for proposals to be able to respond to specific taker about
settlement proposal when the user takes action
- send the collab settlement response (accept or reject) from the maker
- handle rejection (remove from the map), CFD state in the UI returns to "Open"
Thomas Eizinger
Mariusz Klochowicz
Daniel Karzel
Philipp Hoenisch
Lucas Soriano del Pino