|
|
@ -2218,7 +2218,7 @@ def test_channel_spendable(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|
payment_hash = l1.rpc.invoice('any', 'inv', 'for testing')['payment_hash'] |
|
|
|
amount = l2.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['spendable_msat'] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Turns out we this won't route, as it's over max - reserve: |
|
|
|
# Turns out we won't route this, as it's over max - reserve: |
|
|
|
route = l2.rpc.getroute(l1.info['id'], amount + 1, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
l2.rpc.sendpay(route, payment_hash) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2237,6 +2237,59 @@ def test_channel_spendable(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|
l2.rpc.waitsendpay(payment_hash, TIMEOUT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@unittest.skipIf(not DEVELOPER, "gossip without DEVELOPER=1 is slow") |
|
|
|
def test_channel_receivable(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|
"""Test that receivable_msat is accurate""" |
|
|
|
sats = 10**6 |
|
|
|
l1, l2 = node_factory.line_graph(2, fundamount=sats, wait_for_announce=True, |
|
|
|
opts={'plugin': os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'tests/plugins/hold_invoice.py'), 'holdtime': str(TIMEOUT / 2)}) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
payment_hash = l2.rpc.invoice('any', 'inv', 'for testing')['payment_hash'] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We should be able to receive this much, and not one msat more! |
|
|
|
amount = l2.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['receivable_msat'] |
|
|
|
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l2.info['id'], amount + 1, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.sendpay(route, payment_hash) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This should fail locally with "capacity exceeded" |
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(RpcError, match=r"Capacity exceeded.*'erring_index': 0"): |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.waitsendpay(payment_hash, TIMEOUT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Exact amount should succeed. |
|
|
|
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l2.info['id'], amount, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.sendpay(route, payment_hash) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Amount should drop to 0 once HTLC is sent; we have time, thanks to |
|
|
|
# hold_invoice.py plugin. |
|
|
|
wait_for(lambda: len(l2.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['htlcs']) == 1) |
|
|
|
assert l2.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['receivable_msat'] == Millisatoshi(0) |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.waitsendpay(payment_hash, TIMEOUT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Make sure l2 thinks it's all over. |
|
|
|
wait_for(lambda: len(l2.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['htlcs']) == 0) |
|
|
|
# Now, reverse should work similarly. |
|
|
|
payment_hash = l1.rpc.invoice('any', 'inv', 'for testing')['payment_hash'] |
|
|
|
amount = l1.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['receivable_msat'] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Turns out we won't route this, as it's over max - reserve: |
|
|
|
route = l2.rpc.getroute(l1.info['id'], amount + 1, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
l2.rpc.sendpay(route, payment_hash) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This should fail locally with "capacity exceeded" |
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(RpcError, match=r"Capacity exceeded.*'erring_index': 0"): |
|
|
|
l2.rpc.waitsendpay(payment_hash, TIMEOUT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Exact amount should succeed. |
|
|
|
route = l2.rpc.getroute(l1.info['id'], amount, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
l2.rpc.sendpay(route, payment_hash) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Amount should drop to 0 once HTLC is sent; we have time, thanks to |
|
|
|
# hold_invoice.py plugin. |
|
|
|
wait_for(lambda: len(l1.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['htlcs']) == 1) |
|
|
|
assert l1.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['receivable_msat'] == Millisatoshi(0) |
|
|
|
l2.rpc.waitsendpay(payment_hash, TIMEOUT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@unittest.skipIf(not DEVELOPER, "gossip without DEVELOPER=1 is slow") |
|
|
|
def test_channel_spendable_large(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|
"""Test that spendable_msat is accurate for large channels""" |
|
|
@ -2248,26 +2301,30 @@ def test_channel_spendable_large(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|
payment_hash = l2.rpc.invoice('any', 'inv', 'for testing')['payment_hash'] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We should be able to spend this much, and not one msat more! |
|
|
|
amount = l1.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['spendable_msat'] |
|
|
|
spendable = l1.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['spendable_msat'] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# receivable from the other side should calculate to the exact same amount |
|
|
|
receivable = l2.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['receivable_msat'] |
|
|
|
assert spendable == receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# route or waitsendpay fill fail. |
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(RpcError): |
|
|
|
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l2.info['id'], amount + 1, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l2.info['id'], spendable + 1, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.sendpay(route, payment_hash) |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.waitsendpay(payment_hash, TIMEOUT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
print(l2.rpc.listchannels()) |
|
|
|
# Exact amount should succeed. |
|
|
|
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l2.info['id'], amount, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l2.info['id'], spendable, riskfactor=1, fuzzpercent=0)['route'] |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.sendpay(route, payment_hash) |
|
|
|
l1.rpc.waitsendpay(payment_hash, TIMEOUT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_channel_spendable_capped(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|
"""Test that spendable_msat is capped at 2^32-1""" |
|
|
|
def test_channel_spendable_receivable_capped(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|
"""Test that spendable_msat and receivable_msat is capped at 2^32-1""" |
|
|
|
sats = 16777215 |
|
|
|
l1, l2 = node_factory.line_graph(2, fundamount=sats, wait_for_announce=False) |
|
|
|
assert l1.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['spendable_msat'] == Millisatoshi(0xFFFFFFFF) |
|
|
|
assert l2.rpc.listpeers()['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['receivable_msat'] == Millisatoshi(0xFFFFFFFF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_lockup_drain(node_factory, bitcoind): |
|
|
|