lukechilds
/
lightning
mirror of https://github.com/lukechilds/lightning.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Browse Source

test-cli/scripts/test.sh: basic HTLC spending test. 

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
ppa-0.6.1
Rusty Russell 10 years ago
parent
fcbba0280d
commit
3b214479ae
1 changed files with 56 additions and 24 deletions
Whitespace
Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL
Split View
Diff Options
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File
  1. 80
      test-cli/scripts/test.sh

80
test-cli/scripts/test.sh
View File

@ -22,22 +22,26 @@ send_after_delay()
# triggered if we have < 11 blocks. Generate them now.
for i in `seq 11`; do scripts/generate-block.sh; done
# OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY will stop us spending for 60 seconds.
if $CLI sendrawtransaction $1 2>/dev/null; then
echo OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY broken! >&2
exit 1
fi
# Mine it.
for tx; do
if $CLI sendrawtransaction $tx 2>/dev/null; then
echo OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY broken! >&2
exit 1
fi
done
# Confirm them.
scripts/generate-block.sh
echo Waiting for CSV timeout. >&2
sleep 61
# Move median time, for sure!
for i in `seq 11`; do scripts/generate-block.sh; done
fi
$CLI sendrawtransaction $1
for tx; do
$CLI sendrawtransaction $tx
done
}
if [ $# = 0 ]; then
echo Usage: "INPUT" "[--steal|--unilateral]" >&2
echo Usage: "INPUT" "[--steal|--unilateral|--htlc-onchain]" >&2
exit 1
fi
@ -116,8 +120,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="-- +B-commit-sig.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-0.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-0.tx
# Now, update the channel, so I pay you 60000 satoshi (covers 50000 fee)
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=60000 $A_SEED 1 > A-update-1.pb
# Now, update the channel, so I pay you 80000 satoshi (covers 50000 fee)
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=80000 $A_SEED 1 > A-update-1.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS +A-update-1.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-1.pb"
@ -137,8 +141,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-complete-1.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-1.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-1.tx
# Now you pay me 250.
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=250 $B_SEED 2 > B-update-2.pb
# Now you pay me 5000.
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=5000 $B_SEED 2 > B-update-2.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS -B-update-2.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-2.pb"
@ -158,8 +162,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-complete-2.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-2.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-2.tx
# Now, A offers an HTLC for 50 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $A_SEED 3 50 $A_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > A-update-htlc-3.pb
# Now, A offers an HTLC for 10001 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $A_SEED 3 10001 $A_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > A-update-htlc-3.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS +A-update-htlc-3.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-htlc-3.pb"
@ -179,8 +183,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-complete-3.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-3.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-3.tx
# Now, B offers an HTLC for 100 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $B_SEED 4 100 $B_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > B-update-htlc-4.pb
# Now, B offers an HTLC for 10002 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $B_SEED 4 10002 $B_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > B-update-htlc-4.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS -B-update-htlc-4.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-htlc-4.pb"
@ -200,6 +204,33 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-complete-4.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-4.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-4.tx
# Solve the HTLCs with the R value on the chain.
if [ x"$1" = x--htlc-onchain ]; then
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-4.tx` > A-commit-4.txid
# Now, B can claim A's HTLC using R value.
# It's A's commit tx, so most of cmdline is written from A's POV.
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --rvalue=$A_HTLC1 -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx +A-update-htlc-3.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-3-spend.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-3-spend.tx` > B-htlc-3-spend.txid
# A can claim using B's HTLC using R value, after delay.
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --rvalue=$B_HTLC1 -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx -B-update-htlc-4.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY > A-htlc-4-spend.tx
send_after_delay `cut -d: -f1 A-htlc-4-spend.tx` > A-htlc-4-spend.txid
exit 0
fi
if [ x"$1" = x--unilateral ]; then
# Use commit-4, which has htlcs.
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-4.tx` > A-commit-4.txid
$PREFIX ./create-commit-spend-tx A-commit-4.tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-spend.tx
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx +A-update-htlc-3.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY > A-htlc-3-spend.tx
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx -B-update-htlc-4.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-4-spend.tx
# HTLCs conveniently set to 60 seconds, though absolute. Script
# shouldn't be that slow, so they should be unspendable to start.
send_after_delay `cut -d: -f1 A-spend.tx` `cut -d: -f1 A-htlc-3-spend.tx` `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-4-spend.tx` > A-spend.txids
exit 0
fi
# B completes A's HTLC using R value.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc-complete $B_SEED 5 $A_HTLC1 > B-update-htlc-complete-5.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS -B-update-htlc-complete-5.pb"
@ -244,19 +275,20 @@ $PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_P
if [ x"$1" = x--steal ]; then
# A stupidly broadcasts a revoked transaction.
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-1.tx` > A-commit-1.txid
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-4.tx` > A-commit-4.txid
# B uses the preimage from A-update-complete-2 to cash in.
$PREFIX ./create-steal-tx A-commit-1.tx A-update-complete-2.pb $B_FINALKEY B-open.pb A-open.pb $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-commit-steal.tx
# B uses the preimage from A-update-complete-5 to cash in.
$PREFIX ./create-steal-tx A-commit-4.tx A-update-complete-5.pb $B_FINALKEY B-open.pb A-open.pb $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-commit-steal.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-commit-steal.tx` > B-commit-steal.txid
exit 0
fi
if [ x"$1" = x--unilateral ]; then
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-2.tx` > A-commit-2.txid
$PREFIX ./create-commit-spend-tx A-commit-2.tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-spend.tx
send_after_delay `cut -d: -f1 A-spend.tx` > A-spend.txid
# Now B uses the same preimage to get the HTLC amounts too.
# It's A's commit tx, so most of cmdline is written from A's POV.
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --commit-preimage=A-update-complete-5.pb -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx +A-update-htlc-3.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-steal-1.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-steal-1.tx` > B-htlc-steal-1.txid
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --commit-preimage=A-update-complete-5.pb -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx -B-update-htlc-4.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-steal-2.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-steal-2.tx` > B-htlc-steal-2.txid
exit 0
fi

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save