Browse Source
This takes from the draft spec at https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/834 Note that if this draft does not get included, the peer will simply ignore the warning message (we always close the connection afterwards anyway). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Changelog-Added: Protocol: we now report the new (draft) warning message.master
12 changed files with 55 additions and 20 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ |
|||
--- wire/peer_exp_wire.csv 2021-01-14 11:00:27.526336550 +1030
|
|||
+++ - 2021-01-21 15:31:37.071118999 +1030
|
|||
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
|
|||
msgdata,error,channel_id,channel_id, |
|||
msgdata,error,len,u16, |
|||
msgdata,error,data,byte,len |
|||
+msgtype,warning,1
|
|||
+msgdata,warning,channel_id,channel_id,
|
|||
+msgdata,warning,len,u16,
|
|||
+msgdata,warning,data,byte,len
|
|||
msgtype,ping,18 |
|||
msgdata,ping,num_pong_bytes,u16, |
|||
msgdata,ping,byteslen,u16, |
Can't render this file because it has a wrong number of fields in line 2.
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue