lukechilds
/
lightning
mirror of https://github.com/lukechilds/lightning.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Browse Source

channel_states: fold all the ONCHAIND states into one. 

The billboard is now far more useful to tell what's going on, and this
gets us closer to a state == owner mapping.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
ppa-0.6.1
Rusty Russell 7 years ago
committed by Christian Decker
parent
866ba00445
commit
cccdb53bec
9 changed files with 73 additions and 99 deletions
Whitespace
Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL
Split View
Diff Options
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File
  1. 26
      README.md
  2. 13
      lightningd/channel.h
  3. 9
      lightningd/channel_state.h
  4. 17
      lightningd/onchain_control.c
  5. 5
      lightningd/peer_control.c
  6. 17
      onchaind/onchain.c
  7. 5
      onchaind/onchain_wire.csv
  8. 78
      tests/test_lightningd.py
  9. 2
      wallet/db.c

26
README.md
View File

@ -111,16 +111,22 @@ You can check the status of the channel using `cli/lightning-cli listpeers`, whi
### Different states
States starting with `ONCHAIND` mean that the channel has been closed and an onchain transaction exists reflecting the resulting balances
* `ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL` > Closed by you without cooperation of the counterparty
* `ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL` > Closed by the counterparty without your cooperation
* `ONCHAIND_MUTUAL` > Negotiated closing by both sides
States starting with `CHANNELD` mean that funds are not available onchain, and from that moment they can only be moved offchain, this is, through the Lightning Network
* `CHANNELD_AWAITING_LOCKIN` > Waiting for confirmation of the channel funding transaction
* `CHANNELD_NORMAL` > Channel is active
The `GOSSIPING` state means that you are connected to a peer but there is no payment channel yet.
* `GOSSIPING` means that you are connected to a peer but there is no
payment channel yet.
* `OPENINGD` means that `lightning_openingd` is negotiating channel opening.
* `CHANNELD_AWAITING_LOCKIN` means that `lightning_channeld` is waiting until
the minimum number of confirmation on the channel funding transaction.
* `CHANNELD_NORMAL` means your channel is operating normally.
* `CHANNELD_SHUTTING_DOWN` means one or both sides have asked to shut down the
channel, and we're waiting for existing HTLCs to clear.
* `CLOSINGD_SIGEXCHANGE` means we're trying to negotiate the fee for the mutual close transaction.
* `CLOSINGD_COMPLETE` means we've broadcast our mutual close
transaction (which spends the funding transaction) , but haven't seen it in a block yet.
* `FUNDING_SPEND_SEEN` means we've seen the funding transaction spent.
* `ONCHAIN` means that the `lightning_onchaind` is tracking the onchain closing of the channel.
All these states have more information about what's going on in the
`status` field in `listpeers`.
### Sending and receiving payments

13
lightningd/channel.h
View File

@ -171,20 +171,9 @@ static inline bool channel_fees_can_change(const struct channel *channel)
|| channel->state == CHANNELD_SHUTTING_DOWN;
}
static inline bool channel_can_remove_htlc(const struct channel *channel)
{
return channel->state == CHANNELD_NORMAL
|| channel->state == CHANNELD_SHUTTING_DOWN
|| channel->state == ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL
|| channel->state == ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL;
}
static inline bool channel_state_on_chain(enum channel_state state)
{
return state == ONCHAIND_CHEATED
|| state == ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL
|| state == ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL
|| state == ONCHAIND_MUTUAL;
return state == ONCHAIN;
}
static inline bool channel_on_chain(const struct channel *channel)

9
lightningd/channel_state.h
View File

@ -22,12 +22,9 @@ enum channel_state {
/* We've seen the funding spent, we're waiting for onchaind. */
FUNDING_SPEND_SEEN,
/* Various onchain states. */
ONCHAIND_CHEATED,
ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL,
ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL,
ONCHAIND_MUTUAL
/* On chain */
ONCHAIN
};
#define CHANNEL_STATE_MAX ONCHAIND_MUTUAL
#define CHANNEL_STATE_MAX ONCHAIN
#endif /* LIGHTNING_LIGHTNINGD_CHANNEL_STATE_H */

17
lightningd/onchain_control.c
View File

@ -48,21 +48,8 @@ static void onchaind_tell_fulfill(struct channel *channel)
static void handle_onchain_init_reply(struct channel *channel, const u8 *msg)
{
u8 state;
if (!fromwire_onchain_init_reply(msg, &state)) {
channel_internal_error(channel, "Invalid onchain_init_reply");
return;
}
if (!channel_state_on_chain(state)) {
channel_internal_error(channel,
"Invalid onchain_init_reply state %u (%s)",
state, channel_state_str(state));
return;
}
channel_set_state(channel, FUNDING_SPEND_SEEN, state);
/* FIXME: We may already be ONCHAIN state when we implement restart! */
channel_set_state(channel, FUNDING_SPEND_SEEN, ONCHAIN);
/* Tell it about any preimages we know. */
onchaind_tell_fulfill(channel);

5
lightningd/peer_control.c
View File

@ -344,11 +344,8 @@ void peer_connected(struct lightningd *ld, const u8 *msg,
#endif
switch (channel->state) {
case ONCHAIND_CHEATED:
case ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL:
case ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL:
case ONCHAIN:
case FUNDING_SPEND_SEEN:
case ONCHAIND_MUTUAL:
case CLOSINGD_COMPLETE:
/* Channel is active! */
abort();

17
onchaind/onchain.c
View File

@ -1051,16 +1051,16 @@ static void wait_for_resolved(struct tracked_output **outs)
take(towire_onchain_all_irrevocably_resolved(outs)));
}
static void set_state(enum channel_state state)
static void init_reply(const char *what)
{
wire_sync_write(REQ_FD, take(towire_onchain_init_reply(NULL, state)));
peer_billboard(true, what);
wire_sync_write(REQ_FD, take(towire_onchain_init_reply(NULL)));
}
static void handle_mutual_close(const struct bitcoin_txid *txid,
struct tracked_output **outs)
{
set_state(ONCHAIND_MUTUAL);
peer_billboard(true, "Tracking mutual close transaction");
init_reply("Tracking mutual close transaction");
/* BOLT #5:
*
@ -1269,8 +1269,7 @@ static void handle_our_unilateral(const struct bitcoin_tx *tx,
struct keyset *ks;
size_t i;
set_state(ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL);
peer_billboard(true, "Tracking our own unilateral close");
init_reply("Tracking our own unilateral close");
init_feerate_range(outs[0]->satoshi, tx);
@ -1571,8 +1570,7 @@ static void handle_their_cheat(const struct bitcoin_tx *tx,
struct privkey per_commitment_privkey;
struct pubkey per_commitment_point;
set_state(ONCHAIND_CHEATED);
peer_billboard(true, "Tracking their illegal close: taking all funds");
init_reply("Tracking their illegal close: taking all funds");
init_feerate_range(outs[0]->satoshi, tx);
@ -1832,8 +1830,7 @@ static void handle_their_unilateral(const struct bitcoin_tx *tx,
struct keyset *ks;
size_t i;
set_state(ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL);
peer_billboard(true, "Tracking their unilateral close");
init_reply("Tracking their unilateral close");
init_feerate_range(outs[0]->satoshi, tx);

5
onchaind/onchain_wire.csv
View File

@ -40,9 +40,8 @@ onchain_htlc,,htlc,struct htlc_stub
onchain_htlc,,tell_if_missing,bool
onchain_htlc,,tell_immediately,bool
# This sets what the state is, depending on tx.
# This says we're ready; give us preimages.
onchain_init_reply,5101
onchain_init_reply,,state,u8
# onchaind->master: Send out a tx.
onchain_broadcast_tx,5003
@ -87,4 +86,4 @@ onchain_add_utxo,5012
onchain_add_utxo,,prev_out_tx,struct bitcoin_txid
onchain_add_utxo,,prev_out_index,u32
onchain_add_utxo,,per_commit_point,struct pubkey
onchain_add_utxo,,value,u64
onchain_add_utxo,,value,u64

Can't render this file because it has a wrong number of fields in line 2.

78
tests/test_lightningd.py
View File

@ -1052,10 +1052,10 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
assert closetxid in set([o['txid'] for o in l1.rpc.listfunds()['outputs']])
assert closetxid in set([o['txid'] for o in l2.rpc.listfunds()['outputs']])
wait_for(lambda: l1.rpc.listpeers(l2.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status'] == ['CLOSINGD_SIGEXCHANGE:We agreed on a closing fee of 5430 satoshi', 'ONCHAIND_MUTUAL:Tracking mutual close transaction', 'ONCHAIND_MUTUAL:All outputs resolved: waiting 99 more blocks before forgetting channel'])
wait_for(lambda: l1.rpc.listpeers(l2.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status'] == ['CLOSINGD_SIGEXCHANGE:We agreed on a closing fee of 5430 satoshi', 'ONCHAIND:Tracking mutual close transaction', 'ONCHAIND_MUTUAL:All outputs resolved: waiting 99 more blocks before forgetting channel'])
l1.bitcoin.rpc.generate(9)
wait_for(lambda: l1.rpc.listpeers(l2.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status'] == ['CLOSINGD_SIGEXCHANGE:We agreed on a closing fee of 5430 satoshi', 'ONCHAIND_MUTUAL:Tracking mutual close transaction', 'ONCHAIND_MUTUAL:All outputs resolved: waiting 90 more blocks before forgetting channel'])
wait_for(lambda: l1.rpc.listpeers(l2.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status'] == ['CLOSINGD_SIGEXCHANGE:We agreed on a closing fee of 5430 satoshi', 'ONCHAIND:Tracking mutual close transaction', 'ONCHAIND_MUTUAL:All outputs resolved: waiting 90 more blocks before forgetting channel'])
# Make sure both have forgotten about it
l1.bitcoin.rpc.generate(90)
@ -1131,9 +1131,9 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
for p in peers:
p.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_MUTUAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_logs([' to ONCHAIND_MUTUAL'] * num_peers)
p.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
wait_for(lambda: p.rpc.listpeers(l1.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status'][1] == 'ONCHAIND:Tracking mutual close transaction')
l1.daemon.wait_for_logs([' to ONCHAIN'] * num_peers)
@unittest.skipIf(not DEVELOPER, "needs DEVELOPER=1")
def test_permfail(self):
@ -1166,19 +1166,19 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Their unilateral tx, old commit point')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/DELAYED_OUTPUT_TO_US by OUR_DELAYED_RETURN_TO_WALLET (.*) in 5 blocks')
wait_for(lambda: l1.rpc.listpeers(l2.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status']
== ['CHANNELD_NORMAL:Received error from peer: channel ALL: Internal error: Failing due to dev-fail command',
'ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL:Tracking their unilateral close',
'ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL:All outputs resolved: waiting 99 more blocks before forgetting channel'])
'ONCHAIND:Tracking their unilateral close',
'ONCHAIND:All outputs resolved: waiting 99 more blocks before forgetting channel'])
billboard = l2.rpc.listpeers(l1.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status']
assert len(billboard) == 2
assert billboard[0] == 'ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL:Tracking our own unilateral close'
assert re.fullmatch('ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL:.* outputs unresolved: in 4 blocks will spend DELAYED_OUTPUT_TO_US \(.*:0\) using OUR_DELAYED_RETURN_TO_WALLET', billboard[1])
assert billboard[0] == 'ONCHAIND:Tracking our own unilateral close'
assert re.fullmatch('ONCHAIND:.* outputs unresolved: in 4 blocks will spend DELAYED_OUTPUT_TO_US \(.*:0\) using OUR_DELAYED_RETURN_TO_WALLET', billboard[1])
# Now, mine 4 blocks so it sends out the spending tx.
bitcoind.generate_block(4)
@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
bitcoind.generate_block(95)
wait_forget_channels(l1)
wait_for(lambda: l2.rpc.listpeers(l1.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status'] == ['ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL:Tracking our own unilateral close', 'ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL:All outputs resolved: waiting 5 more blocks before forgetting channel'], timeout=1)
wait_for(lambda: l2.rpc.listpeers(l1.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'][0]['status'] == ['ONCHAIND:Tracking our own unilateral close', 'ONCHAIND:All outputs resolved: waiting 5 more blocks before forgetting channel'], timeout=1)
# Now, 100 blocks l2 should be done.
bitcoind.generate_block(5)
@ -1226,8 +1226,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('permfail')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
l1.bitcoin.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# 10 later, l1 should collect its to-self payment.
bitcoind.generate_block(10)
@ -1255,8 +1255,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
l1.bitcoin.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# 10 later, l1 should collect its to-self payment.
bitcoind.generate_block(10)
@ -1316,8 +1316,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('permfail')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
l1.bitcoin.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# We use 3 blocks for "reasonable depth"
bitcoind.generate_block(3)
@ -1369,8 +1369,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('permfail')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
l1.bitcoin.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# Wait for timeout.
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/DELAYED_OUTPUT_TO_US by OUR_DELAYED_RETURN_TO_WALLET .* in 5 blocks')
@ -1448,8 +1448,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
# l2 will drop to chain.
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
l1.bitcoin.generate_block(1)
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('OUR_UNILATERAL/THEIR_HTLC')
# l2 should fulfill HTLC onchain, and spend to-us (any order)
@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
bitcoind.rpc.sendrawtransaction(tx)
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_CHEATED')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# FIXME: l1 should try to stumble along!
wait_for(lambda: len(l2.getactivechannels()) == 0)
@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
bitcoind.rpc.sendrawtransaction(tx)
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_CHEATED')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# FIXME: l1 should try to stumble along!
# l2 should spend all of the outputs (except to-us).
@ -1623,8 +1623,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Their unilateral tx, new commit point')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/THEIR_HTLC by THEIR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TO_THEM \\(IGNORING\\) in 5 blocks')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Propose handling THEIR_UNILATERAL/OUR_HTLC by OUR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TO_US (.*) in 5 blocks')
@ -1659,8 +1659,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Their unilateral tx, old commit point')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/THEIR_HTLC by THEIR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TO_THEM \\(IGNORING\\) in 5 blocks')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Propose handling THEIR_UNILATERAL/OUR_HTLC by OUR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TO_US (.*) in 5 blocks')
# l2 then gets preimage, uses it instead of ignoring
@ -1701,8 +1701,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Their unilateral tx, old commit point')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_logs(['Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/OUR_HTLC by OUR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX \\(.*\\) in 5 blocks',
'Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/DELAYED_OUTPUT_TO_US by OUR_DELAYED_RETURN_TO_WALLET .* in 5 blocks'])
@ -2277,8 +2277,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('Offered HTLC 0 SENT_ADD_ACK_REVOCATION cltv .* hit deadline')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
l1.bitcoin.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# L1 will timeout HTLC immediately
l1.daemon.wait_for_logs(['Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/OUR_HTLC by OUR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX .* in 0 blocks',
@ -2332,8 +2332,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('Fulfilled HTLC 0 SENT_REMOVE_COMMIT cltv .* hit deadline')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
l2.bitcoin.generate_block(1)
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_OUR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
# L2 will collect HTLC
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('Propose handling OUR_UNILATERAL/THEIR_HTLC by OUR_HTLC_SUCCESS_TX .* in 0 blocks')
@ -3016,7 +3016,7 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
# L1 must notice.
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_THEIR_UNILATERAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
@unittest.skipIf(not DEVELOPER, "needs DEVELOPER=1")
def test_payment_success_persistence(self):
@ -3294,8 +3294,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_MUTUAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_MUTUAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
bitcoind.generate_block(99)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('onchaind complete, forgetting peer')
@ -3410,8 +3410,8 @@ class LightningDTests(BaseLightningDTests):
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('sendrawtx exit 0')
bitcoind.generate_block(1)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_MUTUAL')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIND_MUTUAL')
l1.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
l2.daemon.wait_for_log(' to ONCHAIN')
bitcoind.generate_block(99)
l1.daemon.wait_for_log('onchaind complete, forgetting peer')

2
wallet/db.c
View File

@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ char *dbmigrations[] = {
"CREATE TABLE db_upgrades (upgrade_from INTEGER, lightning_version TEXT);",
/* We used not to clean up peers when their channels were gone. */
"DELETE FROM peers WHERE id NOT IN (SELECT peer_id FROM channels);",
/* The ONCHAIND_CHEATED/THEIR_UNILATERAL/OUR_UNILATERAL/MUTUAL are now one */
"UPDATE channels SET STATE = 8 WHERE state > 8;",
NULL,
};

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save