We usually did this, but sometimes they were named after what they did,
rather than what they cleaned up.
There are still a few exceptions:
1. I didn't bother creating destroy_xxx wrappers for htable routines
which already existed.
2. Sometimes destructors really are used for side-effects (eg. to simply
mark that something was freed): these are clearer with boutique names.
3. Generally destructors are static, but they don't need to be: in some
cases we attach a destructor then remove it later, or only attach
to *some* cases. These are best with qualifiers in the destroy_<type>
name.
Suggested-by: @ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Maintaining it was always fraught, since the command could go away
if the JSON RPC died. Most recently, it was broken again on shutdown
(see below).
In future we may allow pay commands to block on previous payments, so
it won't even be a 1:1 mapping. Generalize it: keep commands in a
simple list and do a lookup when a payment fails/succeeds.
Valgrind error file: valgrind-errors.5732
==5732== Invalid read of size 8
==5732== at 0x4149FD: remove_cmd_from_hout (pay.c:292)
==5732== by 0x468BAB: notify (tal.c:237)
==5732== by 0x469077: del_tree (tal.c:400)
==5732== by 0x4690C7: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==5732== by 0x46948A: tal_free (tal.c:509)
==5732== by 0x40F1EA: main (lightningd.c:362)
==5732== Address 0x69df148 is 1,512 bytes inside a block of size 1,544 free'd
==5732== at 0x4C2EDEB: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==5732== by 0x469150: del_tree (tal.c:421)
==5732== by 0x46948A: tal_free (tal.c:509)
==5732== by 0x4198F2: free_htlcs (peer_control.c:1281)
==5732== by 0x40EBA9: shutdown_subdaemons (lightningd.c:209)
==5732== by 0x40F1DE: main (lightningd.c:360)
==5732== Block was alloc'd at
==5732== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==5732== by 0x468C30: allocate (tal.c:250)
==5732== by 0x4691F7: tal_alloc_ (tal.c:448)
==5732== by 0x40A279: new_htlc_out (htlc_end.c:143)
==5732== by 0x41FD64: send_htlc_out (peer_htlcs.c:397)
==5732== by 0x41511C: send_payment (pay.c:388)
==5732== by 0x41589E: json_sendpay (pay.c:513)
==5732== by 0x40D9B1: parse_request (jsonrpc.c:600)
==5732== by 0x40DCAC: read_json (jsonrpc.c:667)
==5732== by 0x45C706: next_plan (io.c:59)
==5732== by 0x45D1DD: do_plan (io.c:387)
==5732== by 0x45D21B: io_ready (io.c:397)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Such an htlc is invalid, and will be failed cleanly by our channeld
(which also checks that it meets the minimum amount), but it's
not the master's job to check it, and in fact, it asserts if we were
to try to pay or forward such a thing.
Fixes: #686
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For performance, we delay entering the 'wallet_payment' into the db
until we actually commit to the HTLC (when we have to touch the DB
anyway).
This opens a race where we can try to pay twice, and since it's not in
the database yet, we don't notice the duplicate.
So remove the temporary payment field from htlc_out, which was always
an uncomfortable hack, and make the wallet code abstract over the
deferred entry a little by maintaining a 'unstored_payments' list
and incorporating that in results.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We set hout->key.id when channeld tells us what it is, but if channeld
dies before that we free the hout, and our destructor logs it:
Valgrind error file: valgrind-errors.20312
==20312== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==20312== at 0x53ABC9B: _itoa_word (_itoa.c:179)
==20312== by 0x53B041F: vfprintf (vfprintf.c:1642)
==20312== by 0x53B17D5: buffered_vfprintf (vfprintf.c:2330)
==20312== by 0x53AEAA5: vfprintf (vfprintf.c:1301)
==20312== by 0x53B7D63: fprintf (fprintf.c:32)
==20312== by 0x128BAC: hout_subd_died (peer_htlcs.c:316)
==20312== by 0x16D8E0: notify (tal.c:240)
==20312== by 0x16DD95: del_tree (tal.c:400)
==20312== by 0x16DDE7: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==20312== by 0x16DDE7: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==20312== by 0x16E1B4: tal_free (tal.c:509)
==20312== by 0x162B5C: io_close (io.c:443)
==20312== by 0x12D563: sd_msg_read (subd.c:508)
==20312== by 0x161EA5: next_plan (io.c:59)
==20312== by 0x1629A2: do_plan (io.c:387)
==20312== by 0x1629E0: io_ready (io.c:397)
==20312== by 0x164319: io_loop (poll.c:305)
==20312== by 0x118E21: main (lightningd.c:334)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a primitive mark-and-sweep-style garbage detector. The core is
in common/ for later use by subdaemons, but for now it's just lightningd.
We initialize it before most other allocations.
We walk the tal tree to get all the pointers, then search the `ld`
object for those pointers, recursing down. Some specific helpers are
required for hashtables (which stash bits in the unused pointer bits,
so won't be found).
There's `notleak()` for annotating things that aren't leaks: things
like globals and timers, and other semi-transients.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This addresses a performance regression introduced by
6ceb375650. We were storing it in an
otherwise empty DB transaction, which means that DB transaction was no
longer a no-op. Now we defer storing until we need to store the
corresponding HTLC anyway, so we can just piggyback on top of that
transaction.
This is also more consistent since we'd be forgetting the payment
anyway if we restart between adding the HTLC and committing to it.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Also, we split the more sophisticated json_add helpers to avoid pulling in
everything into lightning-cli, and unify the routines to print struct
short_channel_id (it's ':', not '/' too).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the case where we can't decrypt the onion, we can't fail it in the
normal way (which is encrypted using the onion shared secret), we need
to respond with a update_fail_malformed_htlc message.
Moreover, we need to remember this for persistence. This means that
we really have three conclusions for an HTLC: fulfilled, failed,
malformed. Fix up the logic everywhere which assumed failed or
fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They share some fields, but they're basically different, and it's clearest
to treat them differently in most places.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We *should* split the struct into key and data, rather than only comparing
the key parts in the htlc_end_eq function. But meanwhile, this fixes
the code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This lets us link HTLCs from one peer to another; but for the moment it
simply means we can adjust balance when an HTLC is fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
practicalswift
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker