And fix trivial typo in MAKING-RELEASES.md, and date retreival in
build-release.sh and repro-build.sh (real git tags start with v!)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
New name is less confusing, and most people should be transitioning to
listpays rather than this anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is to future-proof against multi-part-payments: the low-level commands
will start returning multiple results once we have that, so prepare
transition plan now.
Closes: #2372
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the same deprecation, but one level up. For the moment, we
still support invoices with a `h` field (where description will be
necessary) but that will be removed once this option is removed.
Note that I just changed pylightning without backwards compatibility,
since the field was unlikely to be used, but we could do something
more complex here?
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This field was used by `pay` to hold the bolt11 description if the bolt11
string used `h` to hash the description (which nobody ever did). If the
`h` field wasn't present, it could contain anything, as it wasn't checked.
It's really useful to have a label for payments (eg. '1 Cuban'), but adding
yet-another option would be painful, so we simply rename 'description'
to 'label' except inside the db.
This means we need to do some tricky parameter parsing to handle array
and keyword JSON arguments, but only until we remove the old name.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without this, there's no proof of payment, since it is the signed invoice
that make the receipt valid.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I tried to fundchannel 0.01btc, and of course it wanted 8 decimals exactly.
If I can't get this right, it's probably a bad idea.
I still don't allow whole number of btc though, since that's probably a mistake
and you're not supposed to put that much in c-lightning yet :)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular this matches the case of `their_unilateral/to_us` outputs, which
were missing their addresses so far.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Little point having users handle the postfixes manually, this
translates them, and also allows Millisatoshi to be used wherever an
'int' would be previously.
There are also helpers to create the formatting in a way c-lightning's
JSONRPC will accept.
All standard arithmetic operations with integers work.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
LND seems to do this occasionally, though fixed in new versions. Workaround
in the meantime.
I tested this by hacking our code to send it prematurely, and this worked.
Fixes: #2219
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to still accept it when parsing the database, but this flag
should allow upgrade testing for devs building on top
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Also one less headache for reproducible builds. But unlike
libsodium, this only seems common in Ubuntu.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Up until now, riskfactor was useless due to implementation bugs, and
also the default setting is wrong (too low to have an effect on
reasonable payment scenarios).
Let's simplify the definition (by assuming that P(failure) of a node
is 1), to make it a simple percentage. I examined the current network
fees to see what would work, and under this definition, a default of
10 seems reasonable (equivalent to 1000 under the old definition).
It is *this* change which finally fixes our test case! The riskfactor
is now 40msat (1500000 * 14 * 10 / 5259600 = 39.9), comparable with
worst-case fuzz is 50msat (1001 * 0.05 = 50).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were only comparing by total msatoshis.
Note, this *still* isn't sufficient to fix our indirect problem, as
our risk values are all 1 (the minimum):
lightning_gossipd(25480): 2 hop solution: 1501990 + 2
lightning_gossipd(25480): 3 hop solution: 1501971 + 3
...
lightning_gossipd(25480): => chose 3 hop solution
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the direct cause of the failure of the original
test_pay_direct test and it makes sense: invoice routehints may not be
necessary, so try without them *first* rather than last.
We didn't mention the use of routehints in CHANGELOG at all yet, so
do that now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Don't do this:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f37ae667c40 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1
#1 0x00007f37ae668b38 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1
#2 0x00007f37ae669907 in deflate () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1
#3 0x00007f37ae674c65 in compress2 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1
#4 0x000000000040cfe3 in zencode_scids (ctx=0xc1f118, scids=0x2599bc49 "\a\325{", len=176320) at gossipd/gossipd.c:218
#5 0x000000000040d0b3 in encode_short_channel_ids_end (encoded=0x7fff8f98d9f0, max_bytes=65490) at gossipd/gossipd.c:236
#6 0x000000000040dd28 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290511, number_of_blocks=8) at gossipd/gossipd.c:576
#7 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290511, number_of_blocks=16) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#8 0x000000000040ddee in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290495, number_of_blocks=32) at gossipd/gossipd.c:596
#9 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290495, number_of_blocks=64) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#10 0x000000000040ddee in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290431, number_of_blocks=128) at gossipd/gossipd.c:596
#11 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290431, number_of_blocks=256) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#12 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290431, number_of_blocks=512) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#13 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17290431, number_of_blocks=1024) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#14 0x000000000040ddee in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=2047) at gossipd/gossipd.c:596
#15 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=4095) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#16 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=8191) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#17 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=16382) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#18 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=32764) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#19 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=65528) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#20 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=131056) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#21 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=262112) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#22 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=524225) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#23 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=1048450) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#24 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=2096900) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#25 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=4193801) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#26 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=8387603) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#27 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=17289408, number_of_blocks=16775207) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#28 0x000000000040ddee in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=33550414) at gossipd/gossipd.c:596
#29 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=67100829) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#30 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=134201659) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#31 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=268403318) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#32 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=536806636) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#33 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=1073613273) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#34 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=2147226547) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#35 0x000000000040ddc6 in queue_channel_ranges (peer=0x3868fc8, first_blocknum=514201, number_of_blocks=4294453094) at gossipd/gossipd.c:595
#36 0x000000000040df26 in handle_query_channel_range (peer=0x3868fc8, msg=0x37e0678 "\001\ao\342\214\n\266\361\263r\301\246\242F\256c\367O\223\036\203e\341Z\b\234h\326\031") at gossipd/gossipd.c:625
The cause was that converting a block number to an scid truncates it
at 24 bits. When we look through the index from (truncated number) to
(real end number) we get every channel, which is too large to encode,
so we iterate again.
This fixes both that problem, and also the issue that we'd end up
dividing into many empty sections until we get to the highest block
number. Instead, we just tack the empty blocks on to then end of the
final query.
(My initial version requested 0xFFFFFFFE blocks, but the dev code
which records what blocks were returned can't make a bitmap that big
on 32 bit).
Reported-by: George Vaccaro
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
seed isn't very useful at this level: I've left it in routing.c
because it might be useful for detailed testing. Pretty sure it's unused,
so I simply removed it.
The fuzzpercent is documented to default at 5%, but actually was 75%.
Fix that too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we are planning to release a bug fix release, and the plugin
subsystem is not yet complete, it is better to make plugin support
opt-in while we continue testing.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When the next node tells us the onion is malformed, we now actually
report the failcode to lightningd (rather than generating an invalid
error as we do now).
We could generate the onion at this point, but except we don't know
the shared secret; we'd have to plumb that through from the incoming
channeld's HTLC.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Funder can't spend the fee it needs to pay for the commitment transaction:
we were not converting to millisatoshis, however!
This breaks our routeboost test, which no longer has sufficient funds
to make payment.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We have an incompatibility with lnd it seems: I've lost channels on
reconnect with 'sync error'. Since I never got this code to be reliable,
disable it for next release since I suspect it's our fault :(
And reenable the check which didn't work, for others to untangle.
I couldn't get option_data_loss_protect to be reliable, and I disabled
the check. This was a mistake, I should have either spent even more
time trying to get to the bottom of this (especially, writing test
vectors for the spec and testing against other implementations).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
lisa neigut
Conor Scott