Generally I prefer structures over u8, since the size is enforced at
runtime; and in several places we were doing conversions as the code
using Sphinx does treat struct secret as type of the secret.
Note that passing an array is the same as passing the address, so
changing from 'u8 secret[32]' to 'struct secret secret' means various
'secret' parameters change to '&secret'. Technically, '&secret' also
would have worked before, since '&' is a noop on array, but that's
always seemed a bit weird.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes it clear we're dealing with a message which is a wrapped error
reply (needing unwrap_onionreply), not an already-wrapped one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is needed to fully implement handling of blockheight disagreements
between us and payee.
If payee believes the blockheight is higher than ours, then `pay`
should wait for our node to achieve that blockheight.
Changelog-Add: Implement `waitblockheight` to wait for a specific blockheight.
Add towire_int() and fromwire_int() functions to "(de)serialize"
"int". This will only work as long as both the caller of towire_int()
and the caller of fromwire_int() use the same in-memory representation
of signed integers and have the same sizeof(int).
Changelog-None
Add "peer not connected" and "unknown peer" as error codes, so that
users can check against numeric error codes instead of textual error
messages.
Will ease https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/3366
Changelog-None
`wallet_payment_store` would free the `wallet_payment` instance which would
then cause us to reload it from the DB. Instead of doing the store->free->load
dance we now tell `wallet_payment_store` whether it should take ownership and
leave it alone if not.
Passing the payment around instead of referencing it through payment_hash and
partid is a nice side-effect.
`wallet_payment_store` frees the unstored payment after it has stored it, but
we still need that instance for our notifications. This is the smallest
possible fix, but I plan to refactor this out.
Changelog-Changed: plugin: `notify_sendpay_success` and `notify_sendpay_failure` are now always called, even if there is no command waiting on the result.
This lets us do more flexible filtering in the next patch. But it also
keeps some weird logic out of gossipd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This increments the `data_version` upon committing dirty transactions, reads
the last data_version upon startup, and tracks the number in memory in
parallel to the DB (see next commit for rationale).
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: Added a `data_version` field to the `db_write` hook which returns a numeric transaction counter.
it's that time of year (merry xmas!)
enables the ability to push_msat on fundchannel
Changelog-Added: RPC: `fundchannel` and `fundchannel_start` can now accept an optional parameter, `push_msat`, which will gift that amount of satoshis to the peer at channel open.
Thanks to @t-bast, who made this possible by interop testing with Eclair!
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive TLV-style onion messages.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive BOLT11 payment_secrets.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now receive basic multi-part payments.
Changelog-Added: RPC: low-level commands sendpay and waitsendpay can now be used to manually send multi-part payments.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise tests for hold_invoice fail on Travis (they use 180 / 2 as
the timeout, and we free it after 70 seconds).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the final step: we pass the complete fee_states to and from
channeld.
Changelog-Fixed: "Bad commitment signature" closing channels when we sent back-to-back update_fee messages across multiple reconnects.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Bastien TEINTURIER <bastien@acinq.fr> writes:
> One thing I noticed but didn't investigate much: after sending the two
> payments, I tried using `waitsendpay` and it reported an error *208*
> (*"Never attempted payment for
> '98ee736d29d860948e436546a88b0cc84f267de8818531b0fdbe6ce3d080f22a'"*).
>
> I was expecting the result to be something like: "payment succeeded for
> that payment hash" (the HTLCs were correctly settled).
Indeed, if you waitsendpay without specifying a partid, you are waiting
for 0, which may not exist. Clarify the error msg.
Reported-by: @t-bast
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Bastien TEINTURIER <bastien@acinq.fr> writes:
> It looks like the split on c-lightning side is quite limited at the moment:
> the only option is to split a payment in exactly its two halves,
> otherwise I get rejected because of the rule of overpaying more than
> twice the amount?
We only tested exactly two equal-size payments; indeed, our finalhop
test was backwards. We only complain if the final hop pays more than
twice msat (technically, this test is still too loose for mpp: the
spec says we should sum to the exact amount).
Reported-by: @t-bast
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The invoice_try_pay code now takes a set, rather than a single htlc, but
it's basically the same thing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
AFAICT this only "worked" previously because replay htlc simply failed
them all (no peers are currently connected). With upcoming changes
(foreshadowed by the comment) this is no longer true:
Attempting to prepare a db_stmt outside of a transaction: wallet/invoices.c:373
lightningd: FATAL SIGNAL 6 (version v0.7.3-188-g45b0af4-modded)
0x55b475590a73 send_backtrace
common/daemon.c:41
0x55b475590b1d crashdump
common/daemon.c:54
0x7f16c557b46f ???
???:0
0x7f16c557b3eb ???
???:0
0x7f16c555a898 ???
???:0
0x55b475564c8f fatal
lightningd/log.c:814
0x55b4755c3ed5 db_prepare_v2_
wallet/db.c:605
0x55b4755c76b5 invoices_find_unpaid
wallet/invoices.c:373
0x55b4755ce91c wallet_invoice_find_unpaid
wallet/wallet.c:1990
0x55b47555861f invoice_check_payment
lightningd/invoice.c:257
0x55b475557a7c htlc_add_set
lightningd/htlc_set.c:112
0x55b47557b294 handle_localpay
lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:332
0x55b47557c63c htlc_accepted_hook_callback
lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:857
0x55b475585573 plugin_hook_call_
lightningd/plugin_hook.c:118
0x55b47557c747 plugin_hook_call_htlc_accepted
lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:882
0x55b47557ca3e peer_accepted_htlc
lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:991
0x55b47557ffb9 htlcs_resubmit
lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:2131
0x55b4755620f7 main
lightningd/lightningd.c:801
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This isn't plumbed in yet, but the idea is that every htlc gets put
into a "set" and then we process them once the set is satisfied. For
the !EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES, the set is simply always size 1.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We now return the same error for various "does not match this
invoice", so it makes sense to encapsulate these checks. We'll also
want to expose this for multi-part payments.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Explicit #if EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES check in case we enable them at different
times, but it requires a payment_secret since we put them in the same field.
This incidently stops it working on legacy nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
msatoshi was used to indicate the amount the invoice asked for, but
for parallel sendpay it's required, as it allows our sanity check of
limiting the total payments in flight, ie. it becomes
'total_msat'.
There's a special case for sendonion, which always tells us the value is 0.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently refuse a payment if one is already in flight. For parallel
payments, it's a bit more subtle: we want to refuse if it we already have
the total-amount-of-invoice in flight.
So we get all the current payments, and sum the pending ones.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular, we're about to do surgery on the detection-of-previous-payments
logic, and we should not do this in two places.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a transient field, so rework things so we don't leave it in
struct htlc_out. Instead, load htlc_in first and connect htlc_out to
them as we go.
This also changes one place where we use it instead of the am_origin
flag.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is in preparation for partial payments. For existing payments,
partid is 0 (to match the corresponding payment).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is in preparation for partial payments. For existing payments,
partid is 0 (arbitrarity) and total_msat is msatoshi.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Because my node runs under valgrind, it can take quite a while to
sync; nodes tend to disconnect and reconnect if you block too long.
This is particularly problematic since we often update fees: when the
other side sends its commitment_signed we block.
In particular, this triggers the corner case we have where we
update_fee twice, disconnecting each time, and our state machine gets
confused (which is why we never saw this exact corner case before this
change in 0.7.3!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
ZmnSCPxj jxPCSnmZ
Rusty Russell
darosior
Vasil Dimov
Christian Decker
lisa neigut