For memory-usage reasons, struct chan doesn't use a tal destructor, in
favor of us calling free_chan in the right places.
In DEVELOPER mode, we should check that is the case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are some more #if DEVELOPER one-liners coming, this makes them
clear, but still lets them stand out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We've been slack, but it's going to be important for testing
ratelimiting. And it currently has a minor memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Thanks clang! Here's the error:
ommon/wireaddr.c:359:14: error: variable 'addr' is used uninitialized whenever
'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
} else if (addrinfo->ai_family == AF_INET6) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
common/wireaddr.c:364:25: note: uninitialized use occurs here
tal_arr_expand(addrs, addr);
^~~~
./common/utils.h:27:16: note: expanded from macro 'tal_arr_expand'
(*(p))[n] = (s); \
^
common/wireaddr.c:359:10: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
} else if (addrinfo->ai_family == AF_INET6) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
common/wireaddr.c:354:3: note: variable 'addr' is declared here
struct wireaddr addr;
^
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
After switching to a plugin, we verify that we can fund a channel
before we check to contact a peer. We'll need to have a funded wallet
to pass the check in this test that verifies that 'fundchannel' cannot
be called for a peer after fundchannel_start is.
in order to preserve current behavior, we cap at max if specified 'all';
otherwise we fail since the amount requested is larger than the
channel max capacity
Previously, we'd fail on 'all'. `fundchannel_start` needs an amount
in order to start a funding transaction.
The way that we approach this is to first call `txprepare` with a
placeholder address and the 'all' amount; this will return the maximum
amount available. We then clamp this to the max_funding (currently
hardcoded, in the future we'd want to consult our/the peer's features) and
then use the amount on the output in the prepared transaction as the
funding amount. We then pass this amount to fundchannel_start,
after we've started it successfully we cancel the held placeholder
transaction and prepare a second transaction for the exact amount,
using the funding address that fundchannel_start passed back.
When the peer sends back an error, we return null, but sending
a NULL message back to lightningd causes a parsing error on their
side. negotiation_failed already calls back the peer, all we need
to do here is exit.
Allow a user to select the utxo set that will be added to a
transaction, via the `utxos` parameter. Optional.
Format for utxos should be of the form ["txid:vout","..."]
For now, we can't fully ensure that the broadcast was catched from a third pary. Only when the transaction (broadcast by a third pary) is onchain, we can catch it.
(The json when sendpay successes is too different when sendpay fails, so
divide the sendpay result into two notifications: `sendpay_success` and
`sendpay_failure`)
`sendpay_failure`
A notification for topic `sendpay_failure` is sent every time a sendpay
success(with `failed` status). The json is same as the return value of
command `sendpay`/`waitsendpay` when this cammand fails.
```json
{
"sendpay_failure": {
"code": 204,
"message": "failed: WIRE_UNKNOWN_NEXT_PEER (reply from remote)",
"data": {
"id": 2,
"payment_hash": "9036e3bdbd2515f1e653cb9f22f8e4c49b73aa2c36e937c926f43e33b8db8851",
"destination": "035d2b1192dfba134e10e540875d366ebc8bc353d5aa766b80c090b39c3a5d885d",
"msatoshi": 100000000,
"amount_msat": "100000000msat",
"msatoshi_sent": 100001001,
"amount_sent_msat": "100001001msat",
"created_at": 1561395134,
"status": "failed",
"erring_index": 1,
"failcode": 16394,
"failcodename": "WIRE_UNKNOWN_NEXT_PEER",
"erring_node": "022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59",
"erring_channel": "103x2x1",
"erring_direction": 0
}
}
}
```
`sendpay` doesn't wait for the result of sendpay and `waitsendpay`
returns the result of sendpay in specified time or timeout, but
`sendpay_failure` will always return the result anytime when sendpay
fails if is was subscribed.
pPayment field includes the basic information of the payment, so the return valves of 'sendpay_success()' and 'sendpay_fail()' should include this field.
Note "immediate_routing_failure" is before payment creation, and for this case, return won't include payment fields.
`sendpay_success`
A notification for topic `sendpay_success` is sent every time a sendpay
success(with `complete` status). The json is same as the return value of
command `sendpay`/`waitsendpay` when these cammand succeeds.
```json
{
"sendpay_success": {
"id": 1,
"payment_hash": "5c85bf402b87d4860f4a728e2e58a2418bda92cd7aea0ce494f11670cfbfb206",
"destination": "035d2b1192dfba134e10e540875d366ebc8bc353d5aa766b80c090b39c3a5d885d",
"msatoshi": 100000000,
"amount_msat": "100000000msat",
"msatoshi_sent": 100001001,
"amount_sent_msat": "100001001msat",
"created_at": 1561390572,
"status": "complete",
"payment_preimage": "9540d98095fd7f37687ebb7759e733934234d4f934e34433d4998a37de3733ee"
}
}
```
`sendpay` doesn't wait for the result of sendpay and `waitsendpay`
returns the result of sendpay in specified time or timeout, but
`sendpay_success` will always return the result anytime when sendpay
successes if is was subscribed.
Rusty Russell
darosior
lisa neigut
trueptolemy
trueptolemy