We don't preserve detailed asset information at the moment, so provide a
way to convert from a sat to an amount_asset struct.
We also need a way to convert from an 'amount_asset' to a 'value' for
elements, which for explicit (i.e. non-blinded) asssets is a 0x01 prefix
plus the big-endian encoded value.
Our existing coin_moves tracking logic assumed that any tx we had an
input in belonged to *all* of our wallet (not a bad assumption as long
as there was no way to update a tx that spends our wallets)
Now that we've got `signpsbt` implemented, however, we need to be
careful about how we account for withdrawals. For now we do a best guess
at what the feerate is, and lump all of our spent outputs as a
'withdrawal' when it's impossible to disambiguate
It returns NULL, so you can simply `return fromwire_fail(...)`
if you want to return NULL in this case. Use that more.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We did this originally because these types are referred to in the bolts, and we
had no way of injecting the correct include lines into those. Now we do, so
there's less excuse for this.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Currently the only source for amount_asset is the value getter on a tx output,
and we don't hand it too far around (mainly ignoring it if it isn't the
chain's main currency). Eventually we could bubble them up to the wallet, use
them to select outputs or actually support assets in the channels.
Since we don't hand them around too widely I thought it was ok for them to be
pass-by-value rather than having to allocate them and pass them around by
reference. They're just 41 bytes currently so the overhead should be ok.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
This fixes block parsing on testnet; specifically, non-standard tx versions.
We hit a type bug in libwally (wallt_get_secp_context()) which I had to
work around for the moment, and the updated libsecp adds an optional hash
function arg to the ECDH function.
Fixes: #2563
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We probably also want to call secp_randomise/wally_secp_randomize here
too, and since these calls all call setup_tmpctx, it probably makes
sense to have a helper function to do all that. Until thats done, I
modified the tests so grepping will show the places where the sequence
of calls is repeated.
Signed-off-by: Jon Griffiths <jon_p_griffiths@yahoo.com>
To be safe, we should never memcmp secrets. We don't do this
currently outside tests, but we're about to.
The tests to prove this as constant time are the tricky bit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Often we only need a single secret, so it's clearer to have routines
to do just that. When we change to the lnd key scheme, there will be
no benefit in calculating them all together.
This also adds a test!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
niftynei
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Lawrence Nahum
Jon Griffiths