We were nesting like the following:
```json
{"params": {
"rpc_command": {
"rpc_command": {
}
}
}
```
This is really excessive, so we unwrap once, and now have the following:
```json
{"params": {
"rpc_command": {
}
}
```
Still more wrapping than necessary (the method is repeated in the `params`
object), but it's getting closer.
Changelog-Deprecated: JSON-RPC: Removed double wrapping of `rpc_command` payload in `rpc_command` JSON field.
Suggested-by: @fiatjaf
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
Make the `htlc_accepted` hook the first chained hook in our repertoire. The
plugins are called one after the other in order until we have no more plugins
or the HTLC was handled by one of the plugins. If no plugins handles the HTLC
we continue to handle it internally like always.
Handling in this case means the plugin returns either `{"result": "resolve",
...}` or `{"result": "fail", ...}`.
Changelog-Changed: plugin: Multiple plugins can now register for the htlc_accepted hook.
This completes the custommsg epic, finally we are back where we began all that
time ago (about 4 hours really...): in a plugin that implements some custom
logic.
We clone the test above, but this time we don't attach waiters (they'd be racy
anyway), and we wait for the notification to be called. This fails, but is
fixed in the next two commits.
Rounds out the application of `upfront_shutdown_script`, allowing
an accepting node to specify a close_to address.
Prior to this, only the opening node could specify one.
Changelog-Added: Plugins: Allow the 'accepter' to specify an upfront_shutdown_script for a channel via a `close_to` field in the openchannel hook result
This adapts the test to the new 'plugin' command: no more sleeping,
since we are synchronous !
This tests the timeout by increasing the 'slowinit' plugin sleep
duration at init reception.
This adds a broken plugin to make sure we won't crash because of a
misbehaving plugin (unmet dependency is the most common case).
This has a slight side-effect of removing the actual begin and commit
statements from the `db_write` hooks, but they are mostly redundant anyway (no
harm in grouping pre-init statements into one transaction, and we know that
each post-init call is supposed to be wrapped anyway).
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We seem to be getting intermittant failures, but it's hard
to disgnose. Simplify it by moving all the test logic into
the test itself, and making the plugin dumber. This means we'll
see exactly what the differences are if it fails again.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We recently noticed that the way we unpack the call arguments for hooks and
notifications in pylightning breaks pretty quickly once you start changing the
hook and notification params. If you add params they will not get mapped
correctly causing the plugin to error out.
This can be fixed by adding a `VAR_KEYWORD` argument to the calbacks, i.e., by
adding a single `**kwargs` argument at the end of the signature. This commit
adds a check that such a catch-all argument exists, and emits a warning if it
doesn't.
It also fixes up the plugins that we ship ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We were having a few issues with malformed data in the past, so this time we
really check that stuff.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
1. Create a plugin: ./lightning/tests/plugins/pretend_badlog.py
This plugin subscribes 'warning' notification and log the payload of
'warning';
2. Add a new test: tests/test_plugin.py::test_warning_notification
This test runs the plugin-pretend_badlog.py and check if 'warning'
notification can be normal triggered and subscribed.
I misunderstood the API, this ended up nesting a result inside the JSON-RPC
result.
No concerns about backwards compatibility since this is so new.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We should be able to pass UTF-8 strings to and from plugins without
python turning them into JSON-\u escapes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't, but we should, like we do for normal RPC. However, I chose
to use function annotations, rather than names-ending-in-'msat'
because it's more Pythony.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
lisa neigut
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell
darosior
trueptolemy
trueptolemy
Simon Vrouwe