Simplification of the offset calculation to use the rescan parameter, and rename
of `wallet_first_blocknum`. We now use either relative rescan from our last
known location, or absolute if a negative rescan was given. It's all handled in
a single location (except the case in which the blockcount is below our
precomputed offset), so this should reduce surprises.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is a big simplification, we just report the DBs current blockchain height
as the point to continue scanning, or the passed in default. No more guessing
where to continue from or whether the wallet was used and when it first saw the
light of day.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The only use for these was to compute their txids so we could notify depth
in case of reorgs.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Repeated crashes could result in the `last_processed_block` variable being
pushed further and further into the past (in some cases going as far back as
scanning blocks from 2012...). This is a stop-gap solution that just lower
bounds the value to what is the first possible block we might be interested in
LN, until we have the 0-rescan fix I'm working on.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
There are two very hard problems in software engineering:
1. Off-by-one errors
In this case we were rolling back further than needed and we were starting the
catchup one block further than expected.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
So we know how much counterparty could theoretically steal from us
(msatoshi_to_us - msatoshi_to_us_min) and how much we could
theoretically steal from counterparty (msatoshi_to_us_max -
msatoshi_to_us).
For more piloting goodness.
This fixes the root cause of https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/1212
where we deleted the payment because we wanted to retry, then retry failed
so we had an (old) HTLC without a matching payment. We then fed that
HTLC to onchaind, which tells us it's missing, and we try to fail the
payment and deref a NULL pointer.
Fixes: #1212
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This simplifies things, and means it's always in the database. Our
previous approach to creating it on the fly had holes when it was
created for onchaind, causing us to use another every time we
restarted.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Our testing also reveals a bug: we start lightningd and shut it down
before fully processing the blockchain, so we don't set
last_processed_block. Fix that by setting it immediately once we have
a block: worst case it goes backwards a little.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When we already know about an output we would stop scanning the remaining
outputs. Known outputs happen whenever we extracted from our own transactions
and then extracted again from blocks. We would not update if the first update
fails.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Will be used later to filter out outputs we are interested in, and
trigger db updates with them.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
ZmnSCPxj
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell
practicalswift
Igor Cota