Changelog-Fixed: Passing 0 as minconf to withdraw allows you to use unconfirmed transaction outputs, even if explicitly passed as the `utxos` parameter
Didn't generally fixup inside comments and the bech32 code: reformatting that
is just anti-social.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If you're replaying or syncing with the blockchain, show that error
instead of 'cannot afford', in the case of not having enough utxos
to pay for a transaction. This is the 'more correct' error to show, as
there's a chance that the funds you're expecting to spend are in the
portion of the blockchain that hasn't been synced yet.
Allow a user to select the utxo set that will be added to a
transaction, via the `utxos` parameter. Optional.
Format for utxos should be of the form ["txid:vout","..."]
This new parameter takes a list of outpoints (as txid:vout) and fund a channel from the corresponding utxos.
Example : fundchannel <id> 10000 normal 1 [10767f0db0e568127fffd7f70a154d4599f42d62babf63230a7c3378bfce3cb0:0, c9e040e0b5fc8c59d5e7834108fbc5583001f414dd83faf0a05cff9d1a92d32c:0]
We currently allocate utxos off cmd, but the next commit will persist a
wtx beyond the command which created it, breaking that assumption.
In general, a struct member should be owned by the struct itself, and
a tal context should be an explicit arg, not implicit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This allows us to specify that an output must have been confirmed before the
given maximum height. This allows us to specify a minimum number of
confirmations for an output to be selected.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Using param_tok is generally deprecated, as it doesn't give any sanity checking
for the JSON 'check' command. So make param_wtx usable directly, and
also make it have a struct amount_sat.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
json_escaped.[ch], param.[ch] and jsonrpc_errors.h move from lightningd/
to common/. Tests moved too.
We add a new 'common/json_tok.[ch]' for the common parameter parsing
routines which a plugin might want, taking them out of
lightningd/json.c (which now only contains the lightningd-specific
ones).
The rest is mainly fixing up includes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This also highlights the danger of searching the logs: that error
appeared previously in the logs, so we didn't notice that the actual
withdraw call gave a different error.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The easiest way to do this is to play with the 'wallet_tx' semantics
and have 'amount' have meaning even when 'all_funds' is set.
Note that we change the string 'Cannot afford funding transaction' to
'Cannot afford transaction' as this code is also used for withdrawls.
Inspired-by: molz on #c-lightning
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
New codes: FUND_MAX_EXCEEDED, FUND_CANNOT_AFFORD, FUND_DUST_LIMIT_UNMET.
The error message "Cannot afford fee" was not exactly correct because
it would also occur if the amount requested could not be afforded. So
I changed it to the more generic "Cannot afford transaction".
Other things:
* Fixed off-by-one satoshi in fundchannel manpage.
* Changed 'arror' to 'error' because we are not pirates.
Until now, `command_fail()` reported an error code of -1 for all uses.
This PR adds an `int code` parameter to `command_fail()`, requiring the
caller to explicitly include the error code.
This is part of #1464.
The majority of the calls are used during parameter validation and
their error code is now JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS.
The rest of the calls report an error code of LIGHTNINGD, which I defined to
-1 in `jsonrpc_errors.h`. The intention here is that as we improve our error
reporting, all occurenaces of LIGHTNINGD will go away and we can eventually
remove it.
I also converted calls to `command_fail_detailed()` that took a `NULL` `data`
parameter to use the new `command_fail()`.
The only difference from an end user perspecive is that bad input errors that
used to be -1 will now be -32602 (JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS).
No new functionality, just a continuation of my work toward completing #665.
I removed the common members of `struct withdrawal` and `struct fund_channel`
and placed them in a new `struct wallet_tx`. Then it was fairly straightforward
to reimplement the existing code in terms of `wallet_tx`.
Since I made some structural changes I wanted to get this approved before I
go any farther.
Added 'all' to fundchannel help message.
darosior
Rusty Russell
Vasil Dimov
lisa neigut
Christian Decker
Mark Beckwith