connect_control.c, dev_ping.c, gossip_control.c, invoice.c.
This converts about 50% of all calls of `json_get_params` to `param`.
After trying (and failing) to squash and rebase #1682 I just made a new branch
from a patch file and closed#1682.
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
I crashed the HSMD, and it gave no output at all. That's because we
were only reading the status fd when we were waiting for a reply.
Fix this by using a separate request fd and status fd, which also means
that hsm_sync_read() is no longer required.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
structeq() is too dangerous: if a structure has padding, it can fail
silently.
The new ccan/structeq instead provides a macro to define foo_eq(),
which does the right thing in case of padding (which none of our
structures currently have anyway).
Upgrade ccan, and use it everywhere. Except run-peer-wire.c, which
is only testing code and can use raw memcmp(): valgrind will tell us
if padding exists.
Interestingly, we still declared short_channel_id_eq, even though
we didn't define it any more!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
satoshis.place was slowing to a crawl, c-lightning was unresponsive.
Logs revealed charged doing many, many listinvoice <label> RPCs.
We were iterating the entire db every time: stop that!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Until now, `command_fail()` reported an error code of -1 for all uses.
This PR adds an `int code` parameter to `command_fail()`, requiring the
caller to explicitly include the error code.
This is part of #1464.
The majority of the calls are used during parameter validation and
their error code is now JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS.
The rest of the calls report an error code of LIGHTNINGD, which I defined to
-1 in `jsonrpc_errors.h`. The intention here is that as we improve our error
reporting, all occurenaces of LIGHTNINGD will go away and we can eventually
remove it.
I also converted calls to `command_fail_detailed()` that took a `NULL` `data`
parameter to use the new `command_fail()`.
The only difference from an end user perspecive is that bad input errors that
used to be -1 will now be -32602 (JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS).
We can have more than one; eg we might offer both bech32 and a p2sh
address, and in future we might offer v1 segwit, etc.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't handle \u, since we assume everyone sane is using UTF-8. We'd
still have to reject '\u0000' and maybe other weird cases if we did.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
* Modifies invoice command to have the following format
invoice <msatoshi> <label> <desc> <?expiry> <?fallbackaddr>
* Adds support for Segwit bcrt1 addresses for withdraw
* Add test case for fallback address in invoice creation
* Create a common json_tok_address_scriptpubkey to be used
by invoice and withdraw commands.
We always hand in "NULL" (which means use tal_len on the msg), except
for two places which do that manually for no good reason.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We move it into jsonrpc where it belongs, and make it fail the command.
This means it can tell us exactly what was wrong.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
delinvoice was orginally documented to only allow deletion of unpaid
invoices, but there might be reasons to delete paid ones or unexpired ones.
But we have to avoid the race where someone pays as it's deleted: the
easiest way is to have the caller tell us the status, and fail if
it's wrong.
Fixes: #477
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Error code is inverted (which makes sense: who returns 'true' on
error?), and anyway there's a leak if we do error.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This allows us to add other fields, such as version information,
warnings or invoiceless payments, later.
(Note: the deprecated listinvoice is unchanged)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This matches the other names, and also the return value is about to change.
This will be removed before release!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Paid invoices need to know how much was actually paid: both for the case
where no 'msatoshi' amount was specified, and for the normal case, where
clients are permitted to overpay in order to help them disguise their
payments.
While we migrate the db, we leave this field as 0 for old paid
invoices. This is unhelpful for accounting, but at least clearly
indicates what happened if we find this in the wild.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
'rhash' is the old terminology, but 'payment_preimage' and
'payment_hash' were decided on for the BOLTs, so we should fix that here.
We still use rhash internally, but that's much easier to fix.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Different commands (listinvoice, delinvoice, waitinvoice,
waitanyinvoice) returned different fields, as not all were updated.
This makes them uniform.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This reuses the same code internally, and also now means that we deal
correctly with "any" msatoshi invoices: the old code would a return
'msatoshi' of 0 in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The manfile and the online help use 'msatoshi', the returned
response uses 'msatoshi', nearly every invoice-related
monetary amount is labelled 'msatoshi' and not 'amount'.
Mark Beckwith
Rusty Russell
Felix
ZmnSCPxj
Igor Cota
John Barboza
alaniz
practicalswift