1. l1 update_fee -> l2
2. l1 commitment_signed -> l2 (using new feerate)
3. l1 <- revoke_and_ack l2
4. l1 <- commitment_signed l2 (using new feerate)
5. l1 -> revoke_and_ack l2
When we break the connection after #3, the reconnection causes #4 to
be retransmitted, but it turns out l1 wasn't telling the master to set
the local feerate until it received the commitment_signed, so on
reconnect it uses the old feerate, with predictable results (bad
signature).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Useful it we want to intercept bitcoin-cli first.
We move the getinfo() caching into start(), as that's when we can actually
use RPC.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to use it to override specific commands. It's non-valgrinded
already since we use '--trace-children-skip=*bitcoin-cli*' so the overhead
should be minimal.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It introduces imprecision (took 1 satoshi off results in the coming
tests), and we have a helper for this already.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was suggested via mail: the SHA256 sums should be extracted from the
sha256sums file we are checking against, which also allows us to switch bitcoind
version at build time.
Suggested-by: Giles Hall <@vishnubob>
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
We only did this when we were first creating a wallet, or when we
asked for a relative rescan, not in the normal case!
Fixes: #1843
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Lightning charge tests stopped working without a timeout, being unable
to find a route. The 15 second delay doesn't matter in real life, but
in these scenarios it does. This fixes it by making sure the channel
is usable immediately.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We got an index error, because status had only one field (onchaind not
started yet).
> wait_for(lambda: only_one(p.rpc.listpeers(l1.info['id'])['peers'][0]['channels'])['status'][1] == 'ONCHAIN:Tracking mutual close transaction')
E IndexError: list index out of range1
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Normal wallet txs get reconfirmed as blocks come in, but ones which need
closeinfo are more fragile, so we do it manually using txwatch for them.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to use the txwatch facility for UTXOs, where there's no channel,
so allow that the be NULL, and hand the struct lightningd which callers
want anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Note that we don't actually need the output number: it's the tx itself
which is confirmed. And the next caller doesn't have it convenient, so
eliminate it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These are not confirmed by the normal methods (wallet_can_spend is false!),
so we'll deal with them manually.
We use UTXO_FIELDS in wallet_add_utxo, too, for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In one case, the channel_update which we expected to activate the channel
from l2 was suppressed as redundant. This is certainly valid, so just
check the results.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was a very simple change and allowed us to remove the special
`json_opt_tok` macro.
Moved the callback out of `common/json.c` to `lightningd/json.c` because the new
callbacks are dependent on `struct command` etc.
(I already started on `json_tok_number`)
My plan is to:
1. upgrade json_tok_X one a time, maybe a PR for each one.
2. When done, rename macros (i.e, remove "_tal").
3. Remove all vestiges of the old callbacks
4. Add new callbacks so that we no longer need json_tok_tok!
(e.g., json_tok_label, json_tok_str, json_tok_msat)
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
Waiting for three node_announcments isn't always enough, since l2 can
publish two of them (an independent bug). Do the more Right Thing and
just wait for 30 seconds of no input...
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. connect convenience variable for improved readabilty.
2. a comment explaining that timer is on channel, not HTLC.
3. use modern python style in test_htlc_send_timeout
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now sending a ping makes sense: it should force the other end to send
a reply, unblocking the commitment process.
Note that rather than waiting for a reply, we're actually spinning on
a 100ms loop in this case. But it's simple and it works.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This doesn't do much (though we might get an error before we send the
commitment_signed), but it's infrastructure for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Mark Beckwith
conanoc
mikhaelsantos
Fabian Raetz
Simon Vrouwe
Douglas Schilling Landgraf
Cryptcoin Junkey