The fetchinvoice and offers plugins disable themselves if the option
isn't enabled (it's enabled by default on EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: `experimental-offers` enables fetch, payment and creation of (early draft) offers.
1. Hoist 7200 constant into the bolt12 heade2.
2. Make preimage the last createinvoice arg, so we could make it optional.
3. Check the validity of the preimage in createinvoice.
4. Always output used flag in listoffers.
5. Rename wallet offer iterators to offer_id iterators.
6. Fix paramter typos.
7. Rename `local_offer_id` parameter to `localofferid`.
8. Add reference constraints on local_offer_id db fields.
9. Remove cut/paste comment.
10. Clarify source of fatal() messages in wallet.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is for offers which have `send_invoice`: we need to associate the
payment with the original offer, in (the usual) case where it is a single
use offer. We mark it used when it's paid, to avoid a race.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Still asserts that it's the standard size, but makes it a dynamic
member. For simpliciy, changes the parse_onionpacket API (it must be
a tal object now, so we might as well allocate it here to catch all
the callers).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: delpay a new method to delete the payment completed or failed.
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
Changelog-Deprecated: JSON-RPC: `listsendpays` will no longer add `null` if we don't know the `amount_msat` for a payment.
While not directly necessary, it still feeds the `listpays` result, and so we
should pass it along if we can, so we don't have to rely solely on the
`amount_sent` field, which includes the fees.
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
There were no channel updates in my log; because sendonion doesn't know the
actual node_ids or channel_ids, we can't tell gossipd what node/channel it was
so it can no longer remove them on PERM errors.
However, we can tell it the error message so it can apply the update.
Fixes: #3877
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And document the partid arg.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `sendonion` has a new optional `bolt11` argument for when it's used to pay an invoice.
The test had part 1 and 2 backward, but still worked. When I copied that to
*after* the test had succeeded, it complained. It should always complain,
to catch bugs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This wasn't important before, but now we have MPP it's good to enforce.
Reported-by: Christian Decker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This happens to be an edge case with the way we use `sendonion` in
MPP. `sendonion` does not attempt to recover the route even if we supply the
shared secrets (it'd require us to map forwarding channels to the nodes etc),
so `failnode` will always be unset, unless it is the first hop, which gets
stored. This is not a problem if it weren't for the fact that we don't store
the partial route, consisting solely of the channel leading to the first hop,
therefore the assertion that either both are NULL or both aren't fails on the
first hop.
This went unnoticed since with MPP we have more concurrent payments in flight,
increasing the chances of a exhausted first hop considerably.
I noticed the following in logs for tests/test_connection.py::test_feerate_stress:
```
DEBUG 022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-chan#1: Failing HTLC 18446744073709551615 due to peer death
DEBUG 022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-chan#1: local_routing_failure: 8194 (WIRE_TEMPORARY_NODE_FAILURE)
```
This is because it reports the (transient) node_failure error, because
our channel_failure message is incomplete. Fix this wart up.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is what actually lets us pay blinded invoices.
Unfortunately, our internal logic assumes every hop in a path has a
next `short_channel_id`, so we have to use a dummy. This is
sufficient for testing, however.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Note that it's channeld which calculates the shared secret, too. This
minimizes the work that lightningd has to do, at cost of passing this
through.
We also don't yet save the blinding field(s) to the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's almost always "their_features" and "our_features" respectively, so
make those names clear.
Suggested-by: @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Turns out that unnecessary: all callers can access the feature_set,
so make it much more like a normal primitive.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of saving a stripped_update, we use the new
local_fail_in_htlc_needs_update.
One minor change: we return the more correct
towire_temporary_channel_failure when the node is still syncing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a common thing to do, so create a macro.
Unfortunately, it still needs the type arg, because the paramter may
be const, and the return cannot be, and C doesn't have a general
"(-const)" cast.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This cleans up the "local failure" callers for incoming HTLCs to hand
an onionreply instead of making us generate it from the code inside
make_failmsg.
(The db path still needs make_failmsg, so that's next).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-deprecated: Plugins: htlc_accepted_hook "failure_code" only handles simple cases now, use "failure_message".
At the moment, we store e.g. WIRE_TEMPORARY_CHANNEL_FAILURE, and then
lightningd has a large demux function which turns that into the correct
error message.
Such an enum demuxer is an anti-pattern.
Instead, store the message directly for output HTLCs; channeld now
sends us an error message rather than an error code.
For input HTLCs we will still need the failure code if the onion was
bad (since we need to prompt channeld to send a completely different
message than normal), though we can (and will!) eliminate its use in
non-BADONION failure cases.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Using it with a different value to the amount sent causes a crash in 0.8.0,
which is effectively deprecating it, so let's disallow it now.
Changelog-Changed: If the optional `msatoshi` param to sendpay for non-MPP is set, it must be the exact amount sent to the final recipient.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We tag them with specific versions when they're experimental,
but do a poor job of cleaning them up (and thus ensuring they're
checked!) afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Before this patch we used `int` for error codes. The problem with
`int` is that we try to pass it to/from wire and the size of `int` is
not defined by the standard. So a sender with 4-byte `int` would write
4 bytes to the wire and a receiver with 2-byte `int` (for example) would
read just 2 bytes from the wire.
To resolve this:
* Introduce an error code type with a known size:
`typedef s32 errcode_t`.
* Change all error code macros to constants of type `errcode_t`.
Constants also play better with gdb - it would visualize the name of
the constant instead of the numeric value.
* Change all functions that take error codes to take the new type
`errcode_t` instead of `int`.
* Introduce towire / fromwire functions to send / receive the newly added
type `errcode_t` and use it instead of `towire_int()`.
In addition:
* Remove the now unneeded `towire_int()`.
* Replace a hardcoded error code `-2` with a new constant
`INVOICE_EXPIRED_DURING_WAIT` (903).
Changelog-Changed: The waitinvoice command would now return error code 903 to designate that the invoice expired during wait, instead of the previous -2
1. We asserted that there wouldn't be a raw failcode.
2. We didn't pass the failure information via JSON in this case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes it clear we're dealing with a message which is a wrapped error
reply (needing unwrap_onionreply), not an already-wrapped one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
`wallet_payment_store` would free the `wallet_payment` instance which would
then cause us to reload it from the DB. Instead of doing the store->free->load
dance we now tell `wallet_payment_store` whether it should take ownership and
leave it alone if not.
Passing the payment around instead of referencing it through payment_hash and
partid is a nice side-effect.
`wallet_payment_store` frees the unstored payment after it has stored it, but
we still need that instance for our notifications. This is the smallest
possible fix, but I plan to refactor this out.
Changelog-Changed: plugin: `notify_sendpay_success` and `notify_sendpay_failure` are now always called, even if there is no command waiting on the result.
Thanks to @t-bast, who made this possible by interop testing with Eclair!
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive TLV-style onion messages.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive BOLT11 payment_secrets.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now receive basic multi-part payments.
Changelog-Added: RPC: low-level commands sendpay and waitsendpay can now be used to manually send multi-part payments.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Bastien TEINTURIER <bastien@acinq.fr> writes:
> One thing I noticed but didn't investigate much: after sending the two
> payments, I tried using `waitsendpay` and it reported an error *208*
> (*"Never attempted payment for
> '98ee736d29d860948e436546a88b0cc84f267de8818531b0fdbe6ce3d080f22a'"*).
>
> I was expecting the result to be something like: "payment succeeded for
> that payment hash" (the HTLCs were correctly settled).
Indeed, if you waitsendpay without specifying a partid, you are waiting
for 0, which may not exist. Clarify the error msg.
Reported-by: @t-bast
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Bastien TEINTURIER <bastien@acinq.fr> writes:
> It looks like the split on c-lightning side is quite limited at the moment:
> the only option is to split a payment in exactly its two halves,
> otherwise I get rejected because of the rule of overpaying more than
> twice the amount?
We only tested exactly two equal-size payments; indeed, our finalhop
test was backwards. We only complain if the final hop pays more than
twice msat (technically, this test is still too loose for mpp: the
spec says we should sum to the exact amount).
Reported-by: @t-bast
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
fiatjaf
Vincenzo Palazzo
Christian Decker
Vasil Dimov