Currently it's fairly ad-hoc, but we need to tell it to channeld when
it restarts, so we define it as the non-HTLC balance.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It needs to save them to the db in case of restart; this means we tell
it about funding_locked, as well as the next_per_commit_point given
in revoke_and_ack.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use this to make it send the funding_signed message, rather than having
the master daemon do it (which was even more hacky). It also means it
can handle the crypto, so no need for the packet to be handed up encrypted,
and also make --dev-disconnect "just work" for this packet.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead, send it the funding_signed message; it can watch, save to
database, and send it.
Now the openingd fundee path is a simple request and response, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Like the fd, it's only useful when the peer is not in a daemon, so we
free & NULL it when that happens.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. We explicitly assert what state we're coming from, to make transitions
clearer.
2. Every transition has a state, even between owners while waiting for HSM.
3. Explictly step though getting the HSM signature on the funding tx
before starting channeld, rather than doing it in parallel: makes
states clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently create a peer struct, then complete handshake to find out
who it is. This means we have a half-formed peer, and worse: if it's
a reconnect we get two peers the same.
Add an explicit 'struct connection' for the handshake phase, and
construct a 'struct peer' once that's done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Only the side *accepting* the connection gives a `minumum_depth`, but both
sides are supposed to wait that long:
BOLT #2:
### The `funding_locked` message
...
#### Requirements
The sender MUST wait until the funding transaction has reached
`minimum-depth` before sending this message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is an approximate result (it's only our confirmed balance, not showing
outstanding HTLCs), but it gives an easy way to check HTLCs have been
resolved.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's a bit messy, since some status messages are accompanied by an FD:
in this case, the handler returns STATUS_NEED_FD and we read that then
re-call the handler.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker