This also means we subtract 660 satoshis more everywhere we subtract
the base fee (except for mutual close, where the base fee is still
used).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
HTLC fees increase (larger weight), and the fee paid by the opener
has to include the anchor outputs (i.e. 660 sats).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Update the `bitcoin_tx_add_input` interface to accept a witness script
and or scriptPubkey.
We save the amount + witness script + witness program (if known) to
the PSBT object for a transaction when creating an input.
Since we now over-write the wally malloc/free functions, we need to do
so for tests as well. Here we pull up all of the common setup/teardown
logic into a separate place, and update the tests that use libwally to
use the new common_setup core
Changelog-None
Previously we've used the term 'funder' to refer to the peer
paying the fees for a transaction; v2 of openchannel will make
this no longer true. Instead we rename this to 'opener', or the
peer sending the 'open_channel' message, since this will be universally
true in a dual-funding world.
This is ignored in subdaemons which are per-peer, but very useful for
multi-peer daemons like connectd and gossipd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The way we build transactions, serialize them, and compute fees depends on the
chain we are working on, so let's add some context to the transactions.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
They're generally used pass-by-copy (unusual for C structs, but
convenient they're basically u64) and all possibly problematic
operations return WARN_UNUSED_RESULT bool to make you handle the
over/underflow cases.
The new #include in json.h means we bolt11.c sees the amount.h definition
of MSAT_PER_BTC, so delete its local version.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is mainly just copying over the copy-editing from the
lightning-rfc repository.
[ Split to just perform changes prior to the UNKNOWN_PAYMENT_HASH change --RR ]
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
This is prep work for when we sign htlc txs with
SIGHASH_SINGLE|SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY.
We still deal with raw signatures for the htlc txs at the moment, since
we send them like that across the wire, and changing that was simply too
painful (for the moment?).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
tal_count() is used where there's a type, even if it's char or u8, and
tal_bytelen() is going to replace tal_len() for clarity: it's only needed
where a pointer is void.
We shim tal_bytelen() for now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Really, we should have a 'struct point' since we don't use all points
as pubkeys. But this is the minimal fix to avoid type cast nastiness.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is probably covered by our "channel capacity" heuristic which
requires the channel be significant, but best to be explicit and sure.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's just a sha256_double, but importantly when we convert it to a
string (in type_to_string, which is used in logging) we use
bitcoin_txid_to_hex() so it's reversed as people expect.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All the callers need to pass it in: currently channeld and openingd just
fake it by copying the payment point.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We alternated between using a sha256 and using a privkey, but there are
numerous places where we have a random 32 bytes which are neither.
This fixes many of them (plus, struct privkey is now defined in terms of
struct secret).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we correctly use the remote revocation basepoint, we need to set
it in run-channel (instead of the local revocation basepoint).
We also update all the comments, as per (pending) spec commit:
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/137
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was included in the lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc#105 update
to the test vectors, and it's a good idea. Takes a bit of work to
calculate (particularly, being aware of rounding issues).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
niftynei
Christian Decker
practicalswift