If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Copied the JSON-request parsing from `pay.c`, passing through to
`gossipd`, filling the reply with the `route_hop` serialization, and
serializing as JSON-RPC response.
The gossip subdaemon previously passed the fd after init: this is
unnecessary for peers which simply want to gossip (and not establish
channels).
Now we hand the gossip fd back with the peer fd. This adds another
error message for when we fail to create the gossip fds.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We should check that the peer it says it's returning is under its control,
we need to take back the peer fd, and use the correct conversion routine
for the packet it sends us.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Raw crypto_state is what we send across the wire: the peer one is for
use in async crypto io routines (peer_read_message/peer_write_message).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's awkward to handle them differently. But this change means we
need to expose them to the generated code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we hand peers off to the gossip daemon, to do the INIT handshake and
re-transmit/receive gossip. They may stay there forever if neither we nor
them wants to open a channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker