BackgroundL Each log has a log_book: many logs can share the same one,
as each one can have a separate prefix.
Testing tickled a bug at the end of this series, where subd was
logging to the peer's log_book on shutdown, but the peer was already
freed. We've already had issues with logging while lightningd is
shutting down.
There are times when reference counting really is the right answer,
this seems to be one of them: the 'struct log' share the 'struct
log_book' and the last 'struct log' cleans it up.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We derive the seed from this, so it needs to be unique, but using
rowid forced us to put the channel into the db early, before it
was ready.
Instead, use a counter to ensure uniqueness, initialized when we load
existing peers. This doesn't need to touch the database at all.
As we now have only two places where the channel is committed (the
funder and fundee paths), so we create a new explicit
'wallet_channel_insert()' function: 'wallet_channel_save()' now just
updates.
Note that this also fixes some weirdness in
wallet_channels_load_active: we strangely avoided loading channels in
CLOSINGD_COMPLETE (which fortunately was a transient state, so
unlikely anyone hit this). Note that since the lines above already
delete all the OPENINGD channels, we now simply load them all.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Adds a simple check that compares genesis-blockhashes from the
chainparams against the blockhash that the wallet was created
with. The wallet is network specific, so mixing is always a bad idea.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We now keep a list of commands for the jcon instead of a simple
'current' pointer: the assertions become a bit more complex, but
the rest is fairly mechanical.
Fixes: #1007
Reported-by: @ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We do a complicated dance because we don't know the current block
height before setting up the topology.
If we're starting at a particular block, we want to go back 100 blocks
before that to cover any reorgs.
If we're not (fresh startup), we still want to go back 100 blocks
because we don't bother handling a reorg which removes all the blocks
we know.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With fallback depending on chainparams: this means the first upgrade
will be slow, but after that it'll be fast.
Fixes: #990
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We error out for all kinds of reasons early on (eg. bitcoind down),
and printing a backtrace for them is pretty confusing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Includes closing off stdout and stderr. We don't do it directly in the
arg parser, as we want to interact normally (eg with other errors) before
we turn off stdout/stderr.
Fixes: #986
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This interacts badly with --daemon (next patch) which then tries to
reap a child it didn't create, which took me a couple of hours to
figure out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Once we read a command, we are supposed to io_wait until it finishes.
However, we are actually woken in two places: when it's complete
(which is correct), and when it's written out (which is wrong).
We don't care when it's written out, only when it's finished:
refactor to make json_done() free and NULL the old ->current,
rather than have the callers do it. Now it's clear that it's
ready for both new output and new input.
Fixes: #934
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We will have probably failed the others, but either way, don't try to
fulfill an HTLC we've already failed.
Fixes: #394
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We usually did this, but sometimes they were named after what they did,
rather than what they cleaned up.
There are still a few exceptions:
1. I didn't bother creating destroy_xxx wrappers for htable routines
which already existed.
2. Sometimes destructors really are used for side-effects (eg. to simply
mark that something was freed): these are clearer with boutique names.
3. Generally destructors are static, but they don't need to be: in some
cases we attach a destructor then remove it later, or only attach
to *some* cases. These are best with qualifiers in the destroy_<type>
name.
Suggested-by: @ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This provides a sanity check that we are in sync, and also keeps the
logic in the program and out of the SQL.
Since the destructor now doesn't clean up the peer, there are some
wider changes to be made when cleaning up. Most notably we create
lots of channels in run-wallet.c and they previously freed the peer:
now we need free the peer explicitly, so we need to free them first.
Suggested-by: @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And return the correct error message for the channel they give, if
they try to re-establish on an error channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Channels are within the peer structure, but the peer is freed only
when the last channel is freed.
We also implement channel_set_owner() and make peer_set_owner() a temporary
wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Much like the database; peer contains id, address, channel contains
per-channel information. Where we create a channel, we always create
the peer too.
For the moment, peer->log and channel->log coexist side-by-side, to
reduce some of the churn.
Note that this changes the API to dev-forget-channel: if we have more
than one channel, we insist they specify the short-channel-id.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is not connected yet; during the transition, there will be a 1:1
mapping from channel to peer, so we can use channel2peer and peer2channel
to shim between them.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Both when we forget about an opening peer, and at startup. We're
going to be relying on this, and the next patch, as we refactor
peer/channel handling to mirror the db.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Combining the two was just awkward, so it's clearer to have separate
functions. And we make the lower-level functions do the escaping.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The JSON-RPC spec specifies that if the request is unparseable we
should return an error with a NULL id. This is a bit more friendly
than slamming the door in the face.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
As reported by @practicalswift in #945 it is possible to inject
non-printable, or shell escape, characters in a json command, that
will fail to parse and then clear the shell.
Reported-by: @practicalswift
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>