Unlike other daemons, closingd doesn't listen to the master, but runs
simply to its own beat. So instead of responding to the JSON dev_memleak
command, we always check for memory leaks, and make sure that the
python tests fail if they see MEMLEAK in the logs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This avoids some very ugly switch() statements which mixed the two,
but we also take the chance to rename 'towire_gossip_' to
'towire_gossipd_' for those inter-daemon messages; they're messages to
gossipd, not gossip messages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The spec says so, and it's right: with the right pattern of packet loss
(thanks Travis!) the other end can still be in channeld, waiting for our
`shutdown` message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
That matches the other CSV names (HSM was the first, so it was written
before the pattern emerged).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
@renepickhardt: why is it actually lightningd.c with a d but hsm.c without d ?
And delete unused gossipd/gossip.h.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Also means we simplify the handle_gossip_msg() since everyone wants it to
use sync_crypto_write().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is more verbose but I still think it's clearer. Almost exactly
the same as the openingd one, but just different enough to be painful
to share.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
structeq() is too dangerous: if a structure has padding, it can fail
silently.
The new ccan/structeq instead provides a macro to define foo_eq(),
which does the right thing in case of padding (which none of our
structures currently have anyway).
Upgrade ccan, and use it everywhere. Except run-peer-wire.c, which
is only testing code and can use raw memcmp(): valgrind will tell us
if padding exists.
Interestingly, we still declared short_channel_id_eq, even though
we didn't define it any more!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a rebased and combined patch for Tor support. It is extensively
reworked in the following patches, but the basis remains Saibato's work,
so it seemed fairest to begin with this.
Minor changes:
1. Use --announce-addr instead of --tor-external.
2. I also reverted some whitespace and unrelated changes from the patch.
3. Removed unnecessary ';' after } in functions.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means that openingd and closingd now forward our gossip. But the real
reason we want to do this is that it gives an easy way for gossipd to kill
any active daemon, by closing its fd: previously closingd and openingd didn't
read the fd, so tended not to notice.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
(This was sitting in my gossip-enchancement patch queue, but it simplifies
this set too, so I moved it here).
In 94711969f we added an explicit gossip_index so when gossipd gets
peers back from other daemons, it knows what gossip it has sent (since
gossipd can send gossip after the other daemon is already complete).
This solution is insufficient for the more general case where gossipd
wants to send other messages reliably, so replace it with the other
solution: have gossipd drain the "gossip fd" which the daemon returns.
This turns out to be quite simple, and is probably how I should have
done it originally :(
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
d822ba1ee accidentally removed this case, which is important: if the
other side didn't get our final matching closing_signed, it will
reconnect and try again. We consider the channel no longer "active"
and thus ignore it, and get upset when it send the
`channel_reestablish` message.
We could just consider CLOSINGD_COMPLETE to be active, but then we'd
have to wait for the closing transaction to be mined before we'd allow
another connection.
We can't special case it when the peer reconnects, because there
could be (in theory) multiple channels for that peer in CLOSINGD_COMPLETE,
and we don't know which one to reestablish.
So, we need to catch this when they send the reestablish, and hand
that msg to closingd to do negotiation again. We already have code
to note that we're in CLOSINGD_COMPLETE and thus ignore any result
it gives us.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For older clients we could do more exhaustive checks, but effort is better
spent on removing this altogether post 0.6 as clients upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
@ZmnSCPxj points out that this is allowed, though invalid:
1. commitment_fee = 1000
2. funder: 800
3. fundee: 200
4. funder: 900
We need to adjust the feerange using the initial funder offer.
In particular, the main daemon and subdaemons share the backtrace code,
with hooks for logging.
The daemon hook inserts the io_poll override, which means we no longer
need io_debug.[ch]. Though most daemons don't need it, they still link
against ccan/io, so it's harmess (suggested by @ZmnSCPxj).
This was tested manually to make sure we get backtraces still.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we're going to simply take() a pointer, don't allocate it off a random
object. Using NULL makes our intent clear, particularly with allocating
packets we're going to take() onto a queue.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This one is a bit more subtle than others: we can't just free it
inside the read_peer_msg() loop since we hand tmpctx in, so open-code
the two callers and it's clearer.
They're inside the only loops closingd has.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I did a brief audit of tmpctx uses, and we do leak them in various
corner cases. Fortunely, all our daemons are based on some kind of
I/O loop, so it's fairly easy to clean a global tmpctx at that point.
This makes things a bit neater, and slightly more efficient, but also
clearer: I avoided creating a tmpctx in a few places because I didn't
want to add another allocation. With that penalty removed, I can use
it more freely and hopefully write clearer code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use the permanent slot to indicate our overall negotiation range,
and the transient slot to say what we're waiting for.
On success, we update the permanent slot to indicate the final value.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We always hand in "NULL" (which means use tal_len on the msg), except
for two places which do that manually for no good reason.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Because peer_failed would previously drop the connection, we had a
special 'negotiation_failed' message which made the master hand it
back to gossipd. We don't need that any more.
This also meant we no longer need a special hook in read_peer_msg
for openingd to send this message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Several daemons (onchaind, hsm) want to use the status messages, but
don't communicate with peers. The coming changes made them drag in
more code they didn't need, so instead we have a different
non-overlapping type.
We combine the status_received_errmsg and status_sent_errmsg
into a single status_peer_error, with the presence or not of the
'error_for_them' field indicating direction.
We also rename status_fatal_connection_lost() to
peer_failed_connection_lost() to fit in.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We make it a macro, since everyone uses PEER_FD and GOSSIP_FD constants
(they're actually always the same, but this is slightly safer), and
add a gossip_index arg: this is groundwork for when we want to hand
the peer back to master for gossipd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we have wirestring, this is much more natural. And with the
24M length limit, we needn't be so concerned about dumping 64k peer
messages in hex.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a transitional patch so we can still close channels cleanly;
for want of a better option, I hooked it into --deprecated-apis.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This follows the proposal to make the funder send the first offer.
The dual loops are because there's initially very little restriction
on the amounts, then once they're first established they tighten as
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We shouldn't fail negotiation just because they exceeded what we thought
fair: we're better off as long as it's actually <= final commitment fee.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular, handle pings. The rest is modelled on the channeld one,
but annoyingly different enough that it's hard to share code without
significant work.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
practicalswift
Saibato
ZmnSCPxj