This seems to happen when we manage to check between the
channel_announcement and the channel_update being processed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Add two simple tests: one for a single direct payment and one with
hundreds of parallel payments, reusing the same route.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We only send them when we're not awaiting revoke_and_ack: our
simplified handling can't deal with multiple in flights.
Closes: #244
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can have it happen on reconnect due to fee changes; we should really
detect this case, but it's harmless to let it happen as a noop.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Handling feerates for the fundee (who only receives fee_update) is
simple: it's practically atomic since we accept commitment and send
revocation, thus they're applied to both sides at once.
Handling feerates for the funder is more complex: in theory we could
have multiple in flight. However, if we avoid this using the same
logic as we use to suppress multiple commitments in flight, it's
simple again.
We fix the test code to use real feerate manipulation, thus have to
remove an assert about feerate being non-zero. And now we have
feechanges, we need to rely on the changes_pending flags, as we can
have changes without an HTLCs changing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Depending on what we're doing, we can want different ones. So use
IMMEDIATE (estimatesmartfee 2 CONSERVATIVE), NORMAL (estimatesmartfee
4 ECONOMICAL) and SLOW (estimatesmartfee 100 ECONOMICAL).
If one isn't available, we try making each one half the previous.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we convert it when retrieving from bitcoind; internally it's
always satoshi-per-1000-weight aka millisatoshi-per-weight.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Test objects must be added to $(ALL_OBJS) so they correctly depend on
CCAN headers etc.
Also, each test in a subdir must depend on headers and src in the parent
directory, as it will often #include them directly.
Reported-by: Christian Decker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Our testsuite uses --dev-fail-on-subdaemon-fail, so I didn't notice this
until I turned that off to chase a bug.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently scan through HTLCs: this isn't enough if we've only got a
feechange in the commitment, so use a flag (but keep both for now for
debugging).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Used by the JSON-RPC for the listtransfers call. Currently does not
support any form of paging.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
There were two bugs here. First, grind_feerate() needs to check the
actual range of feerates, not the same rate over and over! Secondly,
we need to grind the feerate for the HTLC-success tx, too.
These were masked by the fact that our tests always use the same feerate!
"Untested code is buggy code"
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we'll find anywhere still using the payment key,
even though we still expose the private payment key to channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
ueno
Rusty Russell
Damian Mee