I didn't convert all tests: they can still use a standalone context.
It's just marginally more efficient to share the libwally one for all
our daemons which link against it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This avoids clashing with the new_channel we're about to add to lightningd,
and also matches its counterpart new_initial_channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's just a sha256_double, but importantly when we convert it to a
string (in type_to_string, which is used in logging) we use
bitcoin_txid_to_hex() so it's reversed as people expect.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Handling feerates for the fundee (who only receives fee_update) is
simple: it's practically atomic since we accept commitment and send
revocation, thus they're applied to both sides at once.
Handling feerates for the funder is more complex: in theory we could
have multiple in flight. However, if we avoid this using the same
logic as we use to suppress multiple commitments in flight, it's
simple again.
We fix the test code to use real feerate manipulation, thus have to
remove an assert about feerate being non-zero. And now we have
feechanges, we need to rely on the changes_pending flags, as we can
have changes without an HTLCs changing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Means caller has to do some more work, but this is closer to what we want:
we're going to want to send them to the master daemon for atomic commit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Mainly switching from the old include to the new include and adjusting
the actual size of the onion packet. It also moves `channel.c` to use
`struct hop_data`.
It introduces a dummy next hop in `channel.c` that will be replaced in
the next commit.
We call channel_sent_commit *before* sending (so we know if we need
to), so the name is wrong. Similarly channel_sent_revoke_and_ack.
We can usefully have them tell is if there is outstanding work to do,
too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Passing through 'struct peer *' was a layering violation.
Reported-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The three cases we care about only happen on specific transitions:
1. They can no longer spend our failed HTLC: we can fail the source now.
2. They are fully committed to their new HTLC htlc: we can forward now.
3. They can no longer timeout their fulfilled HTLC: the funds are ours.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we correctly use the remote revocation basepoint, we need to set
it in run-channel (instead of the local revocation basepoint).
We also update all the comments, as per (pending) spec commit:
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/137
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All the daemons will use a common seed for point derivation, so drag
it out of lightningd/opening.
This also provide a nice struct wrapper to reduce argument count.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Only minor changes, but I add some more spec text to
lightningd/test/run-commit_tx.c to be sure to catch if it changes
again.
One reference isn't upstream yet, so had to be commented out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This object is basically the embodyment of BOLT #2. Each HTLC already
knows its own state; this moves them between states and keeps them
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
practicalswift
Christian Decker