If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We call channel_sent_commit *before* sending (so we know if we need
to), so the name is wrong. Similarly channel_sent_revoke_and_ack.
We can usefully have them tell is if there is outstanding work to do,
too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Passing through 'struct peer *' was a layering violation.
Reported-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The three cases we care about only happen on specific transitions:
1. They can no longer spend our failed HTLC: we can fail the source now.
2. They are fully committed to their new HTLC htlc: we can forward now.
3. They can no longer timeout their fulfilled HTLC: the funds are ours.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The direction bit was computed in several spots and was inconsistent
in some cases. Now we compute it just in routing, and once when
starting up `channeld`, this avoids recomputing it all over the place.
Now we correctly use the remote revocation basepoint, we need to set
it in run-channel (instead of the local revocation basepoint).
We also update all the comments, as per (pending) spec commit:
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/137
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Before exiting, `channeld` constructs and sends a `channel_update`
marking the channel as disabled. This is the pro-active signalling
that the channel may no longer be used.
Copied the JSON-request parsing from `pay.c`, passing through to
`gossipd`, filling the reply with the `route_hop` serialization, and
serializing as JSON-RPC response.
The `route_hop` struct introduced in the previous refactoring is
reused when returning the reply to a `getroute` request. Since these
are nested messages I added the serialization and deserialization
methods.
This came up while debugging the gossip daemon breaking upon calling
`getroute`. It turns out that log was still writing to stdout, but
stdout had been reused for an inter-daemon socket, which would
break...
The STDOUT fd being reused as communication sockets with other daemons
was causing some unexpected crashes if the sub-daemon wrote something,
e.g., using `log_*`. Not closing it should avoid that conflict.
Some of the struct array helpers need to allocate data when
deserializing their fields. The `getnodes` reply is one such example
that allocates the hostname. Since the change to calling array helpers
the getnodes call was broken because it was attempting to allocate off
of the entry, which did not have a tal header, thus failing.
Use msg_enqueue's wake and msg_queue_wait, and don't clone packets since
msg_enqueue() respects take.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We remove the unused status_send_fd, and rename status_send_sync (it
should only be used for that case now).
We add a status_setup_async(), and wire things internally to use that
if it's set up: status_setup() is renamed status_setup_sync().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a little more awkward, as we used to do some work
synchronously (the init message), but it's still pretty clear.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we use async IO, we can't use status_send. We keep a pointer to the
master daemon_conn, and use that to send.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The gossip subdaemon previously passed the fd after init: this is
unnecessary for peers which simply want to gossip (and not establish
channels).
Now we hand the gossip fd back with the peer fd. This adds another
error message for when we fail to create the gossip fds.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>