It turns out we were heavily relying on the fact that after each message from
the client there'd be a flush, and that there would not be anything after the
JSON object we read. This will no longer be the case once we start streaming
things or we are very quick in issuing the JSON-RPC requests.
This just takes one of the error paths (incomplete read) and makes it into a
successful path if we have indeed read a full root element.
This was a very simple change and allowed us to remove the special
`json_opt_tok` macro.
Moved the callback out of `common/json.c` to `lightningd/json.c` because the new
callbacks are dependent on `struct command` etc.
(I already started on `json_tok_number`)
My plan is to:
1. upgrade json_tok_X one a time, maybe a PR for each one.
2. When done, rename macros (i.e, remove "_tal").
3. Remove all vestiges of the old callbacks
4. Add new callbacks so that we no longer need json_tok_tok!
(e.g., json_tok_label, json_tok_str, json_tok_msat)
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
tal_count() is used where there's a type, even if it's char or u8, and
tal_bytelen() is going to replace tal_len() for clarity: it's only needed
where a pointer is void.
We shim tal_bytelen() for now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Removed `json_get_params`.
Also added json_tok_percent and json_tok_newaddr. Probably should
have been a separate PR but it was so easy.
[ Squashed comment update for gcc workaround --RR ]
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
This is part of #1464 and incorporates Rusty's suggested updates from #1569.
See comment in param.h for description, here's the basics:
unsigned cltv;
const jsmntok_t *note;
u64 msatoshi;
struct param * mp;
if (!param_parse(cmd, buffer, tokens,
param_req("cltv", json_tok_number, &cltv),
param_opt("note", json_tok_tok, ¬e),
mp = param_opt("msatoshi", json_tok_u64, &msatoshi),
NULL))
return;
if (param_is_set(mp))
do_something()
There is a lot of developer mode code to make sure we don't make mistakes,
like trying to unmarshal into the same variable twice or adding a required param
after optional.
During testing, I found a bug (of sorts) in the current system. It allows you
to provide two named parameters with the same name without error; e.g.:
# cli/lightning-cli -k newaddr addresstype=p2sh-segwit addresstype=bech32
{
"address": "2N3r6fT65PhfhE1mcMS6TtcdaEurud6M7pA"
}
It just takes the first and ignores the second. The new system reports this as an
error for now. We can always change this later.
Just a small cleanup of the indentation code, so we don't have to reformat all
the issue reports to become readable. This is much closer to what `jq` or
`json_pp` spit out and doesn't have those infinitely long lines.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We move it into jsonrpc where it belongs, and make it fail the command.
This means it can tell us exactly what was wrong.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This change could break users who accidentally have typos in scripts,
so we need to check sooner rather than later.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
ie. non-printable, quotes or escapes. We allow these outside tokens
(we expect tabs and \n for example).
This is a big hammer, but if someone really wants we can add support
later.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Don't try to escape them. It's whack-a-mole and they shouldn't do it anyway.
Suggested-by: Christian Decker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They don't currently, since callers check, but be safe. In addition,
handle NULL returns from these in the bitcoind code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Also, we split the more sophisticated json_add helpers to avoid pulling in
everything into lightning-cli, and unify the routines to print struct
short_channel_id (it's ':', not '/' too).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The new onion uses the `channel_id` instead of the `node_id` of the
next hop to identify where to forward the payment. So we return the
exact channel chosen by the routing algo, to avoid having to look it
up again later.
We need some way to reflect the tradeoff between the possible delay if
a payment gets stuck, and the fees charged by nodes. This adds a risk
factor which reflects the probability that a node goes down, and the
cost associated with losing access to our funds for a given time.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is less convenient to use, but makes far more sense for a real
user (like a wallet). It can ask about the route, then decide whether
to use it or not.
This will make even more sense once we add a parameter to control how
long we let the HTLC be delayed for, so a client can query for high,
medium and low tolerances and compare results.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
Mark Beckwith
Mark Beckwith
Rusty Russell
practicalswift
ZmnSCPxj
Björge Dijkstra
Andrew Chow