Also, we split the more sophisticated json_add helpers to avoid pulling in
everything into lightning-cli, and unify the routines to print struct
short_channel_id (it's ':', not '/' too).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To avoid everything pulling in HTLCs stuff to the opening daemon, we
split the channel and commit_tx routines into initial_channel and
initial_commit_tx (no HTLC support) and move full HTLC supporting versions
into channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As per lightning-rfc change 956e8809d9d1ee87e31b855923579b96943d5e63
"BOLT 7: add chain_hashes values to channel_update and channel_announcment"
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This brings us up to 955e874acc535ab2c74c1cf0eab61896ea4224ff in
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc
This doesn't actually change anything; the only actual change is held back
for the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to check if we exit after sending a revoke_and_ack, otherwise
channeld ends up getting the closing_signed packet.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was causing failures on testnet where confirmations are not
immediate.
Reported-by: Fabrice Drouin @sstone
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
As tracked down by Christian; by setting up the master conn first,
we make the master fd async. This means that the synchronous read
(in init_channel) can fail with -EAGAIN, and indeed, Christian
saw this when not running under valgrind.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is what it actually is, and makes it clearer when we refer to the
spec. It's the commitment we're currently updating, which is the next
commitment.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently have the problem that the master can send new HTLCs before
we've processed the incoming reestablish message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The next patch includes wire/peer_wire.h and causes a compile error
as lightningd/gossip_control.c defined its own gossip_msg function.
New names are clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We keep the scriptpubkey to send until after a commitment_signed (or,
in the corner case, if there's no pending commitment). When we
receive a shutdown from the peer, we pass it up to the master.
It's up to the master not to add any more HTLCs, which works because
we move from CHANNELD_NORMAL to CHANNELD_SHUTTING_DOWN.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When we get a fail/fulfill on an outgoing HTLC, we tell the correspoding
incoming HTLC about it. But if that peer is disconnected, we don't.
The better solution is to copy the preimage/malformed/failmessage and mark
the incoming HTLC as resolved. This is done most simply by marking it
SENT_REMOVE_HTLC, which will work in the database case as well.
channeld now re-transmits appropriately when it gets started with an HTLC
in that state.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This matches what the master does: increments commit index when we send
commit_sig. Thus if we restart at that point, we match.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need the old remote per_commitment_point so we can validate the
per_commitment_secret when we get it.
We unify this housekeeping in the master daemon using
update_per_commit_point().
This patch also saves whether remote funding is locked, and disallows
doing that twice (channeld should ignore it).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are two ways we can do retransmission on reconnect: re-derive
what we would have sent, or remember it and simply re-send. The
rederivation is difficult: unwinding state depends on whether we sent
a revoke_and_ack before or after the commitment_signed, and unwinding
a revoke_and_ack would require us to remember HTLCs we would have
normally forgotten at this point.
So we simply tell the master to remember the old signatures for us,
and hand them back in case we need to re-send.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the case where we can't decrypt the onion, we can't fail it in the
normal way (which is encrypted using the onion shared secret), we need
to respond with a update_fail_malformed_htlc message.
Moreover, we need to remember this for persistence. This means that
we really have three conclusions for an HTLC: fulfilled, failed,
malformed. Fix up the logic everywhere which assumed failed or
fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's easiest to have the master keep the last commit we sent, for
re-transmission. We could recalculate it, but it's made more difficult
by the before/after revoke case.
And because revoke_and_ack changes the channel state, we need to
remember which order we sent them in for re-transmission.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It needs to save them to the db in case of restart; this means we tell
it about funding_locked, as well as the next_per_commit_point given
in revoke_and_ack.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The channel daemon gets the shared secrets from the HSM to save
the master daemon some work. It used to hand these over at
revoke_and_ack receive, which is when the master daemon needs them.
However, it's a bit simpler to hand them over when we first tell
the master about the incoming HTLC (the first commitsig).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When adding their HTLCs, it needs all the information. When failing,
it needs the id as key and the failure reason. When fulfilling, it
needs the id and payment preimage.
It also needs to know when we have received an revoke_and_ack or a
commitment_signed, to place in the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to change to a batch interface, where we tell the master
before we send certain packets (eg. commit, revoke). We need to wait
for it to respond before doing anything else, but it might cross-over
and be sending us commands at the same time.
This queues those requests until we're ready.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This prepares us for handlers turning off peer I/O, rather than assuming
we always want to handle the next incoming message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We still get the shared secret, since that requires a round trip to the HSM
(why waste the master daemon's time?) but it does the processing, which
simplifies the message passing and things like realm handling which
have nothing to do with this particular channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Means caller has to do some more work, but this is closer to what we want:
we're going to want to send them to the master daemon for atomic commit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker