Unfortuntely we get spurious uninitialized variable warnings with
anything but -O3 or no optimization, so set default CWARNFLAGS
appropriately.
MCP bench results without optimization:
store_load_msec:28509-31001(29206.6+/-9.4e+02)
vsz_kb:580004-580016(580006+/-4.8)
store_rewrite_sec:11.640000-12.730000(11.908+/-0.41)
listnodes_sec:1.790000-1.880000(1.83+/-0.032)
listchannels_sec:21.180000-21.950000(21.476+/-0.27)
routing_sec:2.210000-11.160000(7.126+/-3.1)
peer_write_all_sec:36.270000-41.200000(38.168+/-1.9)
MCP bench with -Og: 22% speedup vs no optimization
store_load_msec:21963-23645(22841+/-6.6e+02)
vsz_kb:579916
store_rewrite_sec:10.080000-10.960000(10.456+/-0.3)
listnodes_sec:1.280000-1.390000(1.338+/-0.047)
listchannels_sec:14.770000-16.080000(15.518+/-0.46)
routing_sec:0.990000-6.660000(3.958+/-2.2)
peer_write_all_sec:29.950000-32.950000(31.138+/-1)
MCP bench with -O2: 31% speedup vs no optimization
store_load_msec:20713-22088(21505.6+/-4.8e+02)
vsz_kb:579928
store_rewrite_sec:9.570000-11.200000(10.192+/-0.54)
listnodes_sec:0.960000-1.090000(1.028+/-0.045)
listchannels_sec:10.400000-11.770000(11.012+/-0.48)
routing_sec:0.300000-3.140000(1.978+/-1.1)
peer_write_all_sec:28.980000-30.310000(29.572+/-0.44)
MCP bench with -O3 -flto: 36% speedup vs no optimization
store_load_msec:19616-20191(19862.6+/-1.9e+02)
vsz_kb:578452
store_rewrite_sec:8.980000-9.960000(9.55+/-0.32)
listnodes_sec:0.920000-1.910000(1.18+/-0.38)
listchannels_sec:8.960000-9.450000(9.206+/-0.16)
routing_sec:0.730000-1.850000(1.438+/-0.42)
peer_write_all_sec:28.090000-29.410000(28.772+/-0.42)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without this, the connect command hangs in one of my branches. This logic
is from the old days when gossipd handled connections, and we wanted
to make sure it didn't hang up on this client due to the error.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
68fe5eacde introduced a skip in the iteration
of the available funds, which means utxos[i] may be off the end of utxos.
Reported-and-debugged-by: @nitramiz
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The spec says not to send a commitment_signed without any changes, but LND
does this. To understand why, you have to understand how LND works. I
haven't read the code, but I'm pretty sure it works like this:
1. lnd slows down to do garbage collection, because it's in Go.
2. When an alert timer goes off, noticing it's not making process, it
sends a twitter message to @roasbeef.
3. @roasbeef sshs into the user's machine and binary patches lnd to send
a commitment_signed message.
4. Unfortunately he works so fast that various laws of causality are broken,
meaning sometimes the commitment_signed is sent before any of thes
other things happen.
I'm fairly sure that this will stop as @roasbeef ages, or lnd introduces
some kind of causality enforcement fix.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This also allows plugins to do "hold invoices" a-la LND, useful for
just-in-time inventory handling.
We're careful to handle the invoice getting paid behind our backs, and
the incoming HTLC going away.
Once @cdecker's sphinx rework is in, we can also hand the raw payload
to the invoice_payment_hook, for special effects.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For online services, shorter may be fine, but for casual use I'm usually
in a different timezone than the payer, so needs to be at least 1 day.
Certainly 1 hr is short if they have to open a channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The user can explicitly create such things (within [] or ") as we paste
those cases literally, but not for the simple cases.
Fixes: #2550
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Travis caught an error where this happened: when closingd reconnects it
was sending the reestablish message without the option_dataloss_protect
fields. That causes the peer to fail the channel!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Rename channel_funding_locked to channel_funding_depth in
channeld/channel_wire.csv.
2. Add minimum_depth in struct channel in common/initial_channel.h and
change corresponding init function: new_initial_channel().
3. Add confirmation_needed in struct peer in channeld/channeld.c.
4. Rename channel_tell_funding_locked to channel_tell_depth.
5. Call channel_tell_depth even if depth < minimum, and still call
lockin_complete in channel_tell_depth, iff depth > minimum_depth.
6. channeld ignore the channel_funding_depth unless its >
minimum_depth(except to update billboard, and set
peer->confirmation_needed = minimum_depth - depth).
We set the version BIP32_VER_TEST_PRIVATE for testnet/regtest
BIP32 privkey generation with libwally-core, and set
BIP32_VER_MAIN_PRIVATE for mainnet.
For litecoin, we also set it like bitcoin else.
lightning_connectd(19780): STATUS_FAIL_INTERNAL_ERROR: Failed to bind on 2 socket: Address family not supported by protocol
"Untested code is buggy code"
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And fix trivial typo in MAKING-RELEASES.md, and date retreival in
build-release.sh and repro-build.sh (real git tags start with v!)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
New name is less confusing, and most people should be transitioning to
listpays rather than this anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is to future-proof against multi-part-payments: the low-level commands
will start returning multiple results once we have that, so prepare
transition plan now.
Closes: #2372
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the same deprecation, but one level up. For the moment, we
still support invoices with a `h` field (where description will be
necessary) but that will be removed once this option is removed.
Note that I just changed pylightning without backwards compatibility,
since the field was unlikely to be used, but we could do something
more complex here?
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This field was used by `pay` to hold the bolt11 description if the bolt11
string used `h` to hash the description (which nobody ever did). If the
`h` field wasn't present, it could contain anything, as it wasn't checked.
It's really useful to have a label for payments (eg. '1 Cuban'), but adding
yet-another option would be painful, so we simply rename 'description'
to 'label' except inside the db.
This means we need to do some tricky parameter parsing to handle array
and keyword JSON arguments, but only until we remove the old name.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without this, there's no proof of payment, since it is the signed invoice
that make the receipt valid.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I tried to fundchannel 0.01btc, and of course it wanted 8 decimals exactly.
If I can't get this right, it's probably a bad idea.
I still don't allow whole number of btc though, since that's probably a mistake
and you're not supposed to put that much in c-lightning yet :)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular this matches the case of `their_unilateral/to_us` outputs, which
were missing their addresses so far.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Little point having users handle the postfixes manually, this
translates them, and also allows Millisatoshi to be used wherever an
'int' would be previously.
There are also helpers to create the formatting in a way c-lightning's
JSONRPC will accept.
All standard arithmetic operations with integers work.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
LND seems to do this occasionally, though fixed in new versions. Workaround
in the meantime.
I tested this by hacking our code to send it prematurely, and this worked.
Fixes: #2219
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to still accept it when parsing the database, but this flag
should allow upgrade testing for devs building on top
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Also one less headache for reproducible builds. But unlike
libsodium, this only seems common in Ubuntu.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Up until now, riskfactor was useless due to implementation bugs, and
also the default setting is wrong (too low to have an effect on
reasonable payment scenarios).
Let's simplify the definition (by assuming that P(failure) of a node
is 1), to make it a simple percentage. I examined the current network
fees to see what would work, and under this definition, a default of
10 seems reasonable (equivalent to 1000 under the old definition).
It is *this* change which finally fixes our test case! The riskfactor
is now 40msat (1500000 * 14 * 10 / 5259600 = 39.9), comparable with
worst-case fuzz is 50msat (1001 * 0.05 = 50).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
trueptolemy
Michael Schmoock
Christian Decker
trueptolemy