Currently the only source for amount_asset is the value getter on a tx output,
and we don't hand it too far around (mainly ignoring it if it isn't the
chain's main currency). Eventually we could bubble them up to the wallet, use
them to select outputs or actually support assets in the channels.
Since we don't hand them around too widely I thought it was ok for them to be
pass-by-value rather than having to allocate them and pass them around by
reference. They're just 41 bytes currently so the overhead should be ok.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
We now have a pointer to chainparams, that fails valgrind if we do anything
chain-specific before setting it.
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
We used to match specifically on `is_elements && coinbase`, but we can just
hand off responsibility to libwally and then make sure we handle it correctly.
Turns out that if we have the init message contain both the chainparams as
well as a transaction that needs to be parsed we need to set the parser to
elements mode before we reach the transaction...
531c8d7d9b
In this one, we always send my_current_per_commitment_point, though it's
ignored. And we have our official feature numbers.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The largest change is inside hsmd: it hands a null per-commitment key
to the wallet to tell it to spend the to_remote output.
It can also now resolve unknown commitments, even if it doesn't have a
possible_remote_per_commitment_point from the peer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the normal convention for this type; it makes using converters
a little easier. See next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the other origin, besides `bitcoin_tx`, where we create `bitcoin_tx`
instances, so add the context as soon as possible. Sadly I can't weave the
chainparams into the deserialization code since that'd need to change all the
generated wire code as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The way we build transactions, serialize them, and compute fees depends on the
chain we are working on, so let's add some context to the transactions.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Instead of freeing proposals, which we did in *some* places, we just
set ->resolved and check that in billboard_update which didn't get it right.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Pubkeys are not not actually DER encoding, but Pieter Wuille corrected
me: it's SEC 1 documented encoding.
Results from 5 runs, min-max(mean +/- stddev):
store_load_msec,vsz_kb,store_rewrite_sec,listnodes_sec,listchannels_sec,routing_sec,peer_write_all_sec
38922-39297(39180.6+/-1.3e+02),2880728,41.040000-41.160000(41.106+/-0.05),2.270000-2.530000(2.338+/-0.097),44.570000-53.980000(49.696+/-3),32.840000-33.080000(32.95+/-0.095),43.060000-44.950000(43.696+/-0.72)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Weaning `onchaind` off its use of the internal bitcoin_tx input and output
fields, since we're going to remove them soon, I promise.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The `wally_tx_input`s do not keep track of their input value, which means we
need to track them ourselves if we try to sign these transactions at a later
point in time.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
onchaind is in the correct position to tell us about them, so have it pass
them up as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
As a side-effect of using amount_msat in gossipd/routing.c, we explicitly
handle overflows and don't need to pre-prune ridiculous-fee channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian and I both unwittingly used it in form:
*tal_arr_expand(&x) = tal(x, ...)
Since '=' isn't a sequence point, the compiler can (and does!) cache
the value of x, handing it to tal *after* tal_arr_expand() moves it
due to tal_resize().
The new version is somewhat less convenient to use, but doesn't have
this problem, since the assignment is always evaluated after the
resize.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is mainly just copying over the copy-editing from the
lightning-rfc repository.
[ Split to just perform changes after the UNKNOWN_PAYMENT_HASH change --RR ]
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
This is mainly just copying over the copy-editing from the
lightning-rfc repository.
[ Split to just perform changes prior to the UNKNOWN_PAYMENT_HASH change --RR ]
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
This is prep work for when we sign htlc txs with
SIGHASH_SINGLE|SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY.
We still deal with raw signatures for the htlc txs at the moment, since
we send them like that across the wire, and changing that was simply too
painful (for the moment?).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For onchaind we need to remove globals from memleak consideration;
we also change the htlc pointer to an htlc copy, which simplifies
things as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When we have multiple HTLCs with the same preimage and the same CLTV,
it doesn't matter what order we treat them (they're literally
identical). But when we offer HTLCs with the same preimage but
different CLTVs, the commitment tx outputs look identical, but the
HTLC txs are different: if we simply take the first HTLC which matches
(and that's not the right one), the HTLC signature we got from them
won't match. As we rely on the signature matching to detect the fee
paid, we get:
onchaind: STATUS_FAIL_INTERNAL_ERROR: grind_fee failed
So we alter match_htlc_output() to return an array of all matching
HTLC indices, which can have more than one entry for offered HTLCs.
If it's our commitment, we loop through until one of the HTLC
signatures matches. If it's their commitment, we choose the HTLC with
the largest CLTV: we're going to ignore it once that hits anyway, so
this is the most conservative approach. If it's a penalty, it doesn't
matter since we steal all HTLC outputs the same independent of CLTV.
For accepted HTLCs, the CLTV value is encoded in the witness script,
so this confusion isn't possible. We nonetheless assert that the
CLTVs all match in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell
darosior
William Casarin