We have sanity checks in there that it's a valid point. Simply store
the JSON token like we do with others.
time lightning-cli -R --network=regtest --lightning-dir /tmp/ltests-k8jhvtty/test_pay_stress_1/lightning-1/ listpays > /dev/null
Before:
real 0m2.054s
user 0m0.114s
sys 0m0.024s
After:
real 0m1.781s
user 0m0.127s
sys 0m0.013s
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
time lightning-cli -R --network=regtest --lightning-dir /tmp/ltests-k8jhvtty/test_pay_stress_1/lightning-1/ listpays > /dev/null
Before:
real 0m12.447s
user 0m0.143s
sys 0m0.008s
After:
real 0m2.054s
user 0m0.114s
sys 0m0.024s
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
memmem is also O(n^2), though it's faster. Now we have infrastructure,
let's do incremental parsing.
time lightning-cli -R --network=regtest --lightning-dir /tmp/ltests-k8jhvtty/test_pay_stress_1/lightning-1/ listpays > /dev/null
Before:
real 0m13.674s
user 0m0.131s
sys 0m0.024s
After:
real 0m12.447s
user 0m0.143s
sys 0m0.008s
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This doesn't make any difference, since lightningd generally sends us
short commands (command responses are via the rpc loop, which is
already done), but it's harmless.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The jsmn parser is a beautiful piece of code. In particular, you can parse
part of a string, then continue where you left off.
We don't take advantage of this, however, meaning for large JSON objects
we parse them multiple times before finally having enough to complete.
Expose the parser state and tokens through the API, so the caller can pass
them in repeatedly. For the moment, every caller is allocates each time
(except the unit tests).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to change the API on the more complete JSON parser, so
make and use a simple API for the easy cases.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Tested on a test node which had made 50,000 payment, with no optimization.
For comparison, time for 'listsendpays' was 0.983s.
time lightning-cli -R --network=regtest --lightning-dir /tmp/ltests-k8jhvtty/test_pay_stress_1/lightning-1/ listpays > /dev/null
Before:
real 0m52.415s
user 0m0.127s
sys 0m0.044s
After:
real 0m42.741s
user 0m0.149s
sys 0m0.016s
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: libplugin: significant speedups for reading large JSON replies (e.g. calling listsendpays on large nodes, or listchannels / listnodes).
It's currently always 0, but it won't be once we replace txprepare.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel` has new `outnum` field indicating which output of the transaction funds the channel.
Reported-by: ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
Changelog-Fixed: pay: Correct a case where we put the sub-payment value instead of the *total* value in the `total_msat` field of a multi-part payment.
Only advance through routehints if no route was found at all, or if the
estimated capacity at the routehint is lower than the amount that we
have to send through the routehint.
Changelog-Fixed: pay: Be less aggressive with forgetting routehints.
listpays: make doc-all missed
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpays` can be used to query payments using the `payment_hash`
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpays` now includes the `payment_hash`
Changelog-None: cleanup only.
Before this change:
```
$ ls -l plugins/bcli
-rwxrwxr-x 1 zmnscpxj zmnscpxj 1914976 Aug 5 21:54 plugins/bcli
```
After this change:
```
$ ls -l plugins/bcli
-rwxrwxr-x 1 zmnscpxj zmnscpxj 1830552 Aug 5 22:00 plugins/bcli
```
We already duplicate a lot of code between `lightningd` and eeach
builtin plugin because we do not use .so for `common/`, but including
an object file with code that is not referenced in the executable is
fairly low-hanging size optimization fruit.
Changelog-Fixed: pay: Fixed a bug where routehints would be ignored if the payment exceeded 10,000 satoshi. This is particularly bad if the payee is only reachable via routehints in an invoice.
It's not all that rare to do these operations, and requiring annotations
for it is a little painful.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Arguably a low-priority bug since no current node ever generates routehints longer
than one hop.
However, it is possible as an edge case, if the destination is directly accessible
*and* supports multiple channels, that we route through the destination, one of the
*other* channels it has not in the routehint, to the entry point, and then through
the routehint.
This change removes the risk of the above edge case.
Changelog-None: arguably a low-priority bug.
We've had problems with blocksonly in the past and bitcoind still allows
to use outdated (thus potentially dangerous estimates) while running
bitcoin with -blocksonly.
ZmnSCPxj mentionned that we still don't document this, but i figured
that in this specific case an explicit check and error seems preferable.
Changelog-Added: We now explicitly check at startup that our default Bitcoin backend (bitcoind) does relay transactions.
Proposed-by: ZmnSCPxj <zmnscpxj@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
This allows us to kill two birds with one stone: once connected, we use
the output of the successful call to do some sanity checks (only
checking the version for now, but more are yet to come!).
Changelog-Added: We now explicitly check at startup the version of our default Bitcoin backend (bitcoind).
Co-Authored-by: ZmnSCPxj <zmnscpxj@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
We'd previously take the failed attempt and estimate the failing channel's
capacity at 3/4 of the attempted amount, which is rather aggressive. This
reduces this aggressiveness to use the exact amount tried, but excluding on
equality. This still skips attempting the same route with the same amount, but
also permits attempts that are in the range [3/4, 1] of the failed attempt
amount to still be attempted.
We sum up the amounts just like we do with `amount_sent`, however we may have
parts that don't have that annotation, so make it optional.
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
While not directly necessary, it still feeds the `listpays` result, and so we
should pass it along if we can, so we don't have to rely solely on the
`amount_sent` field, which includes the fees.
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
The shortcut in the retry_mod that we can skip retrying if getroute fails or
we have no result is only valid if the parameters don't change. As we iterate
through the routehints the parameters change, and so we must signal to the
retry_mod that it can retry even in those cases.
The child payments will sometimes depend on the step of the parent, and making
sure that the parent state is correct before we create the children is
therefore important.
This uses @cdecker's idea of excluding the routehinted channel from the route,
and also consumes the route hints as it goes so that it makes progress.
I don't know if this is correct, but it reliably passes tests/test_pay.py::test_tlv_or_legacy
now.
We store an offset of the current routehint in the modifier data. It gets
incremented on retry, and it gets reset to 0 on split. This is because once we
split we have a different amount and a previously unusable routehint becomes
usable again.
We have two places we need to do that now: in the root payment after we
checked if the destination is reachable, and in any other payment directly in
the initialization-step callback.
It was spread over the step callback, but we only need to initialize the
routehints array there, child-payments can just inherit most of the information.
This does two things: it checks if the destination of the payment is at all
reachable without routehints, and if it is it adds a direct attempt as option
to the routehints in the form of a NULL routehint. It also simplifies the
selection of the routehint since the direct case is no longer special, instead
we just return a NULL routehint as if it were a normal routehint.
The adaptive MPP test was showing an issue with always using a routehint, even
when it wasn't necessary: we would insist on routhing to the entrypoint of the
routehint, even through the actual destination. If a channel on that loop
would result being over capacity we'd slam below 0, and then increase again by
unapplying the route. The solution really is not to insist on routing through
a routehint, so we implement random skipping of routehints, and we rotate them
if we have multiples.
As the hints get new fields added it is easy to forget to amend one of the
places we create them, since we already have an update method let's use that
to handle all additions to the array of known channel hints.
We were removing the current hint from the list and not inheriting the current
routehint, so we'd be forgetting a hint at each retry. Now we keep the array
unchanged in the root, and simply skip the ones that are not usable given the
current information we have about the channels (in the form of channel_hints).
Fixes#3861
This may be related to the issue #3862, however the water was muddied by it
being the wrong error to return, and the node should not expect this courtesy
feature to be present at all...
There is little point in trying to split if the resulting HTLCs exceed the
maximum number of HTLCs we can add to our channels. So abort if a split would
result in more HTLCs than our channels can support.
The presplit modifier could end up exceeding the maximum number of HTLCs we
can add to a channel right out the gate, so we switch to a dynamic presplit if
that is the case. The presplit will now at most use 1/3rd of the available
HTLCs on the channels if the normal split would exceed the number of availabe
HTLCs. And we also abort early if we don't have a sufficient HTLCs available.
ZmnSCPxj jxPCSnmZ
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Vincenzo Palazzo
Vincent
Antoine Poinsot