aka "BOLT 3: Use revocation key hash rather than revocation key",
which builds on top of lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc#105 "BOLT 2,3,5:
Make htlc outputs of the commitment tx spendable with revocation key".
This affects callers, since they now need to hand us the revocation
pubkey, but commit_tx has that already anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All the daemons will use a common seed for point derivation, so drag
it out of lightningd/opening.
This also provide a nice struct wrapper to reduce argument count.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We should start watching for the transaction before we send the
signature; we might miss it otherwise. In practice, we only see
transactions as they enter a block, so it won't happen, but be
thorough.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The spec 4af8e1841151f0c6e8151979d6c89d11839b2f65 uses a 32-byte 'channel-id'
field, not to be confused with the 8-byte short ID used by gossip. Rename
appropriately, and update to the new handshake protocol.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Only minor changes, but I add some more spec text to
lightningd/test/run-commit_tx.c to be sure to catch if it changes
again.
One reference isn't upstream yet, so had to be commented out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we've tested it:
1. open_channel needs to write response to REQ_FD not STATUS_FD.
2. recv_channel needs to send our next_per_commit, not echo theirs!
3. print the problematic signature if it's wrong, not our own.
Cleanups:
1. Return the message from open_channel/recv_channel for simplicity.
2. Trace signing information.
3. More tracing messages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Or for blackbox tests --gdb1=<subdaemon> / --gdb2=<subdaemon>.
This makes the subdaemon wait as soon as it's execed, so we can attach
the debugger.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The requirements for accepting the remote config are more complex than
a simple min/max value, as various parameters are related. It turns
out that with a few assumptions, we can boil this down to:
1. The valid feerate range.
2. The minimum effective HTLC throughput we want
3. The a maximum delay we'll accept for us to redeem.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell