I crashed the HSMD, and it gave no output at all. That's because we
were only reading the status fd when we were waiting for a reply.
Fix this by using a separate request fd and status fd, which also means
that hsm_sync_read() is no longer required.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
(This was sitting in my gossip-enchancement patch queue, but it simplifies
this set too, so I moved it here).
In 94711969f we added an explicit gossip_index so when gossipd gets
peers back from other daemons, it knows what gossip it has sent (since
gossipd can send gossip after the other daemon is already complete).
This solution is insufficient for the more general case where gossipd
wants to send other messages reliably, so replace it with the other
solution: have gossipd drain the "gossip fd" which the daemon returns.
This turns out to be quite simple, and is probably how I should have
done it originally :(
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means the caller needs to supply an explicit log to base the
subd log on, and also a callback for error handling.
The callback is kind of ugly, but it gets reworked towards the end
of this series.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a bit messier than I'd like, but we want to clearly remove all
dev code (not just have it uncalled), so we remove fields and functions
altogether rather than stub them out. This means we put #ifdefs in callers
in some places, but at least it's explicit.
We still run tests, but only a subset, and we run with NO_VALGRIND under
Travis to avoid increasing test times too much.
See-also: #176
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are now only two kinds of subdaemons: global ones (hsmd, gossipd) and
per-peer ones. We can handle many callbacks internally now.
We can have a handler to set a new peer owner, and automatically do
the cleanup of the old one if necessary, since we now know which ones
are per-peer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This change is really to allow us to have a --dev-fail-on-subdaemon-fail option
so we can handle failures from subdaemons generically.
It also neatens handling so we can have an explicit callback for "peer
did something wrong" (which matters if we want to close the channel in
that case).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We had a terrible hack in gossip when a peer didn't exist. Formalize
a pattern when code+200 is a failure (with no fds passed), and use it
here.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use a file descriptor, so when we consume an entry, we move past it
(and everyone shares a file offset, so this works).
The file contains packet names prefixed by - (treat fd as closed when
we try to write this packet), + (write the packet then ensure the file
descriptor fails), or @ ("lose" the packet then ensure the file
descriptor fails).
The sync and async peer-write functions hook this in automatically.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'test-run-cryptomsg__fix_compilation.patch':
test/run-cryptomsg: fix compilation.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This uses a single fd for both status and control.
To make this work, we enforce the convention that replies are the same
as requests + 100, and that their name ends in "_REPLY".
This also means that various daemons can simply exit when done; there's
no race between reading request and closing status fds.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
ZmnSCPxj
practicalswift