'rhash' is the old terminology, but 'payment_preimage' and
'payment_hash' were decided on for the BOLTs, so we should fix that here.
We still use rhash internally, but that's much easier to fix.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1) Note incorrect label in txs in Fig1 of LN paper.
2) "an atomic-swap an on-chain.." -> "an atomic-swap *to* an on-chain"
3) "By using a dual anchor and escape transactions" -> "By using a rebalanced single anchor"
4) References to appendices fixed.
5) Move escape transaction scripts out to escape appendix.
6) Fix URL in bibliography (missing comma).
Reported-by: John Newbery
Closes: #11Closes: #12
Reported-by:
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can save an opcode in both HTLC send and receive scripts by using
OP_2DROP instead of OP_DROP twice.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
StephenM347 on #lightning-dev indicated it could be clearer that
this is all about changing commitment transactions.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's slightly clearer to do the "2" outside the branch.
Also, spending it requires the extra 0 due to OP_CHECKMULTISIG bug.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As reported by mmeijeri on r/Bitcoin:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3dlxw4/reaching_the_ground_with_lightning_lightning/ct80xpp
As the signature doesn't cover the input itself, you could replace the
secret key from the escape transaction with 0, and it will use the "A and B"
branch of the output.
(This also fixes a bug in the anchor output where the OP_IF consumed the
secret).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
ZmnSCPxj
practicalswift
Damian Mee
Christian Decker
Denis Gorbachev
Douglas Roark
pm47