I tried to just do gossipd, but it was uncontainable, so this ended up being
a complete sweep.
We didn't get much space saving in gossipd, even though we should save
24 bytes per node.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
New name is less confusing, and most people should be transitioning to
listpays rather than this anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This field was used by `pay` to hold the bolt11 description if the bolt11
string used `h` to hash the description (which nobody ever did). If the
`h` field wasn't present, it could contain anything, as it wasn't checked.
It's really useful to have a label for payments (eg. '1 Cuban'), but adding
yet-another option would be painful, so we simply rename 'description'
to 'label' except inside the db.
This means we need to do some tricky parameter parsing to handle array
and keyword JSON arguments, but only until we remove the old name.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without this, there's no proof of payment, since it is the signed invoice
that make the receipt valid.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to do it in various places, but we shouldn't do it lightly:
the primitives are there to help us get overflow handling correct.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As a side-effect of using amount_msat in gossipd/routing.c, we explicitly
handle overflows and don't need to pre-prune ridiculous-fee channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to add 'amount_msat' to getroute, but it's common to feed
'getroute' back into 'sendpay', so sendpay should allow it.
If both are specified, make sure they're the same!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I got a spurious failure because the final node gave a CLTV error and
so it decided to use a different channel. It should probably handle
this corner case better, but meanwhile make the test robust.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
List the final one instead; if there's an error from the node it
may actually make sense to blame that channel (ie. previous node
did something wrong).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We no longer need a 'sendpay_result' structure, we can pass
appropriate parameter directly now they're simple calls.
Every waitsendpay command ends in tell_waiters_failed or
tell_waiters_success, which call sendpay_success or sendpay_fail on
all matching waiters. These all return 'struct command_result *'.
In cases where the result is immediately known, we call
sendpay_success/sendpay_fail directly for the command.
This also adds a helpful 'failcodename' field to the JSON output.
[ This was four separate cleanup patches, but that contained much
redundancy and was even worse to review ]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With only one caller, we don't need a callback pointer any more; we can simply
call the function.
This required some code shuffling, and I changed the callback function
arguments to be in a more natural order, now they're not used as
callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we don't have a second caller for these routines, we can move
them back into pay.c and make the functions static.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As a general rule, lightningd shouldn't parse user packets. We move the
parsing into gossipd, and have it respond only to permanent failures.
Note that we should *not* unconditionally remove a channel on
WIRE_INVALID_ONION_HMAC, as this can be triggered (and we do!) by
feeding sendpay a route with an incorrect pubkey.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian points out that we can iterate by ->size rather than calling
json_next() to find the end (which traverses the entire object!).
Now ->size is reliable (since previous patch), this is OK.
Reported-by: @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fortunately, we can calculate the sha256 ourselves, so the
outgoing channeld doesn't need to tell us.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The node which sent the error is doing so because the following
one sent WIRE_UPDATE_FAIL_MALFORMED_HTLC.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Obviously the Facebook relationship status joke was a bit subtle, but I've
continued it anyway because I'm especially susceptible to Dad jokes.
Suggested-by: @niftynei
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This causes a compiler warning if we don't do something with the
result (hopefully return immediately!).
We use was_pending() to ignore the result in the case where we
complete a command in a callback (thus really do want to ignore
the result).
This actually fixes one bug: we didn't return after command_fail
in json_getroute with a bad seed value.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Usually, this means they return 'command_param_failed()' if param()
fails, and changing 'command_success(); return;' to 'return
command_success()'.
Occasionally, it's more complex: there's a command_its_complicated()
for the case where we can't exactly determine what the status is,
but it should be considered a last resort.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Handers of a specific form are both designed to be used as callbacks
for param(), and also dispose of the command if something goes wrong.
Make them return the 'struct command_result *' from command_failed(),
or NULL.
Renaming them just makes sense: json_tok_XXX is used for non-command-freeing
parsers too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
json_escaped.[ch], param.[ch] and jsonrpc_errors.h move from lightningd/
to common/. Tests moved too.
We add a new 'common/json_tok.[ch]' for the common parameter parsing
routines which a plugin might want, taking them out of
lightningd/json.c (which now only contains the lightningd-specific
ones).
The rest is mainly fixing up includes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This (will) avoid the plugin having to walk back from the params object
as it currently does.
No code changes; I removed UNUSED and UNNEEDED labels from the other
parameters though (as *every* json_rpc callback needs to call param()
these days, they're *always* used).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Such an API is required for when we stream it directly. Almost all our
handlers fit this pattern already, or nearly do.
We remove new_json_result() in favor of explicit json_stream_success()
and json_stream_fail(), but still allowing command_fail() if you just
want a simple all-in-one fail wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't expect payment or payment->route_channels to be NULL without an
old db, but putting an assert there reveals that we try to fail an HTLC
which has already succeeded in 'test_onchain_unwatch'.
Obviously we only want to fail an HTLC which goes onchain if we don't
already have the preimage!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Note: Unlike before, this will now accept positional parameters.
Note: In case of error we no longer report the hop number. Is this acceptable?
We still report the name of the bad param and its value.
One option is to log the hop number if param() returns false. This would require
a change to command_fail so it doesn't delete the cmd, so we can still
access cmd->ld->log.
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
This was a very simple change and allowed us to remove the special
`json_opt_tok` macro.
Moved the callback out of `common/json.c` to `lightningd/json.c` because the new
callbacks are dependent on `struct command` etc.
(I already started on `json_tok_number`)
My plan is to:
1. upgrade json_tok_X one a time, maybe a PR for each one.
2. When done, rename macros (i.e, remove "_tal").
3. Remove all vestiges of the old callbacks
4. Add new callbacks so that we no longer need json_tok_tok!
(e.g., json_tok_label, json_tok_str, json_tok_msat)
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
This adds one line with the onion and the channel_update we extract from
it. This in turn allows us to check that the channel_update in the onion is not
type prefixed, and that we patch it correctly before passing it to gossipd.
As was pointed out by @robtex we have underspecified the format of the nested
`channel_update` in the onionreply: lnd and eclair inserted the raw
channel_update without the type prefix, while we went for the full wire format,
including the type prefix. While we agreed that with the type it is more
flexible, and consistent, we decided to adapt to the majority and at least be
compatibly broken.
This commit takes care of being able to interpret either format correctly. It's
not perfect since signatures can happen to start with 0x0102 (the channel_update
type) but that'll happen only once ever 65k failures.
Rusty Russell
Mark Beckwith
Mark Beckwith
Christian Decker