The peer shouldn't try, and channeld won't try to add it if it does,
but we shouldn't trust it. And it would make our htlc_in_check() code
assert.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For performance, we delay entering the 'wallet_payment' into the db
until we actually commit to the HTLC (when we have to touch the DB
anyway).
This opens a race where we can try to pay twice, and since it's not in
the database yet, we don't notice the duplicate.
So remove the temporary payment field from htlc_out, which was always
an uncomfortable hack, and make the wallet code abstract over the
deferred entry a little by maintaining a 'unstored_payments' list
and incorporating that in results.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This, of course, should never be used. But it helps maintain connections
for the moment while we dig deeper into feerates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Pulling up the save call from `peer_save_commitsig_received` into its
caller `peer_got_commitsig` and adding a call to
`peer_sending_commitsig`
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Paid invoices need to know how much was actually paid: both for the case
where no 'msatoshi' amount was specified, and for the normal case, where
clients are permitted to overpay in order to help them disguise their
payments.
While we migrate the db, we leave this field as 0 for old paid
invoices. This is unhelpful for accounting, but at least clearly
indicates what happened if we find this in the wild.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. htlc->fail has been changed to a u8 *.
2. wallet_get_newindex saves to the db.
3. peer->next_htlc_id is saved to the db in peer_save_commitsig_sent() below.
4. We do store commit in peer_save_commitsig_received(peer, commitnum),
and the fixme below talks about HTLC sigs.
5. We do commit shachain and next_per_commit_point in wallet_shachain_add_hash
and update_per_commit_point respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This gives us a lower bound on where funding tx could be.
In theory, it could be lower than this if we get a reorganization, but
in practice this is already a 1-block buffer (since we can't get into
current block, only the next one).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the normal (peer-to-peer) path, the HTLC state prevents us fulfilling
twice, but this goes out the window with onchain HTLCs.
The actual assert which caught it was lightningd/pay.c:70 (payment_succeeded)
in the test_htlc_in_timeout test, after the next commit.
So add an assert earlier (in fulfill_our_htlc_out) and check in the
one caller where it can be true.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We set hout->key.id when channeld tells us what it is, but if channeld
dies before that we free the hout, and our destructor logs it:
Valgrind error file: valgrind-errors.20312
==20312== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==20312== at 0x53ABC9B: _itoa_word (_itoa.c:179)
==20312== by 0x53B041F: vfprintf (vfprintf.c:1642)
==20312== by 0x53B17D5: buffered_vfprintf (vfprintf.c:2330)
==20312== by 0x53AEAA5: vfprintf (vfprintf.c:1301)
==20312== by 0x53B7D63: fprintf (fprintf.c:32)
==20312== by 0x128BAC: hout_subd_died (peer_htlcs.c:316)
==20312== by 0x16D8E0: notify (tal.c:240)
==20312== by 0x16DD95: del_tree (tal.c:400)
==20312== by 0x16DDE7: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==20312== by 0x16DDE7: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==20312== by 0x16E1B4: tal_free (tal.c:509)
==20312== by 0x162B5C: io_close (io.c:443)
==20312== by 0x12D563: sd_msg_read (subd.c:508)
==20312== by 0x161EA5: next_plan (io.c:59)
==20312== by 0x1629A2: do_plan (io.c:387)
==20312== by 0x1629E0: io_ready (io.c:397)
==20312== by 0x164319: io_loop (poll.c:305)
==20312== by 0x118E21: main (lightningd.c:334)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The master now hands channeld either an error code, and channeld
generates the error message, or an error message relayed from another
node to pass through.
This doesn't fill in the channel_update yet: we need to wire up gossipd
to give us that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Currently lightningd does this, but channeld is perfectly capable of doing it.
channeld is also in a far better position to add channel_updates to it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
estimatesmartfee 4 ECONOMICAL was too high for lnd, so drop it, with some
increased security risk.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This addresses a performance regression introduced by
6ceb375650. We were storing it in an
otherwise empty DB transaction, which means that DB transaction was no
longer a no-op. Now we defer storing until we need to store the
corresponding HTLC anyway, so we can just piggyback on top of that
transaction.
This is also more consistent since we'd be forgetting the payment
anyway if we restart between adding the HTLC and committing to it.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We only send them when we're not awaiting revoke_and_ack: our
simplified handling can't deal with multiple in flights.
Closes: #244
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We are announcing that we are willing to accept incoming payments with
current_height + min_final_cltv_expiry + slack, assuming that the
sender adds some slack. In particular we'd reject the payment if
slack=0 which is allowed by the spec.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
And nail "make check-source" to that specific version (which is a commit id,
not a branch name, so needs a different syntax for git).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These need to be different for testing the example in BOLT 11.
We also use the cltv_final instead of deadline_blocks in the final hop:
various tests assumed 5 was OK, so we tweak utils.py.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are others, but they really are casued by bad failure. We need a
parachute system for these.
Closes: #176
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We pull them from the database on-demand, where we're storing them
anyway. No need to keep them in memory as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
When we see an offered HTLC onchain, we need to use the preimage if we
know it. So we dump all the known HTLC preimages at startup, and send
new ones as we discover them.
This doesn't cover preimages we know because we're the final
recipient; that can happen if an HTLC hasn't been irrevocably
committed yet. We'll do that in a followup patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
ZmnSCPxj
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker