They are quite chatty and fail very rarely, so let's not have them spam our
logs. Failures should print to stderr anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Previously, by uncommenting NO_VALGRIND in Makefile, the variable
was not propagated and the pytest children processes would still
try to use Valgrind.
Until now, `command_fail()` reported an error code of -1 for all uses.
This PR adds an `int code` parameter to `command_fail()`, requiring the
caller to explicitly include the error code.
This is part of #1464.
The majority of the calls are used during parameter validation and
their error code is now JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS.
The rest of the calls report an error code of LIGHTNINGD, which I defined to
-1 in `jsonrpc_errors.h`. The intention here is that as we improve our error
reporting, all occurenaces of LIGHTNINGD will go away and we can eventually
remove it.
I also converted calls to `command_fail_detailed()` that took a `NULL` `data`
parameter to use the new `command_fail()`.
The only difference from an end user perspecive is that bad input errors that
used to be -1 will now be -32602 (JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS).
Proposed fix for issue #1231 - FreeBSD (tcsh) build problem due
to HOST environment variable.
The variable is used for cross-compilation. The process may be
improved even further in the future. So far this hot fix.
Mostly `lightningd` complaining about not being able to estimate fees. Safes us
a lot of log space when some tests time out, and safes us a few context switches
between log appender and log watchers.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We were sort of assuming that one side telling it's ok would automagically make
the other side succeed as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
While 1 second is very generous, it resolving the HTLCs may take longer, so we
just loop over this instead of making it one-shot
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The RPC calls aren't really free, so let's wait for absolute times, computed
from the `start_time` instead.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This resolves the problem where both channeld and gossipd can generate
updates, and they can have the same timestamp. gossipd is always able
to generate them, so can ensure timestamp moves forward.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of considering it a temporary step, consider it a necessary preamble
to sending updates.
This means (in the next patch) when we tell gossipd to generate the updates,
it's always done after we've told it to create the channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can restore them once we get parallel testing on Travis, but meanwhile
we time out because of the 30 seconds bitcoind poll.
Running on my laptop with --duration=5:
=========================== slowest 5 test durations ===========================
184.07s call tests/test_lightningd.py::LightningDTests::test_multiple_channels
156.66s call tests/test_lightningd.py::LightningDTests::test_forward
155.77s call tests/test_lightningd.py::LightningDTests::test_closing
126.83s call tests/test_lightningd.py::LightningDTests::test_waitinvoice
126.11s call tests/test_lightningd.py::LightningDTests::test_waitanyinvoice
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Because we have too many which are never used and I don't want to document
them.
1. Remove unused anchor_onchain_wait. When implemented, it should be
hardcoded to 100 or more.
2. Remove anchor_confirms_max. 10 always reasonable, and we can readd
an override option should someone need it.
3. max_htlc_expiry should be the same as locktime_max (which increases
from 3 to 5 days by default): they're both a limit on how long
funds can be locked up.
4. channel_update_interval should always be a dev option.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Make --override-fee-rates a dev option. We use default-fee-rate in
its place, which (since bitcoind won't give fee estimates in regtest
mode for short chains) gives an effective feerate of 15000/7500/3750.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We never hit the guess_feerate() path, because we turned a 0 ("can't
estimate fee") into 253.
This also revealed that we weren't initializing topo->feerate, and
that we were giving spurious updates even if we were using override-fee-rates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We erroneously create updates with the same timestamps when tests run
quickly, and the second one is ignored.
We've already noted that this should be fixed: gossipd should generate
all the updates, as it already has to do the case where channeld
crashed, for example. But that's a bigger change.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we hit depth 6, we would start exchanging announcement signatures.
However, we should still send a temporary update while waiting for the
reply; make the logic clear in this case that we should always send
one or the other.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The condition in send_channel_update is wrong: it needs to match the
conditions under which we send announcements.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
@cdecker points out that in test_forward, where we manually create a route,
we get an error back which contains an update for an unknown channel.
We should still note this, but it's not an error for testing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is something which generally shouldn't happen, but we didn't
notice it previously.
We ignore this warning in the case where a channel was deleted: this
happens because one side can send an update while the other notices
that the channel is closed.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Note: this will break the gossip_store if they have current channels,
but it will fail to parse and be discarded.
Have local_add_channel do just that: the update is logically separate
and can be sent separately.
This removes the ugly 'bool add_to_store' flag.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>