This was a tricky one to find, it turns out that some nodes are sending
node_announcements even if they don't have a channel announced yet. If they are
a peer and the channel is currently verifying then we'll have a local channel in
the network view, hence accept the node_announcement, but when replaying, the
node_announcement will be replayed and we won't have a channel yet. This just
skips node_announcements, which is always safe.
Reported-by: @laszlohanyecz
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Messages from peers and messages from the gossip_store now have completely
different entrypoints, so we don't need to trace their origin around the message
handling code any longer.
This stores and reads the channel_announcements in the wrapping message which
allows us to store associated data with the raw channel_announcements.
The gossip_store applies channel_announcements directly but it also returns it,
and it gets discarded as a duplicate. In the next commit we'll have gossip_store
apply all changes, bypassing verification, so the duplication is only temporary.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Moves any modifications based on an incoming gossip message into its own
function separate from the message verification. This allows us to skip
verification when reading messages from a trusted source, e.g., the
gossip_store, speeding up the gossip replay.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
When we read from the gossip_store we set store=false so that we don't duplicate
messages in the store.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
As we add more features, the current code is insufficient.
1. Keep an array of single feature bits, for easy switching on and off.
2. Create feature_offered() which checks for both compulsory and optional
variants.
3. Invert requires_unsupported_features() and unsupported_features()
which tend to be double-negative, all_supported_features() and
features_supported().
4. Move single feature definition from wire/peer_wire.h to common/features.h.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently keep two copies; one in the broadcast structure to send
in order, and one in the routing information. Since we already keep
the broadcast index in the routing information, use that.
Conveniently, a zero index is the same as the old NULL test.
Rename struct node's announcement_idx to node_announce_msgidx to
make it match the other users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We only access via index. We do, however, want to clean up when we
delete nodes and channels, so we tie lifetimes to that. This leads
us to put the index into 'struct queued_message'.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. make queue_peer_msg() use both if branches, as both equally likely.
2. Remove redundant *scid = NULL in handle_channel_announcement.
3. Log failing pending channel_updates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As per BOLT #7.
We don't do this for channel_update which are queued because the
channel_announcement is pending though.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If the channel is pending, we queue the node_announcment and if the channel
is OK we re-call process_node_announcement. Make sure that second call
won't fail if the first succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We already have 'struct node', so rename 'struct routing_channel' to
'struct chan', and 'struct node_connection' to 'struct half_chan'.
Other minor changes:
1. rstate->channels -> rstate->chanmap.
2. 'connections' -> 'half'.
3. connection_to -> half_chan_to
4. connection_from -> half_chan_from
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The containing `struct routing_channel` contains src and dst, so
remove them. However, the channel_update msgidx does belong int
`struct node_connection` along with the channel_update.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Returning the separate first routing_channel was a weird API: just
return the entire array. Sure, we have to treat the first node a bit
differently (because we don't charge ourselves fees), but it's still
simpler.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To remove the redundant fields in `struct node_connection` (ie. 'src'
and 'dst' pointers) we need to deal with `struct routing_channel`.
This means we get a series of channels, from which the direction is
implied, so it's a bit more complex to decode. We add a helper
`other_node` to help with this, and since we're the only user of
`connection_to` we change that function to return the index.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Failure and pruning were the two places where a node_connection could
be freed; now they both deal with entire channels, we can remove the
NULL checks, and the destructor.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We discarded it; we should populate it. The comment is wrong, since
local_add_channel() doesn't add public channels, and we test that above.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is twice the 'update_channel_interval' we get handed.
We delete the non-existent channel_add_connection and delete_connection
declarations from the header too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently give them a free pass. The simplest fix is to give them
an old timestamp on initialization.
We still skip unannounced channels, on the assumption that they're
ours. And we set the last_update_timestamp to -1 when we convert to
gossip_getchannels_entry to indicate no update.
This breaks the DEVELOPER=1 pruning test, since we hardcode the 1
week timeout. That's fixed in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We make new_routing_channel() populate both connections
(active=false), so local_add_channel becomes simpler. We also
suppress listchannels output of active=false unannounced channels, to
avoid breaking tests (also, these are unusable, so it makes sense to
omit them)
It also seems the logic in add_channel_direction is legacy: a
channel_announce cannot replace the scid (that would be a different
channel), we don't allow duplicate announcements, and the announcement
is never NULL.
And since we disallow repeated channel_announce already, I believe
'forward' is always true, greatly simplifying the logic in
handle_pending_cannouncement.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes 'routing_channel' the primary object in the system; it can have
one or two 'node_connection's attached, and points to two nodes.
The nodes are freed when no more routing_channel refer to them. The
routing_channel are freed when they contain no more 'node_connection'.
This fixes#1072 which I surmise was caused by a dangling
routing_channel after pruning.
Each node contains a single array of 'routing_channel's, not one for
each direction. The 'routing_channel' itself orders nodes in key
order (conveniently the index is equal to the direction flag we use),
and 'node_connection' with source in the same order.
There are helpers to assist with common questions like "which
'node_connection' leads out of this node?".
There are now two ways to find a channel:
1. Direct scid lookup via rstate->channels map.
2. Node key lookup, followed by channel traversal.
Several FIXMEs are inserted for where we can now do things more optimally.
Fixes: #1072
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to make it a first-class citizen, and pending routing_channel
are not real ones (in particular, we don't want to create pending nodes).
We had a linked list called rstate->pending_cannouncement which we didn't
actually use, so put that back for now and add a FIXME to use a faster
data structure.
We need to check that list now in handle_channel_update, but we never
have a real routing_channel and a pending, unless the routing_channel
isn't public.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we have them, let's use them. I missed one case deliberately, since
that causes merge conflicts when I replace it in a following patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I'm not completely conviced that we can't end up removing pending things,
so change asserts to simple returns.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we make destroy_node() remove itself from the map, then we simply
need to free it.
We can batch the frees (as we need) simply by reparenting all the pruned
nodes onto a single temporary parent, then freeing it, relying on tal's
internal datastructures.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
practicalswift
Rusty Russell