Relatively simple: until we reach funding-depth the channels should be
known locally, so we can already route through them, but they should
not be announced to peers to which the connection is non-local.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
If send_htlc_out() fails, it doesn't initialize pc->out; that can
make us think it's still in progress.
Reported-by: Jonas Nick
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All peers come from gossipd, and maintain an fd to talk to it. Sometimes
we hand the peer back, but to avoid a race, we always recreated it.
The race was that a daemon closed the gossip_fd, which made gossipd
forget the peer, then master handed the peer back to gossipd. We stop
the race by never closing the gossipfd, but hand it back to gossipd
for closing.
Now gossipd has to accept two fds, but the handling of peers is far
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We should not disconnect from a peer just because it fails opening; we
should return it to gossipd, and give a meaningful error.
Closes: #401
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't use it yet, but now we'll decode correctly.
See: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/317
lightning-rfc commit: ef053c09431442697ab46e83f9d3f86e3510a18e
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If you run locally, it fails occasionally; presumably because it
sees previous funds. Use a random HSM key for that teste.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I noticed some breakage with git master:
1. getinfo no longer supported (for us, use getblockchaininfo)
2. generate no longer supported (use generatetoaddress)
Both these options are supported at least in 0.15, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This seems to happen when we manage to check between the
channel_announcement and the channel_update being processed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Add two simple tests: one for a single direct payment and one with
hundreds of parallel payments, reusing the same route.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We are announcing that we are willing to accept incoming payments with
current_height + min_final_cltv_expiry + slack, assuming that the
sender adds some slack. In particular we'd reject the payment if
slack=0 which is allowed by the spec.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Raising the exception about non-zero exit values into the
teardown. This was previously masking the valgrind errors. Now
valgrind errors > crash errors > non-zero return value.
Still hoping to catch that elusive [7, 0] return value on travis.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
These need to be different for testing the example in BOLT 11.
We also use the cltv_final instead of deadline_blocks in the final hop:
various tests assumed 5 was OK, so we tweak utils.py.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I run with ulimit -c unlimited, and valgrind leaves core files like
valgrind-errors.22114.core.22114 which test_lightning.py tries to
parse as log files.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It crashes under valgrind, causing a valgrind error: valgrind gives us a
backtrace anyway, so we don't need it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And we report these through the getpeers JSON RPC again (carefully: in
our reconnect tests we can get duplicates which this patch now filters
out).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a bit messier than I'd like, but we want to clearly remove all
dev code (not just have it uncalled), so we remove fields and functions
altogether rather than stub them out. This means we put #ifdefs in callers
in some places, but at least it's explicit.
We still run tests, but only a subset, and we run with NO_VALGRIND under
Travis to avoid increasing test times too much.
See-also: #176
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are now only two kinds of subdaemons: global ones (hsmd, gossipd) and
per-peer ones. We can handle many callbacks internally now.
We can have a handler to set a new peer owner, and automatically do
the cleanup of the old one if necessary, since we now know which ones
are per-peer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now the flow is much simpler from a lightningd POV:
1. If we want to connect to a peer, just send gossipd `gossipctl_reach_peer`.
2. Every new peer, gossipd hands up to lightningd, with global/local features
and the peer fd and a gossip fd using `gossip_peer_connected`
3. If lightningd doesn't want it, it just hands the peerfd and global/local
features back to gossipd using `gossipctl_handle_peer`
4. If a peer sends a non-gossip msg (eg `open_channel`) the gossipd sends
it up using `gossip_peer_nongossip`.
5. If lightningd wants to fund a channel, it simply calls `release_channel`.
Notes:
* There's no more "unique_id": we use the peer id.
* For the moment, we don't ask gossipd when we're told to list peers, so
connected peers without a channel don't appear in the JSON getpeers API.
* We add a `gossipctl_peer_addrhint` for the moment, so you can connect to
a specific ip/port, but using other sources is a TODO.
* We now (correctly) only give up on reaching a peer after we exchange init
messages, which changes the test_disconnect case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently assume the daemon gives up; gossipd won't, and we want to
test it there too.
This reveals a bug (returning io_close() is bad if the call is to
duplex()), and breaks a test which now continues after dropping a
packet..
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Useful if we want to drop & suppress, for example. We change '=' to mean
do nothing to the packet.
We use this to clean up the test_reconnect_sender_add test.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to make the ip/port optional, so they should go at the end.
In addition, using ip:port is nicer, for gethostbyaddr().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We have to do a dance when we get a reconnect in openingd, because we
don't normally expect to free both owner and peer. It's a layering
violation: freeing a peer should clean up the owner's pointer to it,
to avoid a double free, and we can eliminate this dance.
The free order is now different, and the test_reconnect_openingd was
overprecise.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
ZmnSCPxj
practicalswift