The previous tests didn't make sense anyway, but I think they were trying
to exclude onchain channels.
We delete completely forgotten channels anyway now, so we don't need
such testing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The JSON connect command wouldn't terminate if peer reconnected
in a state CHANNELD_AWAITING_LOCKIN or above.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Such an htlc is invalid, and will be failed cleanly by our channeld
(which also checks that it meets the minimum amount), but it's
not the master's job to check it, and in fact, it asserts if we were
to try to pay or forward such a thing.
Fixes: #686
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The peer shouldn't try, and channeld won't try to add it if it does,
but we shouldn't trust it. And it would make our htlc_in_check() code
assert.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
* Add BITCOIN_TEST_PROGRAMS to ALL_TEST_PROGRAMS
* Refactor bitcoin test make directives into its own Makefile under bitcoin/test
Signed-off-by: William Casarin <jb55@jb55.com>
This doesn't cover external libs in general (which *could* be effected by
CFLAGS), but at least all our own objects are rebuilt.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Before this patch:
```
$ lightningd/lightningd
lightningd(PID): Creating lightningd dir /root/.lightning (because chdir gave No such file or directory)
lightningd(PID): Creating database
```
After this patch:
```
$ lightningd/lightningd
lightningd(PID): Creating lightningd dir /root/.lightning
lightningd(PID): Creating database
```
This was flaky because we didn't wait for the fee update to complete
and were using the old, way too small, fees, which upset bitcoind.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
delinvoice was orginally documented to only allow deletion of unpaid
invoices, but there might be reasons to delete paid ones or unexpired ones.
But we have to avoid the race where someone pays as it's deleted: the
easiest way is to have the caller tell us the status, and fail if
it's wrong.
Fixes: #477
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Error code is inverted (which makes sense: who returns 'true' on
error?), and anyway there's a leak if we do error.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>