These tests appear in both test_misc.py and test_wallet.py.
I checked, and they're the only duplcates; they were moved in
0543149b89 then re-added (merge error?)
in 67fc8ffbcf.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
First, simplify: amount is set to 1000000, but then we deposit 1000000 + 0.01btc
(i.e. 2000000), and we always use 2 * amount. Just use a single constant to
make it clear.
Secondly, we assume that the wallet considers outputs spent as soon as
we created the tx: this will not be true once withdraw uses sendpsbt.
So, we generate blocks, but now sometimes withdraw will pick up change
txs, so we need to reserve them to avoid that messing our coinmovements.
Finally, we assumed the withdrawl order was BIP69, which becomes
variable.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Marking spent means if the transaction doesn't confirm for some
reason, the user will need to force a rescan to find the funds. Now
we have timed reservations, reserving for (an additional) 12 hours
should be sufficient.
We also take this opportunity (now we have our own callback path)
to record the tx in the wallet only on success.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Some minor phrasing differences cause test changes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: txprepare reservations stay across restarts: use fundpsbt/reservepsbt/unreservepsbt
Changelog-Removed: txprepare `destination` `satoshi` argument form removed (deprecated v0.7.3)
With a feerate of 7500perkw and subtracting 660 sats for anchors, a
20,000 sat channel has capacity about 9800 sat, below our default:
You gave bad parameters: channel capacity with funding 20000sat, reserves 546sat/546sat, max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat is 18446744073709551615msat, channel capacity is 9818sat, which is below 10000000msat
So bump channel amounts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And document exactly what it does: insist that an HTLC can pass of
this value (module assumptions of feerate).
Note that we remove the "is_opener" test from the capacity calculation
for anchor fees: it doesn't matter which side it is, someone has to pay
for anchor fees to it deducts from capacity.
This change breaks the test, which we rewrite.
Changelog-Changed: config: `min-capacity-sat` is now stricter about checking usable capacity of channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We create ALL_PROGRAMS, ALL_TEST_PROGRAMS, ALL_C_SOURCES and
ALL_C_HEADERS. Then the toplevel Makefile knows which are
autogenerated (by wildcard), so it can have all the rules to clean
them or check the source as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's actually not possible to currently tell if you're using anchor_outputs
with a peer (since it depends on whether you both supported it at *channel open*).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-added: JSON-RPC: `listpeers` shows `features` list for each channel.
We're failing this too often: we'd fail it more but it's disabled
with VALGRIND (it shouldn't be: @slow_test removes VALGRIND if SLOW_MACHINE
is set).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the simplest possible fix: increase the target amount until we get
the desired number of parts, while still bucketizing payments together that
are in approximately the same size.
The current logic puts all payments that are in the range x < amount <= 16*x
in the same bucket, making them harder to distinguish.
Changelog-Fixed: pay: The `presplit` modifier now supports large payments without exhausting the available HTLCs.
You can't pay them anyway, and at least one person used 0 instead of "any".
Closes: #3808
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: `invoice` no longer accepts zero amounts (did you mean "any"?)
This is an extra safety check for dual funding, where we only want to sign
the inputs we provided!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `signpsbt` takes an optional `signonly` array to limit what inputs to sign.
Required for dual funding where the opener sets it.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundpsbt` takes a new `locktime` parameter
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Anchor outputs break many assumptions in our tests:
1. Remove some hardcoded numbers in favor of a fee calc, so we only have to
change in one place.
FIXME: This should also be done for elements!
2. Do binary search to get feerate for a given closing fee.
3. Don't assume output #0: anchor outputs perturb them.
4. Don't assume we can make 1ksat channels (anchors cost 660 sats!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's currently always 0, but it won't be once we replace txprepare.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel` has new `outnum` field indicating which output of the transaction funds the channel.
Reported-by: ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
Changelog-Fixed: pay: Correct a case where we put the sub-payment value instead of the *total* value in the `total_msat` field of a multi-part payment.
The worst effect is that unpublished nodes are harder to pay, but
even published ones make us do unnecessary work, since we are
losing routehints from the published ones that could help us
actually route better to them.
On my test machine, we queried bitcoind before the close tx was sent:
```
# When output is spent, it should give us null !
txo = l1.rpc.call("getutxout", {"txid": txid, "vout": 0})
> assert txo["amount"] is txo["script"] is None
E AssertionError: assert '20000000msat' is '00205b8cd3b914cf67cdd8fa6273c930353dd36476734fbd962102c2df53b90880cd'
tests/test_plugin.py:1221: AssertionError
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It might have already happened, and anyway, we wait for the actual state
below.
```
# make database snapshot of l2
l2.stop()
l2_db_path = os.path.join(l2.daemon.lightning_dir, chainparams['name'], 'lightningd.sqlite3')
l2_db_path_bak = os.path.join(l2.daemon.lightning_dir, chainparams['name'], 'lightningd.sqlite3.bak')
copyfile(l2_db_path, l2_db_path_bak)
l2.start()
sync_blockheight(bitcoind, [l2])
# push some money from l3->l2, so that the commit counter advances
l2.rpc.connect(l3.info['id'], 'localhost', l3.port)
> l2.daemon.wait_for_log('now ACTIVE')
tests/test_closing.py:908:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
contrib/pyln-testing/pyln/testing/utils.py:288: in wait_for_log
return self.wait_for_logs([regex], timeout)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
self = <pyln.testing.utils.LightningD object at 0x7f0c145a32d0>
regexs = ['now ACTIVE'], timeout = 60
def wait_for_logs(self, regexs, timeout=TIMEOUT):
"""Look for `regexs` in the logs.
We tail the stdout of the process and look for each regex in `regexs`,
starting from last of the previous waited-for log entries (if any). We
fail if the timeout is exceeded or if the underlying process
exits before all the `regexs` were found.
If timeout is None, no time-out is applied.
"""
logging.debug("Waiting for {} in the logs".format(regexs))
exs = [re.compile(r) for r in regexs]
start_time = time.time()
pos = self.logsearch_start
while True:
if timeout is not None and time.time() > start_time + timeout:
print("Time-out: can't find {} in logs".format(exs))
for r in exs:
if self.is_in_log(r):
print("({} was previously in logs!)".format(r))
> raise TimeoutError('Unable to find "{}" in logs.'.format(exs))
E TimeoutError: Unable to find "[re.compile('now ACTIVE')]" in logs.
contrib/pyln-testing/pyln/testing/utils.py:264: TimeoutError
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The modded_psbt is not necessarily invalid:
# Try a modified (invalid) PSBT string
modded_psbt = psbt[:-3] + 'A' + psbt[-3:]
with pytest.raises(RpcError, match=r"should be a PSBT, not"):
> l1.rpc.signpsbt(modded_psbt)
E AssertionError: Pattern 'should be a PSBT, not' not found in 'RPC call failed: method: signpsbt, payload: {'psbt': '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'}, error: {'code': -1, 'message': 'No wallet inputs to sign'}'
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
listpays: make doc-all missed
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpays` can be used to query payments using the `payment_hash`
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpays` now includes the `payment_hash`
And when it's set, and we're SLOW_MACHINE, simply disable valgrind.
Since Travis (SLOW_MACHINE=1) only does VALGRIND=1 DEVELOPER=1 tests,
and VALGRIND=0 DEVELOPER=0 tests, it was missing tests which needed
DEVELOPER and !VALGRIND.
Instead, this demotes them to non-valgrind tests for SLOW_MACHINEs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I started replacing all get_node() calls, but got bored, so then just did the
tests which call get_node() 3 times or more.
Ends up not making a measurable speed difference, but it does make some
things neater and more standard.
Times with SLOW_MACHINE=1 (given that's how Travis tests):
Time before (non-valgrind):
393 sec (had 3 failures?)
Time after (non-valgrind):
410 sec
Time before (valgrind):
890 seconds (had 2 failures)
Time after (valgrind):
892 sec
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I thought this was timing out because I made it slow with the
change to txprepare as a plugin. In fact, it was timing out
because sometimes gossip comes so fast it gets suppressed
and we never get the log messags.
Still, before this it took 98 seconds under valgrind and
24 under non-valgrind, so it's an improvement to time as
well as robustness.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Michael Schmoock
Christian Decker
ZmnSCPxj jxPCSnmZ
Vincenzo Palazzo
Vincent