We really want to do this for HTLCs; we don't do anything useful yet, but
this code replaces the direct call to bitcoind_watch_addr().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rather than polling for interesting bitcoin txs via importaddress, we use
the chain topology to register our interest directly.x
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With segregated witness, we can (in advance!) specify the txid or tx
output we want to watch, so convert to that now. For the moment it's
done by pretending we have normalized txids; that goes away after the
conversion.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise, they're malleable. We only care about our own anchor:
their anchor is their problem (and they'll probably get away with it).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is an address that bitcoind will happily pay to, but we know it's
a witness output so our inputs to the anchor are immalleable.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently linearize and then measure the string; this is better since
we're about to do it in a second place.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need this for signing segwitness txs. Unfortunately, we don't have it
for transactions we received as hex, only ones we created; to make this safe
we use a pointer which is NULL if we don't know, and those will crash if
we try to sign or check their sigs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I had already disabled it, and this clears the decks for Segregated Witness
which gives us everything we want.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We now keep a list of commitment transaction states for "us" and
"them", as well as a "struct channel_state" for staged changes.
We manipulate these structures as we send out packets, receive
packets, or receive acknowledgement of packets. In particular, we
update the other nodes' staging_cstate as we send out our requests,
and update our own staging_cstate are we receive acks. When we
receive a request, we update both (as we immediately send out our
ack).
The RPC output is changed; rather than expose the complexity, we
expose our last committed state: what would happen if we have to drop
to the blockchain now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rather than creating packets then queueing them, call out to functions
which do both. This moves us towards doing more work in those functions
where we send out a request, which is sometimes clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And divide fees as specified there.
We still use fixed values rather than floating, and we don't send or
handle update_fee messages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We used to have a hacky close timeout which would immediately fire
when we'd closed because the connection was down. Far better to have
a specific "connection lost" input, and have it respond like CMD_CLOSE.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't actually implement closing when we have HTLCs (we should
allow it, as that's what the clearing phase is for), since soon we'll
rewrite HTLC to match the async HTLC protocol of BOLT #2.
Note that this folds the close paths, using a simple check if we have
a close transaction. That's a slight state layer violation, but
reduces code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For the change to asynchronous updates as specified by BOLT #2, we
need to know when the other side acknowledged a packet. This creates
a simple callback mechanism for it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we send the first two revocation hashes; this is important
once we move to a commit model as we need to send (unsolicited) the
signature for the *next* commit tx so we need its commit hash.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This encapsulates proposals more cleanly, and is important when we change
the protocol to have more than one outstanding at a time.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The channel funding code needs to know who offered the anchor, as they
are responsible for paying fees until the other side is able to. This
is actually a hack, but at least now it's internal to funding and not
passed in at every funding_delta() call.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If something goes wrong after we've broadcast the anchor tx, we need to use
the commit tx to spend it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It currently points into freed memory once we've make_commit_txs; we
don't currently dereference it after that, but I did in some test code
and got a surprise. Make a copy in all cases where we set it, so
there can't be lifetime problems.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is only for the simple case where there are no HTLCs.
We group the current commit information together in the struct;
this involves a trivial transform from peer->cur_commit_theirsig to
peer->cur_commit.theirsig.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is required for transactions which use OP_CSV to lock outputs for
a given amount of time: we need to know the mediantime of the block
they were included into.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We abort when this happens, but still worth testing.
This involves a refactor so we can allocate watches off a specific context,
for easy freeing when they're no longer wanted.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When a peer is finally to be freed (ie. STATE_CLOSED), doing this
inside the state logic is a bit fraught. We're better off exiting the
io loop and freeing it there.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We do the simplest thing: a timer goes off, and we check all HTLCs for
one which has expired more than 30 seconds ago.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise we won't finish the conversation. In fact, only the writer
side should ever close: we wake it if we want to close and it tests
peer->cond.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When the only commands are via JSON, you might argue that we should
simply insist the user not operate on the same peer in parallel. That
would suck, and also we need to handle the case of a command from
a timer (eg. HTLC expiry!) or a bitcoin event.
So, we need a queue for commands, but also we need to do some of the
command checking just before the command runs: the HTLC we're dealing
with might have vanished for example.
The current command is wrapped in an anonymous "curr_cmd" struct
for extra clarity.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell