Instead of reusing HSMFD_ECDH, we have an explicit channeld hsm fd,
which can do ECDH and will soon do channel announce signatures as well.
Based-on: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We *should* split the struct into key and data, rather than only comparing
the key parts in the htlc_end_eq function. But meanwhile, this fixes
the code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This lets us link HTLCs from one peer to another; but for the moment it
simply means we can adjust balance when an HTLC is fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is an approximate result (it's only our confirmed balance, not showing
outstanding HTLCs), but it gives an easy way to check HTLCs have been
resolved.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We call channel_sent_commit *before* sending (so we know if we need
to), so the name is wrong. Similarly channel_sent_revoke_and_ack.
We can usefully have them tell is if there is outstanding work to do,
too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Passing through 'struct peer *' was a layering violation.
Reported-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The three cases we care about only happen on specific transitions:
1. They can no longer spend our failed HTLC: we can fail the source now.
2. They are fully committed to their new HTLC htlc: we can forward now.
3. They can no longer timeout their fulfilled HTLC: the funds are ours.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The direction bit was computed in several spots and was inconsistent
in some cases. Now we compute it just in routing, and once when
starting up `channeld`, this avoids recomputing it all over the place.
Now we correctly use the remote revocation basepoint, we need to set
it in run-channel (instead of the local revocation basepoint).
We also update all the comments, as per (pending) spec commit:
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/137
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Before exiting, `channeld` constructs and sends a `channel_update`
marking the channel as disabled. This is the pro-active signalling
that the channel may no longer be used.
Copied the JSON-request parsing from `pay.c`, passing through to
`gossipd`, filling the reply with the `route_hop` serialization, and
serializing as JSON-RPC response.
The `route_hop` struct introduced in the previous refactoring is
reused when returning the reply to a `getroute` request. Since these
are nested messages I added the serialization and deserialization
methods.
This came up while debugging the gossip daemon breaking upon calling
`getroute`. It turns out that log was still writing to stdout, but
stdout had been reused for an inter-daemon socket, which would
break...
The STDOUT fd being reused as communication sockets with other daemons
was causing some unexpected crashes if the sub-daemon wrote something,
e.g., using `log_*`. Not closing it should avoid that conflict.
Some of the struct array helpers need to allocate data when
deserializing their fields. The `getnodes` reply is one such example
that allocates the hostname. Since the change to calling array helpers
the getnodes call was broken because it was attempting to allocate off
of the entry, which did not have a tal header, thus failing.
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
sstone