I made the mistake of thinking it was a [NUM_SIDES] array, but
it's actually our balance, and it's in millisatoshi. Rename
for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is what it actually is, and makes it clearer when we refer to the
spec. It's the commitment we're currently updating, which is the next
commitment.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We keep the scriptpubkey to send until after a commitment_signed (or,
in the corner case, if there's no pending commitment). When we
receive a shutdown from the peer, we pass it up to the master.
It's up to the master not to add any more HTLCs, which works because
we move from CHANNELD_NORMAL to CHANNELD_SHUTTING_DOWN.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't need to keep this around any more: by handing it to
subdaemons we ensure we'll close it if the peer disconnects, and we
also add code to get a new one on reconnection.
Because getting a gossip_fd is async, we re-check the peer state after
it gets back. This is kind of annoying: perhaps if we were to hand
the reconnected peer through gossipd (with a flag to immediately
return it) we could get the gossip fd that way and unify the paths?
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With no async calls left, we can just use a stack variable for the fd.
And we're now *always* in the hands of some daemon, unless we're
disconnected, so owner is only NULL in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means there's no GETTING_HSMFD state at all any more. We
temporarily play games with the hsm fd; those will go away once we're
done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means there's no GETTING_SIG_FROM_HSM state at all any more. We
temporarily play games with the hsm fd; those will go away once we're
done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need the old remote per_commitment_point so we can validate the
per_commitment_secret when we get it.
We unify this housekeeping in the master daemon using
update_per_commit_point().
This patch also saves whether remote funding is locked, and disallows
doing that twice (channeld should ignore it).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's easiest to have the master keep the last commit we sent, for
re-transmission. We could recalculate it, but it's made more difficult
by the before/after revoke case.
And because revoke_and_ack changes the channel state, we need to
remember which order we sent them in for re-transmission.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need this for reestablishing a channel.
(Note: this patch changes quite a bit in this series, but reshuffling was
tedious).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Currently it's fairly ad-hoc, but we need to tell it to channeld when
it restarts, so we define it as the non-HTLC balance.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It needs to save them to the db in case of restart; this means we tell
it about funding_locked, as well as the next_per_commit_point given
in revoke_and_ack.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use this to make it send the funding_signed message, rather than having
the master daemon do it (which was even more hacky). It also means it
can handle the crypto, so no need for the packet to be handed up encrypted,
and also make --dev-disconnect "just work" for this packet.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead, send it the funding_signed message; it can watch, save to
database, and send it.
Now the openingd fundee path is a simple request and response, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Like the fd, it's only useful when the peer is not in a daemon, so we
free & NULL it when that happens.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. We explicitly assert what state we're coming from, to make transitions
clearer.
2. Every transition has a state, even between owners while waiting for HSM.
3. Explictly step though getting the HSM signature on the funding tx
before starting channeld, rather than doing it in parallel: makes
states clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently create a peer struct, then complete handshake to find out
who it is. This means we have a half-formed peer, and worse: if it's
a reconnect we get two peers the same.
Add an explicit 'struct connection' for the handshake phase, and
construct a 'struct peer' once that's done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Only the side *accepting* the connection gives a `minumum_depth`, but both
sides are supposed to wait that long:
BOLT #2:
### The `funding_locked` message
...
#### Requirements
The sender MUST wait until the funding transaction has reached
`minimum-depth` before sending this message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is an approximate result (it's only our confirmed balance, not showing
outstanding HTLCs), but it gives an easy way to check HTLCs have been
resolved.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's a bit messy, since some status messages are accompanied by an FD:
in this case, the handler returns STATUS_NEED_FD and we read that then
re-call the handler.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell