lukechilds
/
node
mirror of https://github.com/lukechilds/node.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Browse Source

blog: Post about v0.10.0

v0.10.1-release
isaacs 12 years ago
parent
e2b293c360
commit
228ad9357c
1 changed files with 487 additions and 0 deletions
Whitespace
Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL
Split View
Diff Options
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File
  1. 487
      doc/blog/release/v0.10.0.md

487
doc/blog/release/v0.10.0.md
View File

@ -0,0 +1,487 @@
title: Node v0.10.0 (Stable)
category: release
version: 0.10.0
date: 2013-03-11T16:00:00.000Z
slug: node-v0-10-0-stable
author: Isaac Z. Schlueter
I am pleased to announce a new stable version of Node.
This branch brings significant improvements to many areas, with a
focus on API polish, ease of use, and backwards compatibility.
For a very brief overview of the relevant API changes since v0.8,
please see [the API changes wiki
page](https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Api-changes-between-v0.8-and-v0.10).
## Streams2
In a [previous post](http://blog.nodejs.org/2012/12/20/streams2/), we
introduced the
"[Streams2](http://blog.nodejs.org/2012/12/20/streams2/)" API changes.
If you haven't reviewed the changes, please go read that now (at least
the tl;dr section).
The changes to the stream interface have been a long time in the
making. Even from the earliest days of Node, we've all sort of known
that this whole "data events come right away" and "pause() is
advisory" stuff was unnecessarily awful. In v0.10, we finally bit the
bullet and committed to making drastic changes in order to make these
things better.
More importantly, all streams in Node-core are built using the same
set of easily-extended base classes, so their behavior is much more
consistent, and it's easier than ever to create streaming interfaces
in your own userland programs.
In fact, the Streams2 API was developed while using it for modules in
the npm registry. At the time of this writing, [37 published Node
modules](https://npmjs.org/browse/depended/readable-stream) already
are using the
[readable-stream](https://npmjs.org/package/readable-stream) library
as a dependency. The readable-stream npm package allows you to use
the new Stream interface in your legacy v0.8 codebase.
## Domains and Error Handling
The `domain` module has been elevated from "Experimental" to
"Unstable" status. It's been given more of a first-class treatment
internally, making it easier to handle some of the edge cases that we
found using Domains for error handling in v0.8. Specifically, domain
error handler no longer relies on `process.on('uncaughtException')`
being raised, and the C++ code in Node is domain-aware.
If you're not already using Domains to catch errors in your programs,
and you've found yourself wishing that you could get better debugging
information when errors are thrown (especially in the midst of lots of
requests and asynchronous calls), then definitely check it out.
## Faster process.nextTick
In v0.8 (and before), the `process.nextTick()` function scheduled its
callback using a spinner on the event loop. This *usually* caused the
callback to be fired before any other I/O. However, it was not
guaranteed.
As a result, a lot of programs (including some parts of Node's
internals) began using `process.nextTick` as a "do later, but before
any actual I/O is performed" interface. Since it usually works that
way, it seemed fine.
However, under load, it's possible for a server to have a lot of I/O
scheduled, to the point where the `nextTick` gets preempted for
something else. This led to some odd errors and race conditions,
which could not be fixed without changing the semantics of nextTick.
So, that's what we did. In v0.10, `nextTick` handlers are run right
after each call from C++ into JavaScript. That means that, if your
JavaScript code calls `process.nextTick`, then the callback will fire
as soon as the code runs to completion, but *before* going back to
the event loop. The race is over, and all is good.
However, there are programs out in the wild that use recursive calls
to `process.nextTick` to avoid pre-empting the I/O event loop for
long-running jobs. In order to avoid breaking horribly right away,
Node will now print a deprecation warning, and ask you to use
`setImmediate` for these kinds of tasks instead.
## Latency and Idle Garbage Collection
One of the toughest things to get right in a garbage collected
language is garbage collection. In order to try to avoid excessive
memory usage, Node used to try to tell V8 to collect some garbage
whenever the event loop was idle.
However, knowing exactly when to do this is extremely difficult.
There are different degrees of "idleness", and if you get it wrong,
you can easily end up spending massive amounts of time collecting
garbage when you'd least expect. In practice, disabling the
`IdleNotification` call yields better performance without any
excessive memory usage, because V8 is pretty good at knowing when it's
the best time to run GC.
So, in v0.10, we just ripped that feature out. (According to another
point of view, we fixed the bug that it was ever there in the first
place.) As a result, latency is much more predictable and stable.
You won't see a difference in the benchmarks as a result of this, but
you'll probably find that your app's response times are more reliable.
## Performance and Benchmarks
When the Streams2 feature first landed in master, it disrupted a lot
of things. We focused first on correctness rather than speed, and as
a result of that, we got a correct implementation that was
significantly slower.
We have a consistent rule in Node, that it cannot be allowed to get
slower for our main use cases. It took a lot of work, but over the
last few months, we've managed to get v0.10 to an appropriate level of
performance, without sacrificing the API goals that we had in mind.
Benchmarks are complicated beasts. Until this release, we've gotten
by with a pretty ad-hoc approach to running benchmarks. However, as
we started actually having to track down regressions, the need for a
more comprehensive approach was obvious.
Work is underway to figure out the optimum way to get statistically
significant benchmark results in an automated way. As it is, we're
still seeing significant jitter in some of the data, so take the red
and green colors with a grain of salt.
The benchmarks below were run on an Apple 13-inch, Late 2011 MacBook
Pro with a 2.8 GHz Intel Core i7 processor, 8GB of 1333MHz DDR3 RAM,
running OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63b). The numbers are slightly different
on Linux and SmartOS, but the conclusions are the same. The [raw data
is available](http://nodejs.org/benchmarks-v0.10-vs-v0.8/), as well.
## Benchmarks: http
Node is for websites, and websites run over HTTP, so this is the one
that people usually care the most about:
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
http/cluster.js type=bytes length=4: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 16843</span> v0.8: 16202 ................. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">3.96%</span>
http/cluster.js type=bytes length=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 15505</span> v0.8: 15065 .............. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">2.92%</span>
http/cluster.js type=bytes length=102400: v0.10: 1555.2 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 1566.3</span> ......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-0.71%</span>
http/cluster.js type=buffer length=4: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 15308</span> v0.8: 14763 ................ <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">3.69%</span>
http/cluster.js type=buffer length=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 15039</span> v0.8: 14830 ............. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">1.41%</span>
http/cluster.js type=buffer length=102400: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 7584.6</span> v0.8: 7433.6 ......... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">2.03%</span>
http/simple.js type=bytes length=4: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 12343</span> v0.8: 11761 .................. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">4.95%</span>
http/simple.js type=bytes length=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 11051</span> v0.8: 10287 ............... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">7.43%</span>
http/simple.js type=bytes length=102400: v0.10: 853.19 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 892.75</span> .......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-4.43%</span>
http/simple.js type=buffer length=4: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 11316</span> v0.8: 10728 ................. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">5.48%</span>
http/simple.js type=buffer length=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 11199</span> v0.8: 10429 .............. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">7.38%</span>
http/simple.js type=buffer length=102400: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 4942.1</span> v0.8: 4822.9 .......... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">2.47%</span>
</pre>
What we see here is that, overall, HTTP is faster. It's just slightly
slower (1-5%) when sending extremely large string messages (ie
`type=bytes` rather than `type=buffer`). But otherwise, things are
about the same, or slightly faster.
## Benchmarks: fs
The fs.ReadStream throughput is massively improved, and less affected
by the chunk size argument:
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
fs/read-stream buf size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1106.6 v0.8: 60.597 ................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">1726.12%</span>
fs/read-stream buf size=4096: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1107.9 v0.8: 235.51 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">370.44%</span>
fs/read-stream buf size=65535: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1108.2 v0.8: 966.84 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">14.62%</span>
fs/read-stream buf size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1103.3 v0.8: 959.66 .................. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">14.97%</span>
fs/read-stream asc size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1081.5 v0.8: 62.218 ................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">1638.21%</span>
fs/read-stream asc size=4096: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1082.3 v0.8: 174.78 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">519.21%</span>
fs/read-stream asc size=65535: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1083.9 v0.8: 627.91 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">72.62%</span>
fs/read-stream asc size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 1083.2 v0.8: 627.49 .................. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">72.62%</span>
fs/read-stream utf size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 46.553 v0.8: 16.944 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">174.74%</span>
fs/read-stream utf size=4096: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 46.585 v0.8: 32.933 ..................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">41.45%</span>
fs/read-stream utf size=65535: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 46.57 v0.8: 45.832 ...................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">1.61%</span>
fs/read-stream utf size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 46.576 v0.8: 45.884 ................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">1.51%</span>
</pre>
The fs.WriteStream throughput increases considerably, for most
workloads. As the size of the chunk goes up, the speed is limited by
the underlying system and the cost of string conversion, so v0.8 and
v0.10 converge. But for smaller chunk sizes (like you'd be more
likely to see in real applications), v0.10 is a significant
improvement.
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
fs/write-stream buf size=2: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 0.12434 v0.8: 0.10097 ..................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">23.15%</span>
fs/write-stream buf size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 59.926 v0.8: 49.822 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">20.28%</span>
fs/write-stream buf size=65535: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 180.41 v0.8: 179.26 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">0.64%</span>
fs/write-stream buf size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 181.49 v0.8: 176.73 .................. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">2.70%</span>
fs/write-stream asc size=2: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 0.11133 v0.8: 0.08123 ..................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">37.06%</span>
fs/write-stream asc size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 53.023 v0.8: 36.708 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">44.45%</span>
fs/write-stream asc size=65535: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 178.54 v0.8: 174.36 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">2.39%</span>
fs/write-stream asc size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 185.27 v0.8: 183.65 .................. <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">0.88%</span>
fs/write-stream utf size=2: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 0.11165 v0.8: 0.080079 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">39.43%</span>
fs/write-stream utf size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 45.166 v0.8: 32.636 .................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">38.39%</span>
fs/write-stream utf size=65535: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10</span>: 176.1 v0.8: 175.34 ..................... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">0.43%</span>
fs/write-stream utf size=1048576: v0.10: 182.3 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8</span>: 182.82 .................. <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-0.28%</span>
</pre>
## Benchmark: tls
We switched to a newer version of OpenSSL, and the CryptoStream
implementation was significantly changed to support the Stream2
interface.
The throughput of TLS connections is massively improved:
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=buf size=2: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 0.90836</span> v0.8: 0.32381 ....... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">180.52%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=buf size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 222.84</span> v0.8: 116.75 ....... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">90.87%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=buf size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 403.17</span> v0.8: 360.42 .... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">11.86%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=asc size=2: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 0.78323</span> v0.8: 0.28761 ....... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">172.32%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=asc size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 199.7</span> v0.8: 102.46 ........ <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">94.91%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=asc size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 375.85</span> v0.8: 317.81 .... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">18.26%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=utf size=2: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 0.78503</span> v0.8: 0.28834 ....... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">172.26%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=utf size=1024: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 182.43</span> v0.8: 100.3 ........ <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">81.88%</span>
tls/throughput.js dur=5 type=utf size=1048576: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 333.05</span> v0.8: 301.57 .... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">10.44%</span>
</pre>
However, the speed at which we can make connections is somewhat
reduced:
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
tls/tls-connect.js concurrency=1 dur=5: v0.10: 433.05 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 560.43</span> .......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-22.73%</span>
tls/tls-connect.js concurrency=10 dur=5: v0.10: 438.38 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 577.93</span> ......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-24.15%</span>
</pre>
At this point, it seems like the connection speed is related to the
new version of OpenSSL, but we'll be tracking that further.
TLS still has more room for improvement, but this throughput increase
is a huge step.
## Benchmark: net
The net throughput tests tell an interesting story. When sending
ascii messages, they're much faster.
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
net/net-c2s.js len=102400 type=asc dur=5: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 3.6551</span> v0.8: 2.0478 ......... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">78.49%</span>
net/net-c2s.js len=16777216 type=asc dur=5: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 3.2428</span> v0.8: 2.0503 ....... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">58.16%</span>
net/net-pipe.js len=102400 type=asc dur=5: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 4.4638</span> v0.8: 3.0798 ........ <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">44.94%</span>
net/net-pipe.js len=16777216 type=asc dur=5: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 3.9449</span> v0.8: 2.8906 ...... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">36.48%</span>
net/net-s2c.js len=102400 type=asc dur=5: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 3.6306</span> v0.8: 2.0415 ......... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">77.84%</span>
net/net-s2c.js len=16777216 type=asc dur=5: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 3.2271</span> v0.8: 2.0636 ....... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">56.38%</span>
</pre>
When sending Buffer messages, they're just slightly slower. (This
difference is less than the typical variability of the test, but they
were run 20 times and outliers were factored out for this post.)
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
net/net-c2s.js len=102400 type=buf dur=5: v0.10: 5.5597 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 5.6967</span> ......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-2.40%</span>
net/net-c2s.js len=16777216 type=buf dur=5: v0.10: 6.1843 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 6.4595</span> ....... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-4.26%</span>
net/net-pipe.js len=102400 type=buf dur=5: v0.10: 5.6898 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 5.986</span> ......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-4.95%</span>
net/net-pipe.js len=16777216 type=buf dur=5: <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">v0.10: 5.9643</span> v0.8: 5.9251 ....... <span style="background-color:#0f0;color:#000">0.66%</span>
net/net-s2c.js len=102400 type=buf dur=5: v0.10: 5.473 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 5.6492</span> .......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-3.12%</span>
net/net-s2c.js len=16777216 type=buf dur=5: v0.10: 6.1986 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 6.3236</span> ....... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-1.98%</span>
</pre>
When sending utf-8 messages, they're a bit slower than that:
<pre style="background-color:#333;color:#eee;font-size:12px">
net/net-c2s.js len=102400 type=utf dur=5: v0.10: 2.2671 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 2.4606</span> ......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-7.87%</span>
net/net-c2s.js len=16777216 type=utf dur=5: v0.10: 1.7434 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 1.8771</span> ....... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-7.12%</span>
net/net-pipe.js len=102400 type=utf dur=5: v0.10: 3.1679 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 3.5401</span> ....... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-10.51%</span>
net/net-pipe.js len=16777216 type=utf dur=5: v0.10: 2.5615 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 2.7002</span> ...... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-5.14%</span>
net/net-s2c.js len=102400 type=utf dur=5: v0.10: 2.2495 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 2.4578</span> ......... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-8.48%</span>
net/net-s2c.js len=16777216 type=utf dur=5: v0.10: 1.7733 <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">v0.8: 1.8975</span> ....... <span style="background-color:#f00;color:#fff">-6.55%</span>
</pre>
You might suspect that this is a result of the new Streams
implementation. However, running the same benchmarks without using
any of the code in Node's `lib/` folder, just calling into the C++
bindings directly, yields consistently similar results.
This slight regression comes along with significant improvements in
everything that sits on *top* of TCP (that is, TLS and HTTP).
Keep an eye out for more work in this area. Fast is never fast
enough!
## Continuous Integration
To support a higher degree of stability, and hopefully catch issues
sooner, we have a Jenkins instance running every commit through the
test suite, on each operating system we support. You can watch the
action at [the Node Jenkins web portal](http://jenkins.nodejs.org/).
Coming soon, we'll have automatically generated nightly builds every
day, and eventually, the entire release process will be automated.
While we're pretty rigorous about running tests and benchmarks, it's
easy for things to slip by, and our ad-hoc methods are not cutting it
any longer. This promises a much lower incidence of the sort of
regressions that delayed the release of v0.10 for several months.
## Growing Out
A year ago, we said that the innovation in the Node universe would be
happening in userland modules. Now, we've finally taken that to its
logical conclusion, and moved our iteration on **core** modules into
userland as well. Things like `readable-stream` and `tlsnappy` allow
us to get much more user-testing, experimentation, and contributions
to a feature.
The userland module can live on as a compatibility layer so that
libraries can use the new features, even if they need to support older
versions of Node. This is a remarkably effective way to do node-core
development. Future developments will continue to be iterated in
userland modules.
## Growing Up <a name="enterprise"></a>
The question comes up pretty often whether Node is "ready for prime
time" yet. I usually answer that it depends on your requirements for
"prime time", but Node has been powering some high profile sites, and
the options for "real" companies using Node for The Business are
better than ever.
It would be out of scope to try to provide an exhaustive list of all
the companies using Node, and all of the options for support and
training. However, here are a few resources that are quickly
expanding to fill the "Enterprise Node" space.
For those looking for commercial support,
[StrongLoop](http://strongloop.com/) (Ben Noordhuis & Bert Belder's
company) has released a distribution containing node v0.10 that they
will support on Windows, Mac, Red Hat/Fedora, Debian/Ubuntu and
multiple cloud platforms. You can [download their Node distribution
here](http://strongloop.com/products#downloads).
[The Node Firm](http://thenodefirm.com) is a worldwide network of key
Node contributors and community members that help organizations
succeed with Node. Through corporate training, consulting,
architectural guidance, and [ongoing consulting
subscriptions](http://thenodefirm.com/nodejs-consulting-subscriptions),
they have helped Skype, Qualcomm, and others quickly and effectively
embrace Node.
Node would not be what it is without [npm](https://npmjs.org/), and
npm would not be what it is without the registry of published modules.
However, relying on the public registry is problematic for many
enterprise use-cases. [Iris npm](https://www.irisnpm.com/) is a fully
managed private npm registry, from [Iris
Couch](http://www.iriscouch.com), the team that runs the public npm
registry in production.
[Joyent](http://joyent.com), the company you probably know as the
custodian of the Node project, provides high performance cloud
infrastructure specializing in real-time web and mobile applications.
Joyent uses Node extensively throughout their stack, and provides
impressive [post-mortem debugging and real-time performance analysis
tools](http://dtrace.org/blogs/dap/2012/05/31/debugging-node-js-in-production-fluent-slides/)
for Node.js applications. They are my also employer, so I'd probably
have to get a "real" job if they weren't sponsoring Node :)
## Next Up: v0.12
The focus of Node v0.12 will be to make HTTP better. Node's current
HTTP implementation is pretty good, and clearly sufficient to do a lot
of interesting things with. However:
1. The codebase is a mess. We share a lot of code between the Client
and Server implementations, but do so in a way that makes it
unnecessarily painful to read the code or fix bugs. It will be
split up so that client and server are clearly separated, and have
cleaner interfaces.
2. The socket pooling behavior is confusing and weird. We will be
adding configurable socket pooling as a standalone utility. This
will allow us to implement KeepAlive behavior in a more reasonable
manner, as well as providing something that you can use in your own
programs.
There is some experimentation going on in the
[tlsnappy](https://github.com/indutny/tlsnappy) module, which may make
its way back into the core TLS implementation and speed things up
considerably.
## 1.0
After 0.12, the next major stable release will be 1.0. At that point,
very little will change in terms of the day-to-day operation of the
project, but it will mark a significant milestone in terms of our
stability and willingness to add new features. However, we've already
gotten strict about maintaining backwards compatibility, so this won't
really be so much of a shift.
New versions will still come out, especially to pull in new versions
of our dependencies, and bugs will continue to be fixed. There's been
talk of pinning our release cycles to V8, and automating the release
process in some interesting ways.
The goal of Node has always been to eventually be "finished" with the
core program. Of course, that's a rather lofty goal, perhaps even
impossible. But as we take Node to more places, and use it in more
ways, we're getting closer to the day when the relevant innovation
happens outside of the core Node program.
Stability in the platform enables growth on top of it.
And now, the traditional release notes:
## 2013.03.11, Version 0.10.0 (Stable)
* npm: Upgrade to 1.2.14
* core: Append filename properly in dlopen on windows (isaacs)
* zlib: Manage flush flags appropriately (isaacs)
* domains: Handle errors thrown in nested error handlers (isaacs)
* buffer: Strip high bits when converting to ascii (Ben Noordhuis)
* win/msi: Enable modify and repair (Bert Belder)
* win/msi: Add feature selection for various Node parts (Bert Belder)
* win/msi: use consistent registry key paths (Bert Belder)
* child_process: support sending dgram socket (Andreas Madsen)
* fs: Raise EISDIR on Windows when calling fs.read/write on a dir (isaacs)
* unix: fix strict aliasing warnings, macro-ify functions (Ben Noordhuis)
* unix: honor UV_THREADPOOL_SIZE environment var (Ben Noordhuis)
* win/tty: fix typo in color attributes enumeration (Bert Belder)
* win/tty: don't touch insert mode or quick edit mode (Bert Belder)
Source Code: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/node-v0.10.0.tar.gz
Macintosh Installer (Universal): http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/node-v0.10.0.pkg
Windows Installer: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/node-v0.10.0-x86.msi
Windows x64 Installer: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/x64/node-v0.10.0-x64.msi
Windows x64 Files: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/x64/
Linux 32-bit Binary: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/node-v0.10.0-linux-x86.tar.gz
Linux 64-bit Binary: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/node-v0.10.0-linux-x64.tar.gz
Solaris 32-bit Binary: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/node-v0.10.0-sunos-x86.tar.gz
Solaris 64-bit Binary: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/node-v0.10.0-sunos-x64.tar.gz
Other release files: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.10.0/
Website: http://nodejs.org/docs/v0.10.0/
Documentation: http://nodejs.org/docs/v0.10.0/api/
Shasums:
```
b9e9bca99cdb5563cad3d3f04baa262e317b827c node-v0.10.0-darwin-x64.tar.gz
0227c9bc3df5b62267b9d4e3b0a92b3a70732229 node-v0.10.0-darwin-x86.tar.gz
9f5f7350d6f889ea8e794516ecfea651e8e53d24 node-v0.10.0-linux-x64.tar.gz
cc5f1cd6a2f2530bc400e761144bbaf8fcb66cc4 node-v0.10.0-linux-x86.tar.gz
42c14b7eab398976b1ac0a8e6e96989059616af5 node-v0.10.0-sunos-x64.tar.gz
ddcadbac66d1acea48aa6c5462d0a0d7308ea823 node-v0.10.0-sunos-x86.tar.gz
70eacf2cca7abec79fac4ca502e8d99590a2108a node-v0.10.0-x86.msi
c48c269b9b0f0a95e6e9234d4597d1c8a1c45c5a node-v0.10.0.pkg
7321266347dc1c47ed2186e7d61752795ce8a0ef node-v0.10.0.tar.gz
f8c6f55469551243ea461f023cc57c024f57fef2 node.exe
253ae79e411fcfddcf28861559ececb4b335db64 node.exp
acb8febb5ea714c065f201ced5423b0838fdf1b6 node.lib
0fdad1400036dd26d720070f783d3beeb3bb9c0a node.pdb
abcaf8ef606655a05e73ee5d06715ffd022aad22 x64/node-v0.10.0-x64.msi
e5d0c235629b26430b6e07c07ee2c7dcda82f35e x64/node.exe
43b3fb3a6aaf6a04f578ee607a9455c1e23acf08 x64/node.exp
87dd6eb6c8127a1af0dcca639961441fc303d75a x64/node.lib
50aca715777fa42b854e6cfc56b6199a54aabd3c x64/node.pdb
```
Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save