mirror of https://github.com/lukechilds/node.git
Browse Source
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7970 Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>v7.x
Josh Gavant
9 years ago
committed by
James M Snell
James M Snell
1 changed files with 202 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ |
|||
# Node Foundation CTC Meeting 2016-07-20 |
|||
|
|||
## Links |
|||
|
|||
* **Audio Recording**: TBP |
|||
* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/7809 |
|||
* **Minutes Google Doc**: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gr1XX-DuzgGXON5uAzrZHjWwXoQ4AIJEAJ2DK5jNmp4> |
|||
* _Previous Minutes Google Doc: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fP9_ZNcPoFh2VWCgUFu9-rDiDcMP88vhCC_oX6Aj528>_ |
|||
|
|||
## Present |
|||
|
|||
* Anna Henningsen @addaleax (observer) |
|||
* Ben Noordhuis @bnoordhuis (CTC) |
|||
* Сковорода Никита Андреевич @ChALkeR (CTC) |
|||
* Colin Ihrig @cjihrig (CTC) |
|||
* Evan Lucas @evanlucas (CTC) |
|||
* Jeremiah Senkpiel @Fishrock123 (CTC) |
|||
* Josh Gavant @joshgav (observer/Microsoft) |
|||
* Michael Dawson @mhdawson (CTC) |
|||
* Julien Gilli @misterdjules (CTC) |
|||
* Brian White @mscdex (CTC) |
|||
* Ali Ijaz Sheikh @ofrobots (CTC) |
|||
* Alexis Campailla @orangemocha (CTC) |
|||
* Rod Vagg @rvagg (CTC) |
|||
* Seth Thompson @s3ththompson (observer/Google) |
|||
* Shigeki Ohtsu @shigeki (CTC) |
|||
* Steven R Loomis @srl295 (observer/IBM/ICU) |
|||
* Myles Borins @TheAlphaNerd (observer) |
|||
* Trevor Norris @trevnorris (CTC) |
|||
* Rich Trott @Trott (CTC) |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
## Standup |
|||
|
|||
* Anna Henningsen @addaleax (observer) |
|||
* Issues & PRs |
|||
* looking into porting JS-based realpath to C |
|||
* Ben Noordhuis @bnoordhuis (CTC) |
|||
* The usual (PR review and comment) |
|||
* Updating code base to do less manual memory management. PR coming soon. |
|||
* Сковорода Никита Андреевич @ChALkeR (CTC) |
|||
* Some initial work on docs linting. |
|||
* Some comments on issues and PRs. |
|||
* Colin Ihrig @cjihrig (CTC) |
|||
* Reviewed issues and PRs |
|||
* Opened PRs |
|||
* Evan Lucas @evanlucas (CTC) |
|||
* working on v6.3.1 release |
|||
* working on repl bugfix |
|||
* Jeremiah Senkpiel @Fishrock123 (CTC) |
|||
* Did some timers review for https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/5aac4c42da104c30d8f701f1042d61c2f06b7e6c |
|||
* Clearing out some other old stuff I’ve assigned myself to |
|||
* Josh Gavant @joshgav (observer/Microsoft) |
|||
* Internal Microsoft work. |
|||
* Michael Dawson @mhdawson (CTC) |
|||
* Misc issues with PPC machines, added new PPC |
|||
machines from newer openstack |
|||
* Working with Ian/Sampson on ABI stable abi, status |
|||
update at API WG meeting |
|||
* Working with Richard/Howard on post-mortem activities, |
|||
post-mortem WG meeting this week. |
|||
* Misc reviews/lands |
|||
* Reading/keeping up/commenting on issues |
|||
* Getting ready for Node Summit talk. |
|||
* Julien Gilli @misterdjules (CTC) |
|||
* Looking forward to getting more involved again |
|||
* Investigating timers bug. Looking for someone to mentor on it |
|||
* Reviewing and commenting on pull requests |
|||
* Brian White @mscdex (CTC) |
|||
* Diving deep into reworking API docs |
|||
* Reviewing PRs, commenting on issues |
|||
* Ali Ijaz Sheikh @ofrobots (CTC) |
|||
* shepherding some V8 backports, v8_inspector license issue and roll |
|||
* Alexis Campailla @orangemocha (CTC) |
|||
* Nothing to report. |
|||
* Rod Vagg @rvagg (CTC) |
|||
* Usual administrative stuff, some build maintenance |
|||
* Seth Thompson @s3ththompson (observer/Google) |
|||
* Setting priorities for the next quarter. |
|||
* Team is continuing work on v8_inspector. |
|||
* Migrating v8_inspector into V8 itself. |
|||
* Shigeki Ohtsu @shigeki (CTC) |
|||
* Nothing special. Working internal jobs. |
|||
* Steven R Loomis @srl295 (observer/IBM/ICU) |
|||
* Nodesummit prep… |
|||
* Myles Borins @TheAlphaNerd (observer) |
|||
* v4.5.0-rc.2 released |
|||
* Email sent to npm team |
|||
* Trevor Norris @trevnorris (CTC) |
|||
* realpath fix |
|||
* Rich Trott @Trott (CTC) |
|||
* CTC governance doc updates |
|||
* onboarded @andrasq, will set up something with @princejwesley next, open to other nominations for after that |
|||
* eliminating more flaky tests (IT NEVER ENDS!!!!11!!!) |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
## Agenda |
|||
|
|||
Extracted from **ctc-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting. |
|||
|
|||
### nodejs/node |
|||
|
|||
* [meta] realpath issues in v6 [#7726](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/7726) |
|||
* v4.5.0 proposal [#7688](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7688) |
|||
* http: don't inherit from Object.prototype [#6102](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6102) |
|||
|
|||
### nodejs/node-eps |
|||
|
|||
* proposal: WHATWG URL standard implementation [#28](https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/pull/28) |
|||
|
|||
## Previous Meeting |
|||
|
|||
* build: drop support for VS 2013 in v7 [#7484](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7484) |
|||
|
|||
* Node 6 fs.realpath behavior changes [#7175](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7175) |
|||
|
|||
* http: don't inherit from Object.prototype [#6102](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6102) |
|||
|
|||
* v4.5.0 proposal [#7688](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7688) |
|||
|
|||
* proposal: WHATWG URL standard implementation [#28](https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/pull/28) |
|||
|
|||
## Minutes |
|||
|
|||
### [meta] realpath issues in v6 [#7726](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/7726) |
|||
|
|||
@rvagg: some discussion of reversion to v5 behavior, i.e. JS implementation rather than libuv implementation. |
|||
|
|||
@trevnorris: looks like everybody’s leaning towards a full revert (or at least a partial revert). I don’t like this plan but will go along. |
|||
|
|||
@addaleax: Unfortunate to have to do full revert for *nix systems. But having alternate impl for Windows increases maintenance costs. |
|||
|
|||
As part of the new implementation, the `cache` parameter was removed from the method. It was created to improve perf for the JS impl but is considered less necessary since the native impl performs better anyway. |
|||
|
|||
Should we reinstate the `cache` parameter as part of the revert? Would this be a semver-major again? Does caching in the JS impl provide a significant perf benefit? |
|||
|
|||
@addaleax: Benchmarking fs perf will show how much benefit the caching capability in libuv provides. |
|||
|
|||
@mhdawson: we run two benchmarks nightly: one with caching and one without. |
|||
|
|||
@orangemocha: It seems okay to have two impl’s, one for Windows and one for *nix, increased maintenance surface isn’t a concern, libuv manages libuv impl. |
|||
|
|||
@rvagg: As we move v6 to LTS it would be best to have a known-good implementation. So would prefer a full revert, then fix libuv impl independently, then re-integrate. |
|||
|
|||
@thealphanerd: Could we provide both interfaces? Revert the primary one to original behavior and add a second one with libuv behavior? |
|||
|
|||
@rvagg: Still doesn’t address breaking change in Windows. |
|||
|
|||
@fishrock123: also in favor of reverting. This has been going on for a long time, best to revert and then fix. |
|||
|
|||
@orangemocha: should not compromise correctness for performance. |
|||
|
|||
@trevnorris: caching could be separated from fs API. For example, it could be part of `module` module. |
|||
|
|||
@rvagg: This is why I’m in favor of a full reversion. These other discussions may continue for a month and we need to correct problem now. |
|||
|
|||
@thealphanerd: do we have a list of the original bugs the libuv patch addressed? |
|||
|
|||
@saghul has a list. |
|||
|
|||
@rvagg: back to github for now. |
|||
|
|||
**Next steps**: continue discussion in GH. |
|||
|
|||
### v4.5.0 proposal [#7688](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7688) |
|||
|
|||
@thealphanerd is raising visibility for tests and feedback. |
|||
|
|||
@misterdjules may have some testers. |
|||
|
|||
### http: don't inherit from Object.prototype [#6102](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6102) |
|||
|
|||
@rvagg: Need choices to vote on. |
|||
|
|||
@ofrobots: Wants to explore more options including `map` so wait for vote. If the goal is to go to a map why don’t we do that now? |
|||
|
|||
@Fishrock123: Because community has taken dependencies on it being an object. |
|||
|
|||
@ofrobots: headers end up with “megamorphic IC’s” so wants to research further. |
|||
|
|||
@Fishrock123: We are fixing this because header names like `__proto__` conflict with default object properties. |
|||
|
|||
We should really just make an API for headers. |
|||
|
|||
@rvagg: We’ll come back to this next week. Prepare wording for vote if ready. |
|||
|
|||
**Next steps**: List available options and conduct vote next week. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
## Q/A on public fora |
|||
|
|||
None. |
|||
|
|||
## Upcoming Meetings |
|||
|
|||
* CTC: 2016-07-27 |
|||
* TSC: 2016-07-28 |
|||
* Build: 2016-08-07 |
|||
* LTS: 2016-07-25 |
|||
* Diagnostics: 2016-08-03 |
|||
* Post-Mortem: August |
|||
* API: August |
|||
Loading…
Reference in new issue